Nonverbal Communication: Functions, Effectiveness & Listening
This paper examines nonverbal communication from multiple academic perspectives, drawing on scholars including Mark Frank, Michael Fielding, Phil Burnard, and Krizan et al. It outlines the primary functions of nonverbal communication—defining context, regulating conversation, and serving as the message itself—before distinguishing effective nonverbal behaviors (eye contact, appropriate gesture, professional appearance) from ineffective ones (poor attire, stiff posture, avoidance of eye contact). The paper also addresses the critical role of listening in healthcare and counseling settings, introducing Burnard's three-part listening framework and the SOLER acronym. The discussion concludes by emphasizing that nonverbal communication skills are essential across virtually all professional and interpersonal contexts.
- Introduction to Nonverbal Communication: Functions, social rules, and emotional expression
- Effective and Ineffective Nonverbal Communication: Eye contact, appearance, gesture, and silence
- The Importance of Listening: Healthcare listening skills and the SOLER model
- Conclusion: Nonverbal skills matter across all professions
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Integrates multiple credible academic sources to support each major claim, lending the essay scholarly authority despite its relatively brief length.
- Uses concrete, relatable examples—such as a student wearing flip-flops to a class presentation—to illustrate abstract concepts like ineffective nonverbal communication.
- Applies concepts to a specific professional domain (healthcare) while noting their broader relevance, demonstrating transferable thinking.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper consistently pairs a general principle with a specific illustrative example before citing the source. This "claim → example → citation" pattern, used throughout, is a reliable and readable structure for evidence-based academic writing. The introduction of the SOLER acronym as an applied framework is a good example of using a mnemonic device to organize and communicate scholarly content accessibly.
Structure breakdown
The essay opens by defining nonverbal communication and outlining its three core functions per Frank (2012). It then addresses social rules and emotional leakage, before pivoting to a comparison of effective versus ineffective nonverbal behaviors across appearance, gesture, and eye contact. A dedicated section on listening skills introduces Burnard's three-part framework and the SOLER model. A brief conclusion ties the argument back to professional relevance. The Works Cited page follows MLA formatting conventions.
Introduction to Nonverbal Communication
The functions of nonverbal communication, according to Professor Mark Frank, include three primary roles. First, nonverbal communication defines the setting for communication by "providing the backdrop for communication"—for example, a dimly lit room signals that communication should be subdued, while a brightly lit room with cheerful colors invites loud talking, laughter, and even frivolity. Second, nonverbal communication can "regulate" how verbal communication takes place; when a listener nods to indicate understanding, it cues the speaker to continue. Third, nonverbal communication "can be the message itself": a simple smile indicates acceptance or happiness, a wave means goodbye, raising an index finger suggests "we're number one," and raising a finger to one's lips means please be quiet (Frank, 2012, pp. 6–7).
Professor Frank (Director of the Communication Science Center) points out that there are social rules governing the nonverbal communication of touch. Teachers do not hug students, but if a student has just been granted an important scholarship, that rule can be appropriately suspended and a congratulatory hug becomes acceptable. A male instructor would not ethically touch a female student on her back, but he might touch her on her "forearm" when making a point about an essay that needed additional editing (Frank, 2012, p. 8).
Facial expressions can give away a person who is trying to remain calm "and mature" about the recent death of a pet; the voice tone and facial expression "often unintentionally communicate sadness," Frank explains (p. 8). Nonverbal communication is "less controllable" than verbal communication because, for example, the beginning of a smile can appear on a person's face in a situation that clearly does not call for overt laughter, giving that person away to those who catch it (Frank, p. 9).
Effective and Ineffective Nonverbal Communication
Effective nonverbal communication entails the proper use of facial expressions, body language, hands and arms, head nods, and good listening patterns. A speaker who makes consistent eye contact is utilizing strong nonverbal communication skills. However, nonverbal communication can be "ambiguous," and in that context it may not be effective. For example, first impressions are not always accurate, and judging people based solely on a first impression—using another person's nonverbal cues observed at a glance—can be short-sighted. The meaning of nonverbal communication must be judged "from the total context" (Fielding, 2006, p. 119).
Silence can also be misunderstood. If a person is listening to another speak but says nothing purely out of shyness, the speaker may mistake that silence for rudeness, boredom, or lack of respect—making silence an ineffective form of nonverbal communication in such cases (Fielding, p. 121). Similarly, failing to make eye contact is an example of ineffective nonverbal communication: if a speaker looks only at their notes and nowhere near the audience, that too is an ineffective use of nonverbal communication (Fielding, p. 124).
Physical appearance is itself a form of nonverbal communication. A student giving a final presentation in a university speech class while wearing cut-off jeans, a t-shirt with a beer logo, and flip-flops offers a classic example of ineffective nonverbal skills. Speaking in front of others in sloppy attire makes it difficult for that person "to be taken seriously," according to Krizan et al. Meanwhile, a student who stands in front of a class without using any gestures—arms rigidly at the sides or shuffling papers—"may be perceived as boring, uncomfortable or nervous," which is another instance of ineffective nonverbal communication (Krizan, 2010, p. 456).
Conclusion
There are experts who say nonverbal communication is every bit as important—and in some cases more important—than verbal communication. It benefits students who plan careers in fields that involve communication (and really all fields) to learn the dos and don'ts of good nonverbal communication. In particular, making a good first impression—whether in a job interview or in a public presentation—depends largely on body language, attire, and other nonverbal communication cues.
Works Cited
Burnard, Phil. Effective Communication Skills for Health Professionals: Second Edition. Nelson Thornes, 1997.
Fielding, Michael. Effective Communication in Organisations. Juta and Company LTD, 2006.
Frank, Mark G., Hyi Hwang, and David Matsumoto. Nonverbal Communication: Science and Applications. SAGE Publications, 2012.
Krizan, Buddy A.C., Patricia Merrier, Joyce P. Logan, and Karen Schneiter Williams. Business Communication. Cengage Learning, 2010.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.