Nursing Rounds and Call Light Use: An Evidence-Based Proposal
This evidence-based nursing proposal investigates the relationship between structured hourly nursing rounds and patient outcomes in acute care settings. Using a PICOT framework, the paper asks whether non-ambulatory patients who have access to both call lights and hourly nursing rounds experience greater satisfaction, fewer falls, and fewer pressure ulcers than those relying on call lights alone over a six-month period. Drawing on literature spanning nursing shortages, mandatory overtime, patient perception of care, and Jean Watson's Theory of Human Caring, the proposal outlines a full implementation plan — including project management, staff training, and data collection — alongside an evaluation and dissemination strategy for sharing results with stakeholders and the broader scholarly community.
- Introduction and PICOT Framework: Defines PICOT question on nursing rounds and call lights
- Problem Description: Staffing pressures and gaps in nursing research
- Solution Description: Hourly rounds supported by Watson's caring theory
- Implementation Plan: Project management, training, and data collection steps
- Evaluation Plan: Survey, turnover, and revenue metrics for outcomes
- Dissemination Plan: Memos, press releases, and conference presentations
- Review of Literature: Key studies on call lights, rounds, and patient outcomes
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The PICOT framework is clearly defined and consistently referenced throughout the proposal, anchoring every section to a structured research question with identifiable variables and a measurable time horizon.
- The proposal integrates a theoretical foundation — Jean Watson's Theory of Human Caring — to provide humanistic rationale alongside the empirical evidence, giving the argument both clinical and philosophical grounding.
- Each section (problem, solution, implementation, evaluation, dissemination) builds logically on the previous one, demonstrating a full project lifecycle rather than just a literature review.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates disciplined use of the PICOT question structure as an organizational scaffold for an evidence-based practice proposal. Rather than simply summarizing research, it situates published findings within each stage of a practical intervention — showing how academic evidence translates directly into policy and workflow change recommendations.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an introduction that contextualizes call light use and nursing rounds, then presents the full PICOT question. A problem description follows, detailing staffing pressures and gaps in existing research. The solution section proposes hourly nursing rounds supported by Watson's theory. Subsequent sections cover implementation logistics, evaluation methods, and dissemination strategies. The paper closes with a review of key supporting literature from nursing journals and health policy sources.
Introduction and PICOT Framework
The utilization of call lights in hospital settings has recently come under study as a function of various aspects of nursing, including staff shortages, nursing rounds, and analyses of patient outcomes. The proper scheduling of nursing rounds may be essential to enhancing nurses' ability to address common or ordinary patient needs — relative to more urgent needs that should represent the primary purpose of call light use. Beyond patients' general well-being and safety while hospitalized, nursing staff are also concerned with patient satisfaction. On a fundamental level, hospital environments that give patients peace of mind allow them to heal more quickly; these patients are more likely to communicate with less stress, and are better positioned to distinguish between their desires and genuine needs while in their hospital beds.
The implementation of frequent, regular nursing rounds may address patient anxiety on two fronts: the meeting of their needs and the prioritization of their comfort by nursing staff. Regular nursing rounds also help hospitals establish a degree of predictability that can function as a coping mechanism during longer or difficult hospital stays. The PICOT framework structures the following inquiry based on evidence-based studies:
P = Patient Problem/Population
I = Intervention
C = Comparison
O = Outcome
T = Time
P = Patients (non-ambulatory) in acute care
I = Call light use and hourly nurse rounds
C = Call light use only
O = Improved patient satisfaction, decrease in number of falls, and decrease in number of pressure ulcers
T = 6-month period
The PICOT question reads: Will non-ambulatory patients in acute care (P) who have access to both call lights and frequent, regular nursing rounds (I), compared to patients in acute care who use only call lights (C), exhibit greater patient satisfaction, fewer falls, and fewer pressure ulcers (O) during the six-month period following implementation of the intervention (T)? The literature supports the conclusion that institutionalizing regular nursing rounds plays a significant role in reducing call light use, which in turn substantially increases overall patient satisfaction.
Problem Description
The utilization of call lights has come under increasing scrutiny due to its relationship to changing conditions in both medicine and hospital-based healthcare delivery. The nursing workforce has fluctuated constantly for many years, as have the financial resources available to adequately staff medical institutions. The changed financial structure of private hospitals has meant greater operational oversight aimed at cost savings, along with increased stockholder focus on financial returns. Further complicating this problem is the limited body of evidence-based research on the impact of different nursing round arrangements on patient outcomes and nursing staff well-being.
Several available studies of patient outcomes have revealed that mandatory overtime leads to poorer patient safety and well-being (ANA, 2006; AACN, 2001; Bae, 2010, 2013; Meade, 2006; Saleh, 2011; Trinkoff, 2006). Mandatory overtime for nurses is strongly linked to chronic fatigue, overwork, and job dissatisfaction. Job satisfaction, in turn, is tied to the degree to which professionals feel that their employers and the broader work environment support them in doing their jobs effectively.
In a hospital setting that overworks nursing staff, call light use by patients may be perceived as an unwanted burden — a system prone to misuse by non-ambulatory patients. The perceptions of patients and those of the nursing staff may diverge significantly when it comes to the quality dimension involving the regularity and promptness with which routine needs are met (Nguyen, 2002; Gonzalez-Valentin et al., 2005).
Solution Description
Scheduling hourly nursing rounds may be essential to nurses' ability to address common and ordinary patient wants and needs, as distinct from more urgent situations that genuinely warrant call light use. Meade et al. (2006) conducted a study on call light use across twenty-two hospitals and found that patients activated call lights for the following reasons: room amenities; non-serious health or personal issues; secondary medical reasons; and miscellaneous or no apparent reason. The majority of these reasons are routine and can be better addressed through properly scheduled nursing rounds.
Beyond patients' general well-being and safety, nursing staff are equally concerned with patient satisfaction. Operational changes that increase the frequency of nursing rounds can have a significant impact on the quality of patient-care management, improve patient safety, and raise satisfaction levels among patients and their families.
It is essential that nurses possess both personal and clinical skills. Creating and sustaining a disciplined schedule for hourly nursing rounds tends to be productive in decreasing falls, reducing call light use, and increasing patient satisfaction. A substantial body of evidence supports this position. Jean Watson's Theory of Human Caring, for example, offers a solid rationale on which to build this model. The theory provides a personal approach that explains the practical effectiveness of nurses' caring framework, relying on the notion that a loving and compassionate approach in clinical settings enhances the quality of patient care. Watson's ultimate goal is to infuse "heart-centered" practice into the habitually stressful environment of hospitals and clinics.
References
American Nurses Association (ANA). (2006). Assuring patient safety: The employer's role in promoting healthy nursing work hours for registered nurses in all roles and settings. Retrieved from http://nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ThePracticeofNursing/workplaceNurse
American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN). (2001, March 3). Mandatory overtime. Retrieved from
Bae, S. (2010). Mandatory overtime regulations and nurse overtime. Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice, 11(2), 99–107.
Bae, S-H. (2013). Presence of nurse mandatory overtime regulations and nurse and patient outcomes. Nursing Economics, 31(2), 59–68. Retrieved from http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/806796
Deitrick, L. M., Baker, K., Paxton, H., et al. (2012). Hourly rounding: The challenges in implementation of the evidence-based process. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 27(1), 13–19.
Forsyth, D. M., & Wyatt, T. L. W. (2010). Disseminating evidence-based practice projects: Poster design and evaluation. Clinical Scholars Review, 3(1), 14–21. http://doi.org/10.1891/1939-2095.3.1.14
Ellis, E. (2014). Hourly nurse rounds help to reduce falls, pressure ulcers, and call light use, and contribute to rise in patient satisfaction. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Gonzalez-Valentin, A., et al. (2005). Journal of Holistic Nursing, 19(1), 5–21.
Lisa, B. A., & Karen, M. S. (2015). Effectiveness of structured hourly nurse rounding on patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 30(2), 153–159.
Meade, C. M., Bursell, A. L., & Ketelsen, L. (2006). Effects of nursing rounds on patients' call light use, satisfaction, and safety. American Journal of Nursing, 106(9), 58–70.
Myers, P., & Barnes, J. (2004, December). Sharing evaluation findings: Disseminating the evidence. National Evaluation of Sure Start, 30.
Nguyen, T. P., et al. (2002). Factors determining inpatient satisfaction with care. Social Science & Medicine, 54(4), 493–504.
Saleh, B. S., Nusair, H., Al Zubadi, N., Al Shloul, S., & Saleh, U. (2011, June). The nursing rounds system: Effect on patients' call light use, bed sores, falls, and satisfaction level. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 17(3), 299–303. doi:10.1111/j.1440-172X.2011.01938.x
Saleh, B. S., Nusair, H., Al Zubadi, N., Al Shloul, S., & Saleh, U. (2013). The nursing rounds system: Effect of patient's call light use, bed sores, fall and satisfaction level (Retraction of vol. 17, pg. 299, 2011). International Journal of Nursing Practice, 19(1), 108.
Tea, C., Ellison, M., & Feghali, F. (2008). Proactive patient rounding to increase customer service and satisfaction on an orthopaedic unit. Orthopaedic Nursing, 27, 233–240.
Trinkoff, A., Geiger-Brown, J., Brady, B., Lipscomb, J., & Muntaner, C. (2006). How long and how much are nurses now working? Too long, too much, and without enough rest between shifts. American Journal of Nursing, 106(4), 60–71.
Van Handel, K., & Krug, B. (1994). Prevalence and nature of call light requests on an orthopaedic unit. Orthopaedic Nursing, 13(1), 13–18.
Wyatt, S., Finn, R., Wadhwa, K., et al. (2013). Policy recommendations for open access to research data in Europe. RECODE.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.