Mandatory Vaccination and Public Health: An Ethical Case
This paper examines the public health and ethical case for mandatory childhood vaccination. It begins by addressing Andrew Wakefield's thoroughly discredited claim linking vaccines to autism, identifying it as a major driver of vaccine hesitancy. The paper then outlines the serious dangers posed by rising vaccination refusal rates, including threats to herd immunity and the documented mortality and morbidity associated with preventable diseases such as measles. It briefly addresses the religious freedom counter-argument before concluding that the ethical imperative to protect the broader population justifies mandatory vaccination policy, particularly in nations with the resources to implement it.
- The Debunked Vaccine-Autism Link: Wakefield's fraud and measles mortality data
- Public Health Risks of Vaccine Refusal: Rising refusal rates and herd immunity threats
- Herd Immunity and Rising Refusal Rates: Survey data on vaccine and refusal rate trends
- Religious Freedom vs. Mandatory Vaccination: Ethical case for overriding religious exemptions
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds its argument in specific, cited statistics — measles infection rates, hospitalization figures, and refusal percentages — which give concrete weight to abstract public health claims.
- Anticipates and concisely addresses the primary counter-argument (religious freedom) before dismissing it on proportionality grounds, demonstrating awareness of the opposing position.
- Maintains a clear argumentative through-line: discredited science → measles danger → herd immunity collapse → ethical mandate, making the logical progression easy to follow.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of authoritative sourcing across disciplines — peer-reviewed pharmacology journals, applied philosophy, sociology, and the World Health Organization — to build a multi-dimensional argument. Integrating scientific, statistical, and ethical sources prevents the argument from resting on any single type of evidence.
Structure breakdown
The paper is organized into three compact paragraphs that function as discrete argumentative moves: (1) discrediting the vaccine-autism claim, (2) establishing the measurable danger of vaccine refusal including herd immunity concerns, and (3) rebutting the religious freedom objection and asserting the ethical obligation to mandate vaccination. The references section follows APA format.
The Debunked Vaccine-Autism Link
Wakefield's original claim that vaccinations are linked to autism in children "has been fully debunked," tainted with "suspicions of fraud" (Pierik, 2017, p. 221). Moreover, there has not been a single peer-reviewed study capable of substantiating Wakefield's claim, which has been called "the most damaging medical hoax of the last 100 years" (Flaherty, 2011, p. 1302). The reason why the anti-vaccination hysteria is considered a major public health crisis is because of the potential death toll that could arise from an unvaccinated public exposed to communicable diseases like measles and mumps.
An unvaccinated person has a 90% chance of becoming infected with measles; the most recent outbreak in France led to 5,000 patients being hospitalized and ten deaths (Pierik, 2016, p. 2). In fact, out of every 1,000 infected children, one or two will die and as many as fifty will contract pneumonia as a result (Pierik, 2016, p. 2).
Public Health Risks of Vaccine Refusal
Unfortunately, "the rate of not vaccinating children continues to rise and these unvaccinated children pose a risk to others who are unable to receive vaccines and compromise the core herd immunity" (Shapiro, 2016, p. 1). Herd immunity refers to the critical mass of people required to prevent an infectious disease from posing a threat. In generating concern about autism, parents are exposing their child — and the entire society — to deadly diseases.
Herd Immunity and Rising Refusal Rates
A recent survey revealed that while vaccination rates have gone up twelve percent since 2013, refusal rates have also risen from 2.5% to an astonishing four percent in 2016 (Fox, 2018). According to the World Health Organization (n.d.), one in ten infants do not receive vaccinations — including in developing countries.
References
Flaherty, D. K. (2011). The vaccine-autism connection. Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 45(10), 1302–1304.
Fox, M. (2018). Vaccine rates are up, but so are refusals. NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/vaccine-rates-are-so-are-refusals-n838811
Pierik, R. (2016). Mandatory vaccination. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 35(2), 381–398.
Pierik, R. (2017). On religious and secular exemptions: A case study of childhood vaccination waivers. Ethnicities, 17(2), 220–241.
Shapiro, Y. (2016). Vaccinations: Weighing the risks and benefits. The Science Journal of the Lander College of Arts and Sciences, 9(2). Retrieved from https://touroscholar.touro.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1049&context=sjlcas
World Health Organization. (n.d.). Vaccination coverage. http://www.who.int/gho/immunization/en/
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.