This paper presents a personal reflection on Life Styles Inventory (LSI) results, examining how three dominant thinking styles — self-actualizing, achievement-oriented, and oppositional — shape an individual's approach to management and leadership. The author analyzes scores across the LSI's constructive, passive/defensive, and aggressive/defensive style categories, discussing the strengths and limitations each style introduces in planning, organizing, leading, and controlling. The paper also traces the developmental origins of each style to family, culture, and education. It concludes with an honest acknowledgment of potential self-assessment bias and a commitment to seeking external validation of the results.
The paper demonstrates effective use of a structured self-assessment framework (the LSI) as an analytical lens. Rather than simply describing personality traits, the author maps each style onto the four functions of management — planning, organizing, leading, and controlling — showing how abstract psychological categories translate into concrete professional behaviors. This technique of scaffolding personal reflection onto an established theoretical model is central to management and organizational behavior coursework.
The paper opens with a contextual introduction that explains the LSI tool and previews the author's score distribution across all three style categories. Three body sections then examine the primary, backup, and limiting styles in turn. A fourth section synthesizes how all three styles interact to shape overall management effectiveness. A fifth section traces the biographical origins of each style. The conclusion reflects on the limits of self-report methodology and proposes a practical next step — having a mentor complete the inventory externally — to validate the results.
One of the greatest obstacles to becoming a successful manager is developing an understanding of one's own innate strengths and weaknesses. While every person may have leadership potential, leadership comes more naturally to some people than to others. Moreover, the best leaders are those who are aware of and capitalize on their own strengths while taking actions to minimize their weaknesses. The Life Styles Inventory (LSI) is one tool that people can use to help identify their innate personal styles and learn how those styles can impact them in their roles as managers and leaders.
This paper examines my own LSI scores, assessing not only my strengths and weaknesses, but also how those traits fit into my overall character profile. The LSI is broken into three broad categories: constructive styles, passive/defensive styles, and aggressive/defensive styles. The constructive styles reflect positive behaviors and include humanistic-encouraging, affiliative, achievement, and self-actualizing styles. For all of those characteristics, I scored at least at the 75th percentile (Human Synergistics International, Your LSI, 2014). The passive/defensive styles are self-protective thinking and behaviors that reflect interactions with people and include approval, dependent, conventional, and avoidant styles. I ranged from the 34th to 75th percentiles in those categories (Human Synergistics International, Your LSI, 2014). Finally, the aggressive/defensive styles are self-promoting thinking through task-related activities and include oppositional, power, competitive, and perfectionistic styles. I ranged from the 6th to 42nd percentile in these categories (Human Synergistics International, Your LSI, 2014). I was not surprised to discover that I self-identified with more positive behaviors than negative ones, but I do wonder whether those results are attributable to bias or whether they accurately reflect my approach to leadership and management.
My primary thinking style is the self-actualizing style. I was in the 99th percentile for this style, meaning that I scored higher than 99% of respondents on this characteristic — making self-actualizing very descriptive of my behavior. "Individualistic by nature, self-actualized people have a strong interest in working to become everything they are capable of being. They have a healthy sense of self-worth, a strong curiosity about people and things, and an acute awareness of both their own and others' feelings" (Human Synergistics International, Self-actualizing, 2014). Furthermore, self-actualizing people are highly creative and imaginative.
I am not surprised to find myself in such a high percentile in this group. I do feel a high degree of personal fulfillment. Moreover, I believe this is the result of positive growth over my lifetime, and I agree with the idea that "self-actualization is the final step in one's growth and maturation process" (Human Synergistics International, Self-actualizing, 2014). I believe that this style makes me very open to people and helps me empathize with others, in large part because I am not overly concerned with how others perceive me. This, in turn, makes it possible for me to be more objective about others.
My backup thinking style is achievement-oriented. I was in the 80th percentile for this style. The achievement scale examines personal effectiveness and is a good measure of achieving results on projects. While those with an achievement-based orientation are internally motivated, they also understand that they can improve outcomes on an objective scale. That describes my approach to work well; I find work highly rewarding and motivational. Achievement-oriented individuals "are most interested in getting the job done and in doing it well. These individuals often possess the skills necessary for effective planning and problem-solving" (Human Synergistics International, Achievement-oriented, 2014).
I feel that planning and problem-solving are two of my strong areas. Rather than feeling defeated by problems, I think of them as challenges to overcome. Furthermore, while I believe that this style has led me to set very high standards, I also feel that those standards are realistic. I believe in "setting and accomplishing realistic, attainable goals, rather than goals imposed by others" (Human Synergistics International, Achievement-oriented, 2014).
Generally, I was not surprised to find that I highly identified with positive attributes like self-actualization and achievement. I have always been a very goal-oriented person and have accomplished most of my goals. Furthermore, I have been successful in leadership and management positions, even when moving into high-risk scenarios in those roles. However, I do wonder whether I exhibited bias in answering the inventory, because I am aware of the traits considered positive and negative — awareness that may have led me to minimize the impact of my own negative behaviors on my leadership style. As a result, the question I am left with is: do my results accurately reflect my abilities as a leader?
What I would like to do is ask one of my mentors or a supervisor to complete the inventory as if they were me, answering honestly. I believe those results would help me evaluate whether my perceptions of my own behavior are accurate and would provide a more balanced picture of my true leadership profile.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.