Reducing Pediatric ED Wait Times Through Discharge Education
This paper presents the findings of a Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) project focused on reducing extended wait times at a pediatric emergency department (PED). The central problem is that inadequate discharge education leads patients to return for complications they could have managed at home, contributing to dissatisfaction and poor organizational outcomes. Drawing on a literature review of U.S.-based primary research published within the past five years — sourced from JAMA Network, Cochrane Open Access, and related databases — the project identifies evidence-based strategies showing that pre-discharge education and post-discharge follow-up phone calls significantly reduce hospital revisits. The paper proposes an enhanced discharge education program as a practical intervention, while acknowledging constraints related to cost, time, and potential staff resistance to change.
- Introduction and Problem Statement: Extended PED wait times driven by poor discharge education
- Significance of Hospital Readmissions: National statistics on readmission rates and costs
- Literature Review Methods: Search strategy and inclusion and exclusion criteria
- Evidence-Based Findings: Pre-discharge education reduces revisits significantly
- Proposed Intervention and Project Goals: Enhanced discharge program with follow-up phone calls
- Challenges and Limitations: Cost, time, and staff resistance barriers identified
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds the intervention in a concrete, quantifiable problem — extended PED wait times driven by preventable readmissions — giving the proposal clear clinical relevance.
- Supports the argument with specific national statistics (1 in 5 Medicaid patients, $42 billion in annual readmission costs), lending authority to the urgency of the problem.
- Transparently describes the literature search protocol, including inclusion and exclusion criteria, which strengthens the credibility of the evidence base.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates evidence-to-practice translation — a core DNP competency — by moving systematically from a clinical problem statement, through a structured literature review, to a specific, actionable intervention. This technique shows how nursing research is applied directly to improve patient outcomes and organizational efficiency.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a standard DNP project abstract/proposal structure: problem identification, epidemiological significance, literature review methodology, synthesis of findings, proposed intervention, and acknowledgment of real-world constraints. Each section builds logically on the previous one, making the rationale for the enhanced discharge education program easy to follow. Total length is concise, consistent with an abstract or executive summary format for a practice-change project.
Introduction and Problem Statement
Extended wait times among pediatric patients at a selected Pediatric Emergency Department (PED) represent a significant and ongoing clinical problem. A key driver of these wait times is the failure of nurses and clinicians to effectively educate patients at the point of discharge. When patients do not fully understand their discharge instructions, many return to the emergency department for complications that could have been managed at home. This pattern of avoidable revisits leads to patient dissatisfaction and poor organizational outcomes, including the risk that other patients may leave without receiving care.
Significance of Hospital Readmissions
Hospital readmission within 30 days of discharge remains a serious public health concern in the United States. Statistics indicate that 1 in 5 Medicaid patients returns to the hospital within 30 days of discharge. Cumulatively, hospital readmissions alone account for approximately $42 billion in health spending annually. These figures underscore the urgent need for evidence-based strategies that improve the quality of discharge processes and reduce preventable returns to care.
Literature Review Methods
A literature review was conducted to gather evidence-based knowledge on strategies for enhancing the effectiveness of discharge procedures. Evidence was gathered by searching for U.S.-based primary research articles in the JAMA Network, Cochrane Open Access, the Directory of Open Access Journals, and the Digital Commons Network. Only articles published within the past five years were included. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and older articles were excluded from the primary analysis, though they were retained as reference material and incorporated into the narrative review.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.