This paper addresses six core marketing strategy questions spanning competitive dynamics, supply chain management, product development, and global branding. Drawing on Porter's Competitive Advantage Model, the Boston Consulting Group growth/share matrix, blue ocean strategy, and demand-driven supply chain frameworks, the paper examines how new competitors can enter mature markets, why vertical relationships outperform horizontal ones, and what factors shape new-product planning timelines. It also explores how multinational firms balance global brand strength with local market adaptation, how supermarkets use high-margin specialty departments to offset thin grocery margins, and when advertising-driven promotion is more appropriate than personal selling.
The factors that favor the success of an entirely new competitor entering a mature product-market have often been correlated to the level of research and development investment that fuels the innovation of next-generation products and services. This dynamic has certainly been the case in high-technology industries. Dr. Michael Porter's Determinants of Competitive Advantage Model is one of the most widely used frameworks for analyzing why new entrants to markets succeed in gaining significant competitive advantage. Ketels (2006) states that the Porter Model highlights the fact that new competitors entering existing markets stand the best chance of success by significantly increasing the productivity of customers through the use of new processes and technologies.
The Boston Consulting Group growth/share matrix — based on the strategic planning work completed at General Electric — also illustrates how new competitors can enter an existing mature market through aggressive substitution of underperforming products that lack differentiation and have resorted purely to price competition. The growth/share matrix and comparable models are analyzed by Proctor and Kitchen (1990), who conclude that new entrants have the advantage of redirecting mature markets through more precise alignment of product strategies to current unmet needs.
New competitors can also enter and dominate mature markets by redefining the market itself — using insights into unmet needs and concentrating on delivering entirely different, and often higher, levels of value to customers. This approach is commonly called blue ocean strategy, based on the research of W. Chan Kim and Renée Mauborgne (2005), who found through empirical analysis of mature markets that there is an inflection point at which new competitors redefine the needs of customers and, in the process, create entirely new markets. Taking an entirely different perspective on customers' substitute products and the needs they have leads to the creation of blue ocean markets, which Kim and Mauborgne define as uncontested market spaces. Together, all of these models and tools can lead to the successful introduction of new products and services into mature markets.
The majority of supply chains are vertical in design, and given the increases in speed, accuracy of information, and response times that are often making the difference in profitability across entire industries, vertical relationships are more critical than horizontal ones. What makes supply chains and their vertical relationships so important is the need to have demand — or orders — known instantly throughout the supply chain so that each contributing supplier can respond and ensure all necessary components come together to deliver the finished product on time to the customer.
The concept of the Demand Driven Supply Chain (DDSN), originally defined by AMR Research and discussed by Ledyard and Keough (2007), illustrates how the synchronization of suppliers can have an immediate financial impact on both the suppliers and the manufacturers they serve. Nokia's success with vertical integration of suppliers is detailed in research by Collin and Lorenzin (2006) and is further exemplified by the well-known supply chain synchronization aspects of the Toyota Production System (TPS).
The new-product development process is one of the most complex within any organization. It requires intensive coordination among engineering, product development, marketing, management, service, support, purchasing, procurement, and sales. With so many departments involved, companies commonly rely on cross-functional meetings to manage the process and ensure that products under development are released on time.
The first and most significant factor influencing the new-product planning process is the level of communication among these departments. The second factor is the ability of the company's marketing, engineering, and product development teams to work together to understand the direction of the markets they plan to develop products for — including expert-level knowledge of potential customers' unmet needs and the substitute processes and products currently in use. Third, a high degree of engineering collaboration during the development process is crucial, pervading everything from design documents to Computer-Aided Design (CAD) files and the resulting definition of the prototype. Fourth, tight integration with suppliers — and the ability to quickly obtain prototypes of components and subassemblies being built for the first time specifically for the product under development — is essential. A clear example is the flat plastic panels on the front of the Apple iPhone, which were created specifically for that device with specialized coatings to reduce glare while allowing full viewing of all content types. Fifth, there must be a high degree of synchronization across all of these processes and programs to create new-product development systems that are highly attuned to customer demands and reflect that demand back into the supply chain. As Burkett (2005) illustrates, achieving this synchronization is central to a successful product launch.
"Balancing global brand identity with local customization"
"How specialty departments offset low grocery margins"
"Conditions favoring advertising over personal selling"
You’re 52% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.