General Patton and Mission Command at the Battle of the Bulge
This paper examines General George S. Patton's leadership during the Battle of the Bulge (December 1944–January 1945), with particular focus on the relief of Bastogne from German encirclement. Patton's performance is evaluated through four of the six mission command principles outlined in Army Doctrine Reference Publication 6-0: building cohesive teams through mutual trust, providing a clear commander's intent, exercising disciplined initiative, and accepting prudent risk. Drawing on primary Army doctrine and historical scholarship, the paper argues that Patton's application of these principles was decisive in turning the tide of the battle and preventing a potentially catastrophic German breakthrough in northwest Europe.
- Introduction: Framing Patton's role through mission command
- Overview of the Battle of the Bulge: German offensive origins and strategic stakes
- General Patton's Performance and Role in the Battle's Outcome: Patton's Third Army relieves Bastogne
- Mission Command Principle 1: Build Cohesive Teams Through Mutual Trust: Patton builds trust through shared hardship and leadership changes
- Mission Command Principle 2: Provide a Clear Commander's Intent: Patton communicates purpose through speeches and meetings
- Mission Command Principles 3 and 4: Disciplined Initiative and Prudent Risk: Patton anticipates orders and accepts calculated risk
- Conclusion: Mission command principles decide outcome at Bastogne
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It anchors historical narrative in formal doctrine, systematically applying each mission command principle from ADRP 6-0 to specific battlefield decisions, which prevents the analysis from becoming mere biography.
- Concrete examples — Patton's Christmas message, his pre-planned contingency orders before the Eisenhower meeting, and his 72-hour turnaround to Bastogne — ground each abstract principle in verifiable historical events.
- The strategic stakes (Bastogne as the linchpin of the German offensive) are clearly established early, giving the reader context to appreciate why Patton's actions mattered beyond individual heroics.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied framework analysis: rather than narrating events chronologically and editorializing afterward, it structures the analytical sections around a pre-established doctrinal framework (mission command principles), using each principle as a lens through which historical evidence is selected and interpreted. This technique is common in military studies and leadership research and shows how doctrine can serve as an analytical tool rather than just a prescriptive guide.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a strategic framing introduction, follows with a historical overview of the battle's origins and context, then pivots to the analytical core — four numbered subsections, each treating one mission command principle. A brief conclusion synthesizes the argument, connecting Patton's individual actions back to the battle's overall outcome. This clear, modular structure makes the argument easy to follow and the doctrinal application explicit at every stage.
Introduction
Fought between December 16, 1944, and January 25, 1945, the Battle of the Bulge remains one of the most notable engagements of World War II — not only because of the significant death toll on both sides, but also because of the varied tactics and strategies applied by the Allied forces that shaped its ultimate outcome. This paper highlights the role played by General George S. Patton in the Battle of the Bulge — and more specifically in the relief of Bastogne from German encirclement — in what is widely considered one of the battle's most significant turning points. Patton's effectiveness is reviewed in the context of the principles of mission command.
From the outset, it is important to note that without the brilliant operational conduct and gallant efforts of General Patton's Third Army, the Allied forces might well have failed in their efforts to advance in the west. With this in mind, the relief of Bastogne during the Siege of Bastogne remains one of the most defining moments in the greater Battle of the Bulge. The city of Bastogne held great strategic importance for the Germans. It was one of two cities — the other being St. Vith — whose capture would have cleared a path for the Germans to reach Antwerp and effectively divide the Allied forces. As will be demonstrated in this paper, General Patton's role in the outcome of the Battle of the Bulge stands as a compelling example of mission command principles in practice.
References
Collins, M. & King, M. (2013). The Tigers of Bastogne: Voices of the 10th Armored Division in the Battle of the Bulge. Oxford: Casemate.
Department of the Army (2012). ADRP 6-0 Mission Command. Washington, DC: Army Doctrine Reference Publication.
Knight, R. L. (2004). The Crimson Flake. Victoria, BC: Trafford Publishing.
Luecke, R. A. (1994). Scuttle Your Ships Before Advancing. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Perrett, G. (1999). Eisenhower. New York, NY: Random House.
Rickard, J. N. (2011). Advance and Destroy: Patton as Commander in the Bulge. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.
U.S. Army (2018). The Battle of the Bulge. Retrieved from
Weintraub, S. (2007). General George S. Patton and the Battle of the Bulge. Retrieved from http://www.historynet.com/battle-of-the-bulge
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.