Negative Character Traits in Flowering Judas and Barn Burning
This paper examines how negative character traits shape the narratives and themes of Katherine Anne Porter's "Flowering Judas" and William Faulkner's "Barn Burning." By analyzing Laura's emotional detachment and Braggioni's hypocrisy in Porter's story alongside Abner Snopes's defiance and authoritarianism in Faulkner's, the paper argues that darker character traits are essential to understanding personal identity, moral conflict, and broader social commentary. The study explores how these traits influence decision-making, interpersonal relationships, and thematic development, connecting individual psychology to the historical and social contexts of each work.
- Introduction: Character Negativity as Narrative Force: Negative traits define characters and their worlds
- Laura and Braggioni in Flowering Judas: Detachment and hypocrisy in Porter's revolutionaries
- Abner Snopes and Sarty in Barn Burning: Defiance, arson, and a son's moral struggle
- Research Aims and Questions: Study goals examining traits, decisions, and identity
- Thematic Connections and Social Context: Betrayal, corruption, and post-Civil War social discord
- Rationale for Studying Negative Character Traits: Why darker traits matter in literary analysis
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds its argument in specific textual evidence — Laura's dream of offering Eugenio a deadly flower and Abner's deliberate ruining of the rug — rather than relying on vague generalizations.
- It frames negative character traits not as simple flaws but as conduits between individual psychology and broader social and historical forces, which adds analytical depth.
- The contrast between Abner and Sarty is used effectively to sharpen the argument: Sarty's moral integrity makes his father's defiance more legible and meaningful.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates comparative literary analysis by reading two distinct short stories in parallel. Rather than treating each work in isolation, it identifies shared thematic concerns — betrayal, moral struggle, social discord — and shows how different authors use character negativity to arrive at similar narrative and thematic effects. This comparative structure strengthens the overall argument by revealing patterns that transcend any single text.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a thesis-framing introduction, then analyzes each story's characters in turn. It moves into a research aims section that restates specific questions the study intends to address, followed by a section linking character traits to broader themes and historical context. The rationale section closes the paper by justifying why examining negative traits matters as a mode of literary inquiry. This proposal-style structure moves from description to analysis to justification.
Introduction: Character Negativity as Narrative Force
In Katherine Anne Porter's "Flowering Judas" and William Faulkner's "Barn Burning," the central characters are portrayed with a distinctively negative style that strongly shapes each narrative's themes and conflicts. These negative traits can be read as personal flaws, but they are also essential for understanding the characters' lives, natures, identities, and decision-making, as well as the broader conflicts within each story. In a sense, their negative styles define them and also define the world around them. Digging deeper into these traits can explain much about who these characters are and what drives their conflicts.
Laura and Braggioni in Flowering Judas
In "Flowering Judas," Laura is portrayed with an intriguing blend of commitment and profound detachment. While she participates in revolutionary activities in Mexico, her interactions with others are characterized by a lack of genuine emotional engagement. Her relationship with the young revolutionary Eugenio illustrates this clearly: even though she brings him flowers, there is a symbolic coldness in her actions, as she dreams of betraying him by offering him a flower that would hasten his death. This dream reflects her subconscious awareness of her own disconnection and her possible betrayal of her revolutionary ideals.
Braggioni, the leader of the revolution in the story, embodies hypocrisy and corruption. Despite his revolutionary rhetoric, he is fundamentally self-serving and manipulative. He uses his power to dominate others, including Laura, whom he attempts to seduce as a display of control. His love of singing serenades — which should symbolize passion and rebellion — instead functions as another tool for manipulation, revealing his deep-seated vanity and moral corruption.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.