Luther, Calvin, and Pascal: Reformation Theology Compared
This paper examines three foundational premises of Reformation theology — the sole authority of Scripture, justification by faith alone, and the priesthood of the believer — as expressed in the writings of Martin Luther and John Calvin, with reference to Jonathan Edwards. It analyzes how Luther's "On the Freedom of a Christian" challenges Catholic works-based salvation, how Calvin's "Institutes of the Christian Religion" links self-knowledge to knowledge of God, and how Calvin's TULIP doctrine addresses predestination, limited atonement, and saving grace. The paper also identifies an internal tension in Calvinist theology, where the doctrine of election risks producing the very hypocrisy Calvin warns against.
- Introduction to Reformation Theology: Three core Reformation premises and their significance
- Luther on Faith, Works, and Christian Liberty: Faith over works; liberty through love not law
- Luther's Critique of Catholic Priesthood and Authority: Priesthood of believer versus clerical power
- Calvin on Self-Knowledge and Knowledge of God: Self-knowledge as path to knowing God
- Calvin's TULIP Doctrine and Predestination: Election, limited atonement, and irresistible grace
- Tensions and Contradictions in Calvinist Theology: Election doctrine risks the hypocrisy Calvin condemned
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper consistently ties textual analysis back to the three core Reformation premises, giving the argument a clear organizational spine throughout.
- It identifies an internal contradiction in Calvinist theology — that the doctrine of election risks encouraging the very hypocrisy Calvin explicitly condemns — demonstrating critical rather than purely descriptive engagement.
- Transitions between Luther, Calvin, and Edwards are handled smoothly, allowing the reader to compare thinkers without losing the thread of the central question about God's favor.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper employs comparative theological analysis: it reads primary texts closely, extracts each thinker's position on a shared question (how the Christian can be assured of God's favor), and then maps points of agreement and divergence. The critique of Calvin in the final section shows how to move from exposition to evaluation without abandoning textual grounding.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by establishing the three Reformation premises as an analytical framework, then devotes several paragraphs to Luther's treatment of each premise. It transitions to Calvin's epistemological argument about self-knowledge and God-knowledge, then outlines the TULIP doctrine systematically. The conclusion turns critical, noting the ironic tension between Calvin's doctrine of election and his own warnings about pride and hypocrisy.
Introduction to Reformation Theology
The three main premises of Reformation theology are: (1) the sole authority of Scripture; (2) justification by faith alone; and (3) the priesthood of the believer. These were also the three main premises that steered Protestants away from the Catholic Church. In Martin Luther's text, he integrates these three elements to respond to one of the dominant theological questions of the sixteenth century: how can the Christian be assured of God's favor?
In Jonathan Edwards's A Treatise Concerning Religious Affections, Edwards considers the nature of the "affections" that solicit the favor of God. In general, he asserts that these are reliant upon the inspiration and grace of the divine rather than the human spirit. Like Luther, Edwards notes that no amount of works can create enough favor with God to result in salvation; instead, faith should be the creator of works rather than the other way around.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.