Mission Command Principles in Securing Dan Patan, Afghanistan
This paper examines the seven principles of mission command — competence, mutual trust, shared understanding, commander's intent, mission orders, disciplined initiative, and risk acceptance — as demonstrated by a US infantry squad in Scott J. Gaitley's case study "Securing Dan Patan." Drawing on Gaitley's account of American soldiers conducting counterinsurgency operations in an Afghan village, the paper evaluates how each principle contributed to the squad's success in building rapport with Afghan Local Police (ALP) counterparts, neutralizing insurgent threats, and enabling a sustainable transition to local security leadership. The analysis argues that adhering to all seven principles is essential for effective mission command in complex operational environments.
- Introduction: Overview of seven mission command principles and case study
- Competence: Squad competence in identifying and neutralizing threats
- Mutual Trust and Shared Understanding: Building rapport with Afghan counterparts and villagers
- Commander's Intent and Mission Orders: Executing objectives through local resources and patrols
- Disciplined Initiative and Risk Acceptance: Independent action and calculated risk in village engagement
- Conclusion: Risk-reward reasoning and lessons for mission command
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Each principle is given its own focused discussion, with a direct textual citation from Gaitley's case study to ground the analysis in concrete operational evidence.
- The paper maintains a consistent evaluative framework throughout, returning to the same source material to illustrate each of the seven principles without repetition or contradiction.
- The risk acceptance section goes beyond simple definition by explaining the cost-benefit reasoning soldiers used — acknowledging danger while demonstrating how rapport-building actively mitigated that risk.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper uses a principle-by-principle analytical scaffold drawn from Army Doctrine Publication 6-0, applying each doctrinal concept to a single case study. This structure — define, illustrate with evidence, evaluate outcome — is a reliable technique for military and policy analysis essays, allowing the writer to demonstrate both conceptual understanding and the ability to apply doctrine to real-world scenarios.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a framing introduction that previews the seven principles and introduces the Gaitley source. Six body sections follow, each corresponding to one or two principles. Sections move from individual-leader qualities (competence) through interpersonal dynamics (trust, understanding) to operational execution (intent, orders, initiative) and finally strategic risk calculus. A brief concluding paragraph synthesizes the risk acceptance discussion into a broader argument about mission success.
Introduction
When applied correctly, mission command can provide a high degree of flexibility and creativity in the execution of military operations. When applied incorrectly, however, it can lead to confusion and chaos. Accordingly, it is important for commanders to carefully consider when and how to apply the seven principles of mission command in order to achieve the desired effect on the battlefield. The seven principles are: competence, mutual trust, shared understanding, commander's intent, mission orders, disciplined initiative, and risk acceptance.
This paper analyzes and evaluates each principle with regard to Gaitley's (n.d.) "Securing Dan Patan." In "Securing Dan Patan: A US Infantry Squad's Counterinsurgency Program in an Afghan Village," Scott J. Gaitley provides an in-depth look at the US military's efforts to secure the village of Dan Patan against Taliban insurgents. He focuses on the role of a small infantry squad in carrying out a counterinsurgency program that includes building rapport between American soldiers and their Afghan Local Police (ALP) counterparts. In short, Gaitley (n.d.) shows how US forces demonstrated the principles of mission command in securing Dan Patan from the threat posed by enemy insurgents. This paper thus argues that adhering to these seven principles is essential for any leader who wishes to succeed in mission command.
Competence
Competence refers to the ability of leaders to make sound decisions and carry out their orders effectively. Leaders must be knowledgeable and possess the experience necessary to make informed decisions (Townsend et al., 2019). The US infantry squad demonstrated competence in securing Dan Patan by first identifying and then eliminating all threats in the area. One of the primary threats, as Gaitley (n.d.) points out, was the lack of rapport between US soldiers and their Afghan counterparts in the fight against the Taliban. Being able to identify that threat and neutralize it served as a major step forward in the mission.
References
Gaitley, S. J. (n.d.). Securing Dan Patan: A US infantry squad's counterinsurgency program in an Afghan village.
Mission Command (Army Doctrine Publication 6-0 [ADP 6-0], 2019, pp. 2–4).
Townsend, G. S., Crissman, M. G. D., & McCoy, M. K. (2019). Reinvigorating the Army's approach to mission command. Military Review, 6.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.