This paper examines the role of personality in organizational behavior, covering dispositional, situational, and interactionist approaches to understanding workplace conduct. It discusses key personality variables — including locus of control, self-monitoring, self-esteem, proactive personality, and general self-efficacy — and explains how each influences job performance, satisfaction, and leadership. The paper also addresses cross-cultural variation in values using Hofstede's five cultural dimensions and concludes by reflecting on how personality, perception, and motivation interact to shape individual behavior within organizations.
This study guide is drawn from PaperDue's library of 130,000+ paper examples across 47 subjects.
Personality refers to the psychological characteristics that influence the way people react to other individuals, situations, and problems in their environment. Personality influences an organization most strongly in "weak" situations — those where roles and rules are unclear. In "strong" situations where roles and rules are more strictly defined, personality has less of an impact on behavior.
According to the dispositional approach, people's internal characteristics influence their attitudes and behaviors. The situational approach, by contrast, holds that the traits of the organization itself shape people's attitudes and behavior. The interactionist approach combines the two, arguing that organizational behavior results from the interaction between individual dispositions and situational factors.
People with an external locus of control see their lives as governed by fate, luck, and more powerful others. "Internals," by contrast, believe their lives are products of self-initiative, personal actions, and free will. People with an internal locus of control tend to feel better about their jobs, earn higher incomes, rise to higher positions in organizational hierarchies, perceive less stress, and plan their careers more carefully — because they feel these outcomes are within their power to influence.
People low in self-monitoring act according to how they feel and say what they think with little regard for the situation. People high in self-monitoring show concern for socially appropriate behavior, and this attentiveness generally helps them emerge as leaders.
People with low self-esteem are more vulnerable to external influences, react poorly to negative feedback, and struggle with ambiguous or stressful situations. Organizations benefit from a workforce with high self-esteem because these individuals tend to make more satisfying career decisions, experience greater fulfillment in their work, and are generally more resilient.
Positive affectivity describes the tendency to view situations in a positive light; negative affectivity is the opposite. The core implication is straightforward: people with positive affectivity tend to like their jobs, while those with negative affectivity are more frequently stressed.
A proactive personality means one actively works to shape one's environment. This trait is directly correlated with job performance, stress tolerance, effective leadership, initiative, teamwork, entrepreneurship, and career success.
General self-efficacy (GSE) refers to a person's belief in their ability to perform successfully across a wide variety of situations. People with high GSE adapt well and tend to show higher job satisfaction and job performance.
Self-esteem, GSE, locus of control, and neuroticism together form a person's core self-evaluations — a broad personality concept that reflects the overall assessments people make of themselves and their self-worth. Like the individual traits that comprise it, core self-evaluations are positively related to job satisfaction, job performance, and life satisfaction overall.
"Hofstede's dimensions and global management implications"
"Connecting traits, perception, and motivational design"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.