This paper is a critical reaction to a peer's post on plagiarism in academic and professional contexts. The reviewer evaluates the peer's definition of plagiarism, use of Turnitin software, and OSCOLA citation practices, while identifying key weaknesses: an uncited political example involving German politicians, a conceptual confusion between confidentiality agreements and plagiarism prevention, and a lack of concrete real-world examples such as copyright or patent infringement. The review concludes with constructive recommendations for strengthening the post's arguments and improving its conclusion.
In the post regarding plagiarism, my peer provides insight into the dangers of plagiarism within academic and professional settings. The peer successfully explains what plagiarism is, how it can be avoided, and the repercussions thereof. However, upon closer examination of the post, there are several issues that need to be addressed in order to make the arguments stronger and more comprehensible.
In the post, plagiarism is clearly defined and an explanation is given as to why it is important to cite resources. Additionally, it is argued that failure to cite and reference sources can lead to dissertation failure. The author also provides a solution to ensure against plagiarism beyond proper citations: comparing any work a student writes with previously published materials by running the paper through Turnitin, a plagiarism-detecting software platform.
The author argues that he or she plans to use the Oxford Standard for Citation of Legal Authorities (OSCOLA) in order to avoid plagiarism in his or her own academic work. The author admits understanding the importance of citation and believes that previous experience with the Harvard method of citation will help in adapting to the new citation style.
The author's definition of plagiarism, the explanation of how Turnitin can help prevent plagiarism, and the explanation of how OSCOLA referencing will be used are all sufficiently explained. These sections represent the strongest portions of the post and demonstrate a solid foundational understanding of academic citation practices.
While the author successfully explains why plagiarism must be avoided in academic writing, the attempt to explain the detrimental effects of plagiarism in the political world falls short and raises important questions: How is plagiarism defined in the political sphere? What are the consequences for specific types of plagiarism?
In the post, the author comments that in Germany there was recently a scandal in which high-ranking politicians were charged with plagiarism and lost their jobs, but does not explain the type of plagiarism that occurred. This omission makes the claim sound less credible. Paradoxically, the post fails to provide a citation or reference for this claim, despite commenting on the importance of citations to avoid plagiarism. Providing a more detailed explanation of the plagiarism that occurred would allow the reader to understand how plagiarism presents itself in the political world and would also demonstrate how citations are utilized across all aspects of writing.
"Misunderstanding of confidentiality agreements critiqued"
"Suggestions for stronger arguments and conclusion"
You’re 63% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.