Reducing Pediatric ED Wait Times Through Discharge Education
This paper presents a quality improvement project aimed at reducing extended wait times at a Pediatric Emergency Department (PED) caused by high rates of patient revisits following inadequate discharge education. Drawing on evidence from primary research articles, the project proposes an enhanced pre-discharge education program — including patient workbooks and instructional videos — combined with post-discharge follow-up phone calls. The IOWA Model of Evidence-Based Practice guides the intervention from problem identification through implementation and evaluation. Key evidence demonstrates that structured discharge education and follow-up significantly reduce 30-day readmission rates and unplanned revisits. The project targets a 50% reduction in reoccurring visits over six months, with the goal of cutting average wait times to under one hour and improving overall patient satisfaction.
- Background to the Problem: National scope of discharge failures and readmissions
- Problem Statement and Resolution Strategy: PED revisit rates and proposed intervention design
- Literature Review: Evidence from four primary studies on discharge interventions
- Project Evaluation: Impact, efficacy, relevance, and sustainability measures
- The IOWA Model of Evidence-Based Practice: Five-step IOWA framework applied to the project
- Conclusion: Summary of goals and expected patient outcomes
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds its intervention in a clearly defined, data-backed clinical problem — specifically that over 65% of patients were returning to the PED within 14 days of discharge — giving the proposal a strong practical rationale.
- It integrates multiple peer-reviewed studies at different levels of evidence (RCTs, quality improvement longitudinal studies, prospective trials) to triangulate support for its dual pre- and post-discharge strategy.
- The structured use of the IOWA model gives the paper a clear organizational logic, walking from problem identification through evidence selection, application, evaluation, and sustainability.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates evidence synthesis in service of a quality improvement proposal. Rather than simply summarizing literature, it appraises each study's design and findings and maps them directly to specific components of the proposed intervention — for instance, linking Boden-Albala et al. (2018) to the workbook-and-video format, and Fruhan and Bills (2022) to the call-back component. This move-from-evidence-to-design technique is characteristic of graduate-level clinical project work.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an abstract and keyword set, then moves through a background section establishing the national scope of the readmission problem, a focused problem statement tied to the specific PED, a resolution strategy section introducing both the intervention design and the IOWA model, a standalone literature review evaluating four primary studies, a project evaluation section covering impact, efficacy, relevance, and sustainability, and a detailed IOWA model walkthrough before closing with a brief conclusion. References follow APA format throughout.
Background to the Problem
Every year, over 35 million discharges occur across the United States' hospital network (Alper et al., 2022). The process of discharging a patient from a hospital is complicated, as it makes families and patients responsible for coordinating their own care. In an ideal transition of care, the healthcare provider prepares the patient by adequately communicating crucial discharge information on medication, side effects, and when to schedule follow-ups, guided by the patient's health status and health literacy levels (Bajorek & McElroy, 2020). Studies have associated effective discharge education with greater medication compliance and lower readmission and mortality risks (Boden-Albala et al., 2018; deJong et al., 2020). For instance, deJong et al. (2020) found that a quality improvement bundle that included enhanced discharge information and follow-up reduced readmission rates in a pediatric hospital from 10 percent to 7.4 percent over a four-month period.
Unfortunately, healthcare providers may not always be in a position to predict a patient's discharge day, so in most cases discharges are conducted in an unstandardized and rushed manner on the day of discharge (Bajorek & McElroy, 2020). Patients mostly receive a large volume of new information explained hurriedly, with little consideration for their health status or health literacy levels (Boden-Albala et al., 2018). In most cases, healthcare providers use health-related jargon to explain medication side effects and indications, which patients may not understand or may find difficult to remember (Boden-Albala et al., 2018). Emergency Department (ED) patients and caregivers typically receive discharge information across four domains: ED-based care, diagnosis and cause, instructions on when to return, and post-ED care (Boden-Albala et al., 2018). In one study, researchers interviewed 140 English-speaking caretakers and patients upon release from the ED to assess how well they understood the discharge instructions they had received (Boden-Albala et al., 2018). The study found that fewer than 15 percent of respondents had understood all four domains of ED discharge instructions (Boden-Albala et al., 2018).
Poor understanding of discharge instructions is associated with unintended hospital revisits, a greater risk of readmission, and decreased patient satisfaction (Boden-Albala et al., 2018). Statistics indicate that 1 in 5 Medicaid patients in the US returns to hospital within 30 days of discharge. Cumulatively, readmissions alone account for approximately $42 billion in health spending annually.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.