How Non-Incumbent Candidates Win Presidential Elections
This paper examines the challenges and strategic considerations facing non-incumbent presidential candidates in the United States. Beginning with an overview of incumbency advantages—including name recognition, campaign finance access, and control over party convention logistics—the paper outlines the multi-stage process a non-incumbent must navigate to secure both a party nomination and a general election victory. Key strategies discussed include building brand identity through media engagement, forming political alliances, selecting a strong running mate, and understanding the mechanics of the Electoral College. The 2016 presidential election cycle serves as a contextual backdrop throughout the analysis.
- The Power of Incumbency in Presidential Races: Incumbency advantages and how they shape presidential campaigns
- Building Brand Recognition and Media Visibility: Media strategy and visibility for non-incumbent hopefuls
- Strategic Alliances and the Primary Process: Using caucuses and alliances to build voter support
- Selecting a Running Mate and Securing the Nomination: Choosing a vice presidential pick to strengthen the ticket
- Campaigning for the General Election and the Electoral College: General election dynamics and Electoral College mechanics
- Conclusion: Timing, Branding, and the Non-Incumbent's Path to Victory: Synthesis of key factors for non-incumbent success
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper clearly contrasts incumbents and non-incumbents, giving readers an immediate framework for understanding the structural disadvantages at play.
- It follows a logical chronological structure that mirrors the actual stages of a presidential campaign, from announcement through the general election.
- Cited sources are integrated directly into the argument to support key claims, lending credibility to assertions about delegate selection and convention timing.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied political analysis by using a real-world example (the 2016 election) as a recurring reference point to ground abstract strategic claims. This technique—anchoring broad generalizations in a specific, well-known case—helps readers connect theoretical campaign strategy to actual political circumstances.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by defining incumbency and its structural advantages, then moves sequentially through three numbered strategic stages for non-incumbents: building visibility, forming alliances, and competing in the general election. Each stage addresses a distinct phase of the campaign calendar. The paper closes with a brief synthesis reinforcing the twin themes of timing and branding.
The Power of Incumbency in Presidential Races
An incumbent is the existing holder of a political office who normally has a structural advantage over challengers during an election ("The Power of Incumbency" 1). In the House of Representatives, incumbents win over 80% of their elections ("The Power of Incumbency" 1). For the presidential race, the power of incumbency is different and, in many ways, weaker due to term limits and the nature of the executive office. Anti-incumbency sentiment can haunt presidents who, for whatever exogenous or endogenous factors, presided over a difficult term. Prevailing party fatigue can also be a factor that boosts the chances of a non-incumbent from the opposing political party. In the case of presidential elections taking place after a two-term presidency—such as in 2016—there is no incumbent, and therefore the process by which hopefuls win their party's nomination becomes the focal point of their campaign work.
Incumbents enjoy obvious advantages over their non-incumbent counterparts, including name and brand recognition, access to campaign finance, access to state party leaders, and even access to government resources "that can be indirectly used to boost a campaign" ("The Power of Incumbency" 1). One of the most important means of boosting a presidential campaign is through party conventions and committee chairs, and incumbents clearly hold the advantage in these scenarios. Convention dates can even be "manipulated to the benefit of the incumbent" and held relatively late so as to be "after those of the opposition party," aiding the building of "momentum for the upcoming general election campaign" (Nelson 949). Likewise, the location of the convention may boost the chances of the incumbent's being selected as the nominee. Non-incumbent candidates and presidential hopefuls must therefore remain vigilant throughout the lengthy pre-election process in order to secure a better chance of earning their party's nomination.
Works Cited
McLaughlin, Dan. "History is not on the Democrats' Side in 2016." The Federalist. Retrieved online: http://thefederalist.com/2014/09/04/history-is-not-on-the-democrats-side-in-2016/
Nelson, Michael. Guide to the Presidency and the Executive Branch. Fifth Edition. Los Angeles: Sage, 2013.
"The Power of Incumbency." Boundless. Retrieved online:
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.