Nike's Business Strategy: How Nike Rose to Market Dominance
This paper analyzes Nike's business strategy as documented in Rikert and Christensen's Harvard Business School case study "Nike (A)." Beginning with founder Phil Knight's vision to rival Adidas using low-cost, high-quality Asian manufacturing, the paper traces Nike's evolution from Blue Ribbon Sports through its rebranding, Olympic debut, and expansion into the "ath-leisure" market. Key strategic elements examined include celebrity athlete endorsements, the "word-of-foot" marketing approach, submarket targeting, technological investment, international expansion, and the company's successful public offering. The analysis demonstrates how Nike's ability to combine performance credibility with mass-market appeal drove its dominance of the athletic footwear industry by the early 1980s.
- Introduction: Nike's shift from athletic to fashion footwear
- The Nike Strategy: Ath-leisure positioning and competitor landscape
- The Beginning Strategy: Blue Ribbon Sports, Tiger deal, and Olympic debut
- The Winning Strategy: Athlete endorsements, technology investment, and expansion
- Conclusion: Know-how and appeal as Nike's core strategy
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds every strategic claim in direct textual evidence from the case study, using short, well-integrated quotations that support rather than replace analysis.
- It moves logically from market context to founding strategy to marketing execution, giving the argument a clear causal arc.
- Competitor comparisons (Adidas, Puma, New Balance) are used effectively to highlight Nike's distinctive positioning rather than merely listing rivals.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of a single primary source — a Harvard Business School case study — to construct a layered business analysis. Rather than simply summarizing the case, it organizes the material thematically around strategic decisions, drawing connections between Nike's founding philosophy, manufacturing choices, marketing methods, and market outcomes. This technique is useful for any case-study-based business essay.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a brief contextual introduction establishing the thesis, then divides the body into three named sections: an overview of Nike's market positioning strategy, a narrative of the company's founding and early moves, and an examination of the marketing and expansion tactics that cemented Nike's dominance. A short conclusion synthesizes the key strategic lessons. Each section is focused on a distinct phase or dimension of Nike's strategy.
Introduction
In the 1970s, Nike developed a strategy that broadened its base from specialized athletic footwear to popular consumer-based fashion footwear. By the 1980s, Nike footwear had dominated the market, appearing on the feet of everyone from American youths to Olympic runners. Nike's strategy was to combine serious technology with the popular taste for casual wear and comfort. As David C. Rikert and C. Roland Christensen report, "Running was never the lifeblood of running shoe sales. Comfort was" (Rikert & Christensen, 1990, p. 3). This paper analyzes Nike's strategy and explains why it proved so successful.
Reference List
Rikert, D. C., & Christensen, C. R. (1990). Nike (A). Harvard Business School, pp. 1–31.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.