This paper examines two organizations dedicated to protecting water quality in the Perkiomen Creek region of southeastern Pennsylvania: the Perkiomen Watershed Conservancy and the Upper Perkiomen Watershed Coalition. It explains what a watershed is, describes the geographic and hydrological features of the Upper Perkiomen Watershed, and discusses how human interventions such as damming have altered the region's natural dynamics. The paper surveys the major categories of water pollution threatening the watershed and outlines the conservation philosophy shared by both groups, emphasizing the importance of land-use planning, open-space preservation, and integrated regional cooperation to safeguard water resources for both human and non-human inhabitants.
Although water is among the most precious resources available to us, we spend very little time thinking about where the water in our community comes from, what organisms other than ourselves it serves, and what is being done to protect its quality — both for humans and for other organisms dependent upon the local watershed. This paper examines two groups that are in fact looking out for local water quality: conservation organizations that advocate the protection of the environment for all who use it, basing their beliefs and recommendations on both a committed philosophy and careful scientific analysis.
The first of these two groups is the Perkiomen Watershed Conservancy, a nonprofit organization founded in 1964 by local citizens to combat pollution in the Perkiomen Creek and its tributaries. The conservancy is headed by a 14-member board of directors along with an advisory board of seven people and a staff of seven. It has over 500 individual and family members as well as 33 municipal members, and it comprises a number of distinct programs, including educational programs, conservation programs, and land stewardship and protection programs. Like most other conservation groups of its type, the organization depends upon both individual and corporate and foundation support, and has received funding from over 30 companies and foundations since it was founded.
Before continuing, it is worth clarifying what exactly a watershed is. While the term may be unfamiliar to many people, the concept itself is fairly simple — even those who do not know the terminology are probably already aware of the phenomenon. A watershed is simply a defined geographic area into which all precipitation (in this case both rain and snow) flows into a single stream or connected system of streams.
The term "drainage basin" is sometimes used instead of watershed, but "watershed" is perhaps the preferred term. "Drainage basin" carries a suggestion of sewage or at least of human intervention and engineered works, while "watershed" more naturally implies that the phenomenon is a natural one, shaped by geological substrates and the natural contours of the land in question.
The Upper Perkiomen Watershed covers 144 square miles of land within the counties of Montgomery, Berks, Lehigh, and Bucks — an area that includes 18 townships and six boroughs. Its major tributaries include the West Branch of the Perkiomen (also known as Northwest Branch), Indian Creek, Hosensack Creek, Macoby Creek, Unami Creek, Ridge Valley Creek, and Deep Creek.
The waters of the Upper Perkiomen Watershed and all tributaries except the Unami and Deep Creek drain into Green Lane Reservoir, an artificial impoundment owned by the Philadelphia Suburban Water Company (PSWC). The watershed is also currently defined by two other dams: downstream of the reservoir is a dam that creates the 25-acre Knights Lake, and adjoining Knights Lake is a 38-acre body of water called Deep Creek Lake, also formed by a dam. Both Unami Creek and Deep Creek drain into the Perkiomen Creek at a point downstream of the Green Lane Reservoir.
"Examines how dams altered the watershed's natural state"
"Surveys land cover, development pressures, and conservation planning"
"Lists eight major categories of water pollution"
For the good of everything that lives in this region, we must hope that the conservancy, along with other conservation groups, succeeds in its mission.
You’re 48% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.