This paper examines marginalization in American history through the lens of the 1893 World's Columbian Exposition, analyzing how the fair's exhibits embodied prevailing racial hierarchies and cultural attitudes of the era. Drawing on Rydell's account of the exposition and Mae Ngai's transnational historiographical framework, the paper argues that marginalized populations — including racial minorities and immigrant communities — were simultaneously excluded from cultural power and essential to the construction of American society. The paper ultimately contends that a multidimensional, transnational approach to history better captures the contributions of these populations than traditional linear narratives.
The paper demonstrates the technique of using a contemporary historiographical lens to reinterpret a historical event. Rather than simply describing what happened at the Columbian Exposition, the writer brings in Mae Ngai's transnational framework to argue that marginalized populations were not passive victims of exclusion but active contributors whose labor and culture shaped American identity. This move — from description to reinterpretation — is a hallmark of undergraduate historical analysis.
The paper follows a funnel-then-expand structure: it opens with a broad definition of marginalization, narrows to the specific case of the 1893 Exposition and its racial contradictions, then expands outward again through Ngai's transnational lens to make a broader claim about American history. The references section cites two peer-reviewed sources in APA format, one from the Journal of American Culture and one from American Quarterly.
To be marginalized as a population means many things depending on the particular population, the geographic area, and the chronological period. Typically, marginalized populations are those that, at least in part, are excluded, powerless, considered unimportant, and often have no say in the socio-political or cultural life of the society in which they live. Over the course of the last few centuries, for instance, children have been marginalized — they were put to work as soon as possible, yet had no real political or social power. Women, too, have experienced this trend; indeed, there remain many societies in which males continue to dominate. In American history, one of the clearest examples of a marginalized population has been the various immigrant communities that, depending on the chronological period, experienced varying degrees of exclusion and hardship.
The idea of marginalization is nothing new. In the World's Columbian Exposition of 1893, as documented in an article from the Journal of American Culture, Rydell presents an overview of some of the issues surrounding the 400th anniversary of Columbus' arrival in America. The Chicago Tribune of the time hinted at exhibits being organized along evolutionary and cultural lines. One publication noted that Anglo-Saxon and Caucasian exhibits about humanity occupied one end of the spectrum, with "the negro types at the fair… represented… the barbarous or half-civilized state of a people who are a numerous and rapidly increasing class of American citizens" (Rydell, 1978, p. 270).
The real irony of this framing was that even in the late nineteenth century, America was ideologically understood to be inclusive. Certainly, after the Civil War and Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation, a new attitude about racial equality was presumed to be taking hold. Exhibitions of this type, however, are often reflective of the cultural attitudes of their era. The confluence of the so-called "White City" as a cultural paradigm seemed to confirm what D.H. Lawrence predicted — that the world can expect "always the same" from America, a nation that "refuses to hear the hum of destruction underneath… America has got to destroy…. It is [its] destiny" (Rydell, 1978, p. 272).
Yet, according to historians of the era, the exposition also served to define American culture in more progressive terms — presenting lectures and discussions by leading activists about religion, science, women's rights, and racial equality. Historian Frederick Jackson Turner famously delivered his paper on the significance of the American frontier at the fair. All of these efforts, despite the tragedy of a smallpox epidemic, attempted to portray to the world that America was on the verge of becoming the predominant nation of enlightenment — even as the fair's own exhibits contradicted that aspiration.
You’re 58% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.