Organizational Culture and Ethics: The Enron Case
This paper analyzes organizational culture through the lens of the Enron scandal, exploring how leadership values and corporate ethics shape workplace environments. Using Edgar Schein's framework for understanding organizational culture, the author compares healthy military squadron cultures with Enron's toxic "win at all costs" environment. The paper examines how CEO Jeff Skilling's competitive ethos, high-turnover hiring practices, and reward systems bred unethical behavior, and argues that Human Resource Management failed to establish ethical guardrails. The paper concludes that early HR intervention and ethical leadership modeling could have prevented Enron's collapse and offers lessons for building cultures based on shared values and accountability.
- Understanding Organizational Culture: Theory and definition of organizational culture
- Enron's Ethical Collapse: How Enron's merger and leadership bred toxic competitive culture
- Leadership Accountability and the Failure to Model Values: What leadership should have done versus ethical failures
- The Missing Role of Human Resources: HR's responsibility to safeguard organizational ethics
- Lessons and Conclusions: Key takeaways and lessons for preventing future scandals
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Uses concrete organizational comparison (military squadrons) to illustrate how culture varies by mission and context, grounding abstract theory in lived experience.
- Traces Enron's ethical decline to specific leadership decisions and structural choices (merger dynamics, hiring practices, reward systems) rather than treating collapse as inevitable.
- Applies Dr. Toner's Six Ethical Tests as a practical framework to show what Enron leadership failed to consider, bridging theory and accountability.
- Acknowledges the author's own observations from military service, lending credibility and perspective to the analysis.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of case study analysis to test a theoretical framework. Rather than merely describing Enron's collapse, the author uses Schein's definition of organizational culture as a lens through which to examine specific decisions (the merger, hiring strategy, reward structures) and their cultural consequences. This approach shows how organizational theory explains real-world outcomes and executive failures.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a clear problem-solution arc: it opens with the observation that organizational climate varies, defines organizational culture theoretically, illustrates healthy culture in military contexts, diagnoses Enron's specific cultural pathologies, identifies leadership failures to model ethics, and calls for HR intervention. Each section builds evidence that poor organizational culture leads to unethical behavior, culminating in a call for preventive HR practices. The conclusion ties findings back to military examples, reinforcing that ethical culture is both achievable and necessary.
Understanding Organizational Culture
There are good companies to work for, and there are ones that are not. Even within the Air Force, I have worked in squadrons where the organizational climate was positive, people had a sense of purpose, and felt they contributed to the overall success of the organization. However, I have also been in squadrons where tension was created between two sections because leadership favored one over the other, solely because one section aligned more closely with their way of thinking than the other.
The same dynamics occur in the civilian world. Within organizations, leadership can favor certain people over others, creating an environment of hostility and unhealthy competition—especially when that behavior is encouraged from the top. I believe this is what happened at Enron, and why they experienced an epic downfall that has become the textbook example of how not to run an organization.
According to Edgar H. Schein's 1984 article "Coming to a New Awareness of Organizational Culture," organizational culture is defined as the pattern of basic assumptions that a given group has invented, discovered, or developed in learning to cope with its problems of external adaptation and internal integration, and that have worked well enough to be considered valid, and therefore to be taught to new members as the correct way to perceive, think, and feel in relation to those problems (p. 3). In practical terms, this means that organizational culture is the shared beliefs about how an organization will feel, act, educate, and develop everyone—both seasoned employees and newcomers.
The difference in organizational culture is visible even in the military from squadron to squadron. In a Security Forces Squadron, the culture emphasizes strict adherence to standards, tough discipline, and an alpha-dog atmosphere. This makes sense given that security forces personnel are the defenders of an installation; they serve as police officers who deal with crime and must be prepared for serious situations. They are hard on themselves and each other but also take care of one another. When you enter a security forces squadron, you feel a high sense of pride in what they do, but you also know not to cross them.
By contrast, a Force Support Squadron has a distinctly different organizational culture. That environment is more customer-oriented, softer-spoken, and less stern than security forces. There is still pride and adherence to standards, but the atmosphere is less tense because of the type of customers they serve. Both squadrons have vision and mission statements that guide where they want to be and how they will get there. These statements are translated down to each flight and section so that everyone understands how they fit into the overall picture. The statements serve as guides on how to act and interact with each other while accomplishing the mission. Leadership buys in by having the commander model and exemplify the squadron's values.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.