This essay addresses four interconnected questions in marketing strategy. It examines the cultural approach to strategy development—rooted in participative leadership—versus command-style decision-making, arguing that employee involvement improves implementation outcomes. The paper then considers how customer relationship management must adapt to modern digital environments and market segmentation. A third section challenges the view that strategy development alone determines success, emphasizing the equal importance of implementation and cross-team feedback. Finally, the essay evaluates customer power shifts across industries, noting that apparent market diversity can mask consolidated corporate ownership, as illustrated by L'Oréal's acquisition portfolio.
The cultural approach to marketing strategy can be considered as deriving from a participative or democratic leadership style, where consensus is reached from the top to lower levels of the organization. This approach is preferable because marketing strategy is an integrative part of organizational vision. Strategies developed through a cultural approach are more easily assimilated at all levels within the organization, since they express an organizational culture that everyone accepts (Huber, 2011).
However, the cultural approach does not mean that all employees should be involved in every decision or allowed to make strategic decisions unilaterally. Rather, they should be invited to express their opinions on strategies that affect them. This involvement helps management identify threats and opportunities that might otherwise go unnoticed, since frontline employees are in direct contact with conditions that senior strategists may not observe. Employees can provide important feedback on implementing marketing strategies, and by reducing barriers between those who develop the strategy and those who implement it, the company benefits from having all levels of employees working toward common objectives.
Ensuring a certain level of employee empowerment is also considered to contribute significantly to employee satisfaction, which in turn drives higher performance levels. The primary disadvantage of this approach is that it requires more time for implementation compared to other approaches.
The situations where a command approach would be preferable are contingency situations that require quick action. In such cases, involving all levels of employees in the marketing strategy process is neither practical nor necessary. In most situations, however, the cultural approach is preferable because it promotes success by incorporating feedback from all employee levels.
Many mature markets have become commoditized, and price is an important factor influencing purchasing decisions. However, price is not always the most — or only — important factor that determines whether customers purchase. It is therefore important that companies increase their efforts in customer relationship management (CRM).
The most important factors on which people base purchasing decisions include price, time, quality, and convenience, or some combination of these. Sometimes people pay higher prices for certain products simply because doing so saves time spent searching for cheaper alternatives. Others prefer to pay extra for higher quality. And some customers prioritize convenience over both price and quality. Efficient CRM identifies each customer segment's preferred purchasing factors and addresses those segments accordingly.
Companies' CRM efforts are made easier and more effective through the use of online tools, digital marketing, and social media. These methods allow companies to develop native advertising campaigns (Hallett, 2014), meaning they can identify the preferences of their customer segments and address them in ways that make the marketing campaign feel personally tailored. This significantly improves relationships between companies and their customers and increases customer loyalty.
Companies should therefore focus on intensifying their CRM efforts while also adapting them to modern environments. Tactics such as phone outreach by company representatives may not be effective for younger customer segments. Market segmentation should be applied not only to marketing strategies but also to customer relationship management initiatives.
The view that developing the marketing strategy is more important than implementing it — on the grounds that a flawed strategy makes implementation irrelevant — is not entirely convincing. The success of marketing strategies relies on both their development and their implementation. It is important to identify the areas where threats can be produced.
A marketing strategy is developed to succeed under certain conditions. But if other factors emerge and change the conditions under which the strategy must be applied, the success of its execution depends heavily on the implementation process. It is therefore important that those implementing the strategy are able to adapt it to changes driven by environmental factors. Furthermore, in cases where the development of a marketing strategy is flawed, the implementation team can provide the necessary feedback to improve it. This is why strategists and implementers should work together and communicate throughout the implementation process (Pride & Ferrell, 2010). The implementation team can also offer valuable insight into the results of the strategy's execution, enabling the strategy team to develop more effective marketing strategies in the future.
"Why implementation matters as much as development"
"Real vs. illusory customer power across markets"
You’re 63% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.