This paper examines the key factors that shape organizational culture, with a focus on managerial orientation, gender accommodation, and the challenges facing public sector agencies. Drawing on Shafritz, Stivers, and Van Wart, the paper argues that effective management requires clear role delegation, consistency, and sensitivity to diversity. It explores how the glass ceiling, sexual harassment, and patriarchal workplace norms disadvantage women and undermine positive organizational culture. The paper also addresses how public perception of government inefficiency reflects deeper cultural dynamics within public agencies, and concludes that organizational structure — not individual achievement — is the primary driver of a healthy, functional workplace culture.
The paper demonstrates effective synthesis across multiple sources. Rather than treating each text in isolation, the writer weaves Shafritz's management principles, Stivers's gender analysis, and Van Wart's public sector critique into a single, unified argument about what shapes organizational culture. This cross-source synthesis is a hallmark of undergraduate academic writing in public administration and organizational theory.
The paper opens with a broad definition of organizational culture before narrowing progressively: from managerial functions and role delegation, to gender accommodation and the glass ceiling, to the specific challenges of public sector culture. Each section builds on the last, culminating in a conclusion that repositions the organizational structure — rather than any individual — as the foundation of cultural outcomes. The progression from abstract to applied is well-managed throughout.
The success of a business depends largely on the tenor set by its ownership, management, and personnel in concert with the goals of its mission and the administrative nature of its operation. This shapes what is known as a company's organizational culture — the general tone in which communication, production, and innovation are fostered, either toward the achievement or failure of desired outcomes. A positive organizational culture thrives on the strength of a shared motivation, evident team effectiveness, and a core of qualified and respected leaders. These conditions make a company both a functional business and a potentially rewarding place to work.
For employees, the opportunity to work in an environment where learning new things is essential to day-to-day business is often a significant driving force. Organizational culture is a somewhat abstract but omnipresent concept defining the behavior, expectations, and experiences of all who operate within and come into engagement with an organization. The research presented here reveals that organizational culture is impacted by a broad array of factors, including the orientation of management, the accommodation of diversity such as gender differences, and the degree to which positive rather than negative aspects of the broader culture are reflected within the organization.
First and foremost, managerial orientation plays a substantial part in defining organizational culture. As Shafritz observes, "the managerial function finds its only outlet through the members of the organization (body corporate). Whilst the other functions bring into play material and machines, the managerial function operates only on the personnel." (Shafritz, 48) Without question, this is a defining aspect of an organization's culture: managerial orientation impacts the experience of personnel, directs the activities of teams, and guides the organization through its own challenges. Moreover, the manager is the channel through which administrative goals and visions are passed to the rest of the organization, meaning that this position carries a significant degree of influence over the realization of a desired organizational culture.
One of the keys to a positive managerial orientation is the capacity to delegate responsibility while simultaneously establishing consistency within the company. This consistency is a key outcome of positive organizational culture, with roles, goals, and procedural norms defined clearly enough to reduce confusion, frustration, and disagreement. As the Shafritz text notes, "the object of division of work is to produce more and better work with the same effort. The worker always on the same part, the manager concerned always with the same matters, acquire an ability, sureness and accuracy which increase their output." (Shafritz, 48) Creating an environment where these conditions are present contributes significantly to personnel's sense that they are part of a functional entity that values their contributions and channels them toward consistent, organized ends.
The features defining organizational culture extend well beyond the conduct of responsibilities and the definition of roles. The human elements of organizational culture are most central. Issues such as diversity, multicultural communication, and gender differences impact the makeup of a company, and the degree to which a company accommodates and treats these differences with sensitivity becomes a defining feature of its organizational culture. For the purposes of this discussion, gender accommodation serves as a key determinant of organizational culture.
Stivers (2002) recognizes that "while much gender-oriented research has documented perceived differences in male and female behavior as well as men's and women's expectations about how each sex will behave in particular situations, relatively little thought has been given to what difference these differences may make: what they imply for women's careers and organizational experiences versus those of men." (Stivers, 24) This is a factor that significantly impacts organizational culture, as the degree to which gender realities are accommodated or disregarded will weigh heavily on the experience of both men and women in the workplace.
This introduces the distinct challenges of managing diversity in the workplace, both in relation to women specifically and to the broader premise of contending with distinguishing cultural features and ideals. Fitting these within the context of an overarching company culture can be challenging, reinforcing the need for a culture that is welcoming and comfortable for all. The concept of the glass ceiling, which still persists today, challenges workplace administrators to find ways to bridge gaps created by gender expectations, social inequalities, and the presence of sexual harassment. These are all symptoms of a glass ceiling that either institutionally blocks women from opportunities equal to those of their male counterparts or actively intimidates women from pursuing advancement. At the root of each symptom is the problem of gender role expectation operating in an imbalanced context.
Even today, social and cultural expectations are often inextricable from what we perceive to be particularly male or particularly female in quality or characteristic. As Stivers notes, "both men and women professionals in organizations seek to deny the existence of sexual harassment. Nevertheless, her research suggested that such incidents are widespread and that most go unreported, frequently because women are apt to blame themselves when men at work make overtures." (Stivers, 25)
Where this occurs, there is clearly a dual cultural conflict for the organization — one that correlates both to a company-wide culture of denial and, worse, to a culture that inherently allows the type of treatment that renders the workplace hostile and discomforting for women. Such a cultural problem may be traced to the failure of administration and management to encourage a positive culture, to diminish or remove this negative presence from the company, and to accommodate the needs of those who have experienced unwanted sexual or gender-based harassment from co-workers.
It is not uncommon for organizational culture to reflect the cultural identity of the sector or national culture in which it operates. As this discussion demonstrates, this is true in the United States, where an ideologically informed hierarchy creates a business atmosphere in which status elevation may often beget a hard-won sense of personal achievement. Within the context of business, however, it is crucial that this sense not be distorted to suggest that any single individual can make decisions impacting an entire organization alone. It is, in fact, the organizational structure that is responsible for facilitating the desired culture.
Shafritz, J. J., Ott, S., & Jang, Y. S. (2005). Classics of Organization Theory, 6th Ed. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
Stivers, C. (2002). Gender Images in Public Administration: Legitimacy and the Administrative State, 2nd Ed. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
Van Wart, M. (1998). Changing Public Sector Values. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.