Essay Undergraduate 1,016 words

Media Coverage and Overshadowed News: 2001–2012 Elections

~6 min read
Abstract

This paper investigates how dominant news events influence media agenda-setting and the coverage of competing stories. Using 9/11 as a watershed moment, the author analyzes whether the "Summer of the Shark" would have achieved prominence without the September 11 attacks, examines news stories overshadowed during the 2004 presidential election, and reflects on potential scandals that could have affected the 2012 election outcome. The paper demonstrates that media outlets prioritize sensational or politically relevant stories over equally significant global events, with implications for public awareness and democratic discourse.

📝 How to Write This Type of Paper Writing guide — click to expand

What makes this paper effective

  • Uses concrete historical examples (shark attacks, Indian Ocean tsunami, Hurricane Sandy) to illustrate abstract media dynamics rather than relying on theory alone.
  • Structures argument across three distinct election/news cycles, showing patterns in how media prioritize stories rather than treating each case in isolation.
  • Acknowledges the role of sensationalism in news selection—recognizing that scientific breakthroughs (Human Genome Project) lose to human-interest or disaster narratives.
  • Integrates personal perspective in the final section while maintaining analytical distance, modeling reflexivity about how individual politics shape media consumption.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper employs comparative case analysis, examining three moments in U.S. media and political history to identify recurring patterns in news coverage. Rather than making sweeping claims about media bias, it documents specific editorial choices—such as CNN's decision to lead with war and terror over gay marriage in 2004—and then traces the structural reasons (sensationalism, political resonance, global magnitude) that explain those choices. This grounds media criticism in observable evidence.

Structure breakdown

The paper follows a chronological three-part framework: each section answers a specific prompt about a different time period, beginning with 2001, moving to 2004, and ending with 2012. Within each, the author identifies what story should have dominated coverage, then documents what actually did, creating a gap that invites explanation. The conclusion implicitly asks whether these gaps reflect neutral market forces or systematic distortions in how media organizations select what counts as "news."

The Summer of the Shark and 9/11's Shadow

The term "Summer of the Shark" has become a cultural joke—shorthand for the way media organizations flail about searching for their next sensational story to attract and hold viewers. The University News reported that the summer of the shark was ultimately the summer that never was. The numbers were already exaggerated, and shark attacks would not have provided a viable lead for news agencies (Keen, 2002). In fact, Keen (2002) points out that actual shark attack numbers were down that year, not up.

Despite these facts, sharks might still have dominated news coverage had the news cycle not been interrupted by September 11 terrorist attacks. In 2001, there were no groundbreaking news events remotely as significant or world-changing as the September 11 attacks on the United States. However, several smaller stories carried genuine importance. The Human Genome Project revealed the human genome sequence and released preliminary analysis on February 12, 2001 ("Top Ten World News Events of 2001," 2001). Yet the media could not and would not use such a scientific breakthrough as a lead story because it lacked sensational appeal. Instead, news organizations might have focused on the rampant destruction caused by the Gujarat earthquake in January 2001, which killed approximately 20,000 people ("Top Ten World News Events of 2001," 2001).

Other newsworthy events competed for attention in 2001. Beijing's successful bid to host the summer Olympics was historically significant. Napster generated substantial media coverage as lawsuits over intellectual property rights highlighted how file-sharing technology was challenging the entertainment industry. Climate change also produced several stories, though none singular enough to sustain prolonged public attention ("Words in the News -- Archives, 2001," n.d.). Without September 11, the media landscape would likely have shifted toward human disaster narratives or political controversy—stories with emotional resonance and clear victims—rather than scientific or economic developments.

News Coverage During the 2004 Presidential Election

The 2004 presidential election year was not as quiet as 2001 had been before September 11. Many large stories competed alongside what was widely characterized as dull campaigning between George W. Bush and Democratic challenger John Kerry. Kerry's lackluster public persona made the election cycle less compelling for viewers, a factor that may have contributed to low voter turnout and ultimately Bush's reelection.

Several high-profile deaths dominated news cycles in 2004: Ronald Reagan and Yasser Arafat received the most extensive coverage. However, these deaths were of senior political figures whose lives could be eulogized across multiple news segments rather than consuming most of the year's reporting. The war in Iraq continued to rage, as did proceedings of the Commission on 9/11. From a global perspective, the most significant event of 2004 was undoubtedly the Indian Ocean tsunami following the 9.0 earthquake, which killed an astounding 150,000 people, making it one of the most important news events of the year ("Top Ten Stories of 2004," n.d.).

Yet as CNN noted in its "Top Ten Stories of 2004" article, the debate over gay marriage was heating up during 2004 but never achieved significant news prominence due to other major world events. Coverage centered instead on terrorism, the Bush administration's war strategy, the 9/11 Commission's findings, and public anxiety about security threats. Terrorist attacks in Spain intensified global fears; even Chechen rebel activities received attention, though never as much as Al Qaeda. Deeper issues, such as how the war on terror was enabling racial profiling in the United States, also surfaced as newsworthy but remained secondary to dominant coverage of military and security concerns.

2 Locked Sections · 395 words remaining
Sign up to read these 2 sections

The 2012 Election: Scandals, the Economy, and Hurricane Sandy · 275 words

"Economy and leadership response shaped election dynamics"

Media Agenda-Setting and Democratic Awareness · 120 words

"Media patterns shape which stories reach the public"

You’re 54% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.

Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log in
130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime
Key Concepts in This Paper
Summer of the Shark Media Agenda-Setting 9/11 Attacks News Cycles Sensationalism 2004 Election War on Terror 2012 Election Hurricane Sandy Public Awareness
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2026). Media Coverage and Overshadowed News: 2001–2012 Elections. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/study-guide/media-coverage-overshadowed-news-stories-101070

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.