Patton's Mission Command at the Siege of Bastogne
This essay examines General George S. Patton's employment of mission command during the Siege of Bastogne in 1944–1945. Drawing on Army doctrine (ADRP 5-0) and historical sources, the paper traces how Patton understood his operational environment, visualized courses of action, exercised disciplined initiative, and inspired subordinates to execute a bold northward relief effort. Key episodes analyzed include Patton's rapid 90-degree reorientation of the Third Army, his controversial three-day plan presented at Verdun, and the flanking maneuver that broke the German encirclement and relieved the 101st Airborne Division.
- Introduction: Patton and Mission Command: Defines mission command and establishes Patton's mastery of it
- Background: The Siege of Bastogne: Context of the German assault on Bastogne, Belgium
- Rapid Reorientation and Aggressive Action: Patton pivots Third Army 90 degrees toward Bastogne
- Understanding the Mission and Operational Environment: Patton assesses conditions and commits to relief operation
- Visualization, Planning, and Disciplined Initiative: Verdun conference and Patton's bold three-day plan
- Breaking the Encirclement: Tactics and Execution: Flanking maneuver relieves 101st Airborne at Bastogne
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds analysis in Army doctrine (ADRP 5-0) while applying it concretely to a specific historical operation, keeping the argument focused and relevant.
- Uses direct quotations from both primary-adjacent sources (Morelock, Harvey) and Patton himself to support each analytical claim.
- Moves logically from context-setting (who Patton was, what Bastogne was) through specific mission command behaviors to the tactical outcome, creating a clear cause-and-effect structure.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper models doctrine-to-case analysis: it defines a concept (mission command) using an authoritative doctrinal source, then systematically identifies how a historical actor's decisions and behaviors satisfy each element of that definition. This approach is common in military professional education and demonstrates the ability to bridge theory and historical evidence.
Structure breakdown
The essay opens with a doctrinal definition of mission command and positions Patton as an early practitioner. It then introduces the Bastogne scenario and walks through Patton's actions in roughly chronological order — reorientation of the Third Army, the Verdun planning conference, visualization and intent-sharing with subordinates, and finally the flanking maneuver that broke the encirclement. The conclusion is embedded in the final paragraph's outcome description rather than a separate section.
Introduction: Patton and Mission Command
As a military leader, General George S. Patton is remembered for remarkable accomplishments. His approach to leadership has led many to speculate that he was ahead of his time. In many ways, Patton can also be remembered for his excellent application of what is now referred to as mission command. In basic terms, mission command concerns "the exercise of authority and direction by the commander using mission orders to enable disciplined initiative within the commander's intent to empower agile and adaptive leaders in the conduct of Unified Land Operations" (Department of the Army [ADRP 5-0], 2012, p. 1-1).
It is important to note that throughout his tenure as a general, Patton made extensive use of mission command and effectively employed the operations process in this endeavor. In essence, Patton could, in all engagements, "understand his assigned mission, and he sought to build and maintain his understanding of the operational environment and the problem." Patton's competency in applying mission command and the operational process was displayed in most of his engagements — as was evidenced in the Siege of Bastogne in 1944 and 1945.
Background: The Siege of Bastogne
The Siege of Bastogne took place in the Belgian town of Bastogne, where German forces clashed with American forces in a sustained effort to seize a town of great strategic relevance. Control of Bastogne would have provided Germany a critical pathway to expand northward (Barron, 2015). At the time of the German invasion, the town was under the active protection of American forces, under the leadership of Brigadier General Anthony C. McAuliffe, who during the sustained seven-day German assault faced the real prospect of surrender. Then entered Patton — a battle-hardened general whose mission was to relieve the besieged forces in this strategic town.
References
Barron, L. (2015). Patton at the Battle of the Bulge: How the General's Tanks Turned the Tide at Bastogne. New York, NY: Penguin Publishing Group.
Department of the Army. (2012). ADRP 5-0: The Operations Process. Washington, DC: Department of the Army.
Harvey, R. (2008). Maverick military leaders: The extraordinary battles of Washington, Nelson, Patton, Rommel, and others. New York, NY: Skyhorse Publishing.
Morelock, J. D. (2015). Generals of the Bulge: Leadership in the U.S. Army's Greatest Battle. Stackpole Books.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.