This essay argues that NATO should open its membership to all nations that wish to join, rather than restricting participation to those that meet its current criteria. The paper provides a brief overview of NATO's structure, history, and demonstrated success in mediating disputes and preventing military conflict among its members. It then contends that excluding nations — particularly those in the Middle East — creates an adversarial "us versus them" dynamic that fuels grievances and aggression. The author suggests that broader membership could compel less cooperative nations to align with NATO's standards of governance and humane treatment, ultimately contributing to global peace and stability.
With the world heating up over the American-Iraq conflict, many nations have called for the involvement of NATO. NATO, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, provides treaty mediation and rule-setting for its members (Ames, 2003). The privileges and duties of member nations are weighted by population, economic clout, and other factors. Member nations can come to NATO for mediation whenever they are dissatisfied with another nation's treatment or with actions that threaten or involve military force. NATO has been reported to be highly successful in its ventures and its purpose (Ames, 2003). It provides support as well as an outlet for grievances, which may help prevent future wars. Many wars and threats of war are started over treaty disagreements. NATO members agree to abide by the organization's decisions, which helps prevent conflicts born out of military anger (Ames, 2003).
Because NATO has proven successful, many believe it should open its membership to the entire region it serves, rather than excluding certain nations. The nations that are excluded have no reason to practice fair policies because there is no governing body to hold them accountable. In addition, many nations want to be part of NATO but do not meet its criteria for membership, which include sound economic policies, humane treatment of residents, and certain measurable capabilities.
If NATO were to open its membership to the entire region, it might prove to be the tool that forces less aggressive actions and attitudes from some of the Middle East nations that have been in conflict for years. The entrance of those nations into the organization might compel them to work toward fulfilling NATO's rules, and that in turn would go a long way toward reducing the posturing driven by perceptions of economic inequality across the world.
"List and background of original NATO member states"
"How excluding nations fuels conflict and inequality"
NATO is a fifty-year-old soother of hurt feelings and angry outbursts. It works with its members to reach peaceful solutions without war, and if war is declared, it helps set the boundaries of its conduct. It is an organization that, unlike some others, is currently more needed than ever. Allowing nations from other regions to join its ranks may be just the answer to achieving lasting world peace.
You’re 68% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.