Meech Lake Accord: Canada's Constitutional Crisis Explained
This paper traces the origins, provisions, opposition, and ultimate failure of the Meech Lake Accord of 1987, Canada's attempt to bring Quebec into the constitutional fold following the patriation of the Constitution Act of 1982. Beginning with the British North America Act and the events leading to Quebec's exclusion from the 1982 constitution, the paper examines the five core demands Quebec presented to Prime Minister Brian Mulroney's government, the specific amendments agreed upon at Meech Lake, and the fierce opposition from women's groups, Indigenous leaders, former Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau, and provincial assemblies. It concludes by tracing the Accord's defeat in 1990 and the subsequent Charlottetown Accord referendum failure of 1992.
- Background: From the BNA Act to the Constitution Act of 1982: Canada's constitutional history before Meech Lake
- The Road to Meech Lake: Quebec's Constitutional Demands: Mulroney era and Quebec's five demands
- Key Provisions of the Meech Lake Accord: Distinct society clause and other agreed amendments
- Opposition and Controversy: Indigenous, feminist, and political opposition to the Accord
- Defeat of the Accord and Its Aftermath: Manitoba filibuster kills ratification in 1990
- The Charlottetown Accord and the End of an Era: Failed 1992 referendum and Quebec's unresolved status
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It situates the Meech Lake Accord within a coherent historical arc, beginning with the British North America Act and ending with the Charlottetown referendum, giving readers essential context rather than treating the Accord in isolation.
- Primary sources — including Prime Minister Mulroney's own address to the House of Commons and Chief Roland Crowe's letter — are quoted at length, lending authority and documentary depth to the analysis.
- The paper balances institutional and grassroots perspectives, covering opposition from federal politicians, Indigenous leaders, and women's groups alongside the procedural story of ratification and defeat.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper uses direct quotation from primary political documents to anchor its claims. Rather than paraphrasing Mulroney's announcement of the Accord, it reproduces the agreed points verbatim, then layers in scholarly and journalistic commentary to contextualize them. This technique — presenting the primary record first, then critical response — models disciplined use of source material in historical analysis.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a strict chronological structure: constitutional prehistory (BNA Act to 1982), the political context that made negotiations possible (1984 election), the Accord's specific provisions, the multi-front opposition it faced, its procedural defeat in Manitoba and Newfoundland, and finally the Charlottetown Accord as a failed sequel. Each section builds directly on the previous one, making the causal chain of events easy to follow.
Background: From the BNA Act to the Constitution Act of 1982
In order to properly examine the Meech Lake Accord and its significance, we must first look at why the Accord was necessary and what led up to it. Until 1982, Canada had been governed by the British North America Act, passed by the British Parliament in 1867. This act provided for the unification of the Canadian provinces into the Dominion of Canada and set out the powers of the provincial legislatures. All powers not designated to the provinces were given to the Dominion. Later interpretations by the British Privy Council extended property rights in the provinces and developed the doctrine of emergency powers to aid the Dominion in time of war.
Ever since the Statute of Westminster 1931, the British government had been willing to relinquish control of Canada, but Canadian federal and provincial governments were unable to agree on a new formula to allow amendments. Various unsuccessful attempts were made to change the constitution, including the Victoria Charter of 1971.
On March 25, 1982, the British Parliament passed the Canada Act, also called the Constitution Act of 1982, which made Canada a fully sovereign state. It was proclaimed by Queen Elizabeth II on April 17, 1982. Residents of Quebec had voted in May 1980 not to seek sovereignty, and Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau was pushing for the new constitution, which was finally agreed to by every province except Quebec in November 1981. This constitution combined the British North America Act of 1867 with subsequent amendments passed by the British Parliament, as well as new material resulting from eighteen months of intense negotiations between federal and provincial governments. It contained a Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which guaranteed thirty-four rights including religious freedom, minority language education, and cultural tolerance. The Charter also contained a clause allowing many rights to be overridden in federal or provincial legislatures by what became known as the "notwithstanding clause." The Act additionally recognized native treaty rights, increased the power provinces held over their natural resources, and provided an amendment formula requiring approval of two-thirds (seven) of the provinces representing at least 50% of the country's population.
Quebec opposed ratification of this constitution, claiming the right to a constitutional veto. These efforts ended in December 1982 when the Supreme Court of Canada rejected its claim, opening the way to further negotiations.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.