Philadelphia International Airport Expansion Plan: Pros and Cons
This paper examines the proposed $5.2 billion expansion of Philadelphia International Airport, which received preliminary FAA approval amid significant controversy. The paper traces the airport's history and the congestion problems driving the expansion, then evaluates three major areas of concern: potential damage to the Delaware River ecosystem and local wildlife, the displacement of approximately 72 homes and 80 businesses in South Philadelphia and Tinicum Township, and the financial tradeoffs involved. While the plan promises 15,600 new jobs and improved regional transportation capacity, critics argue it threatens constitutional property rights, reduces local tax revenues, and causes lasting environmental harm. The paper concludes that the city and FAA have weighed these competing interests in favor of long-term regional economic benefit.
- Introduction: National congestion crisis and Philadelphia expansion overview
- The Reasons for the Project: Airport history and infrastructure limitations driving expansion
- Possible Effects on the Ecosystem: Air, land, and river environmental damage from construction
- The Communities Around Philadelphia International: Displacement of homes, businesses, and resident opposition
- The Financial Impact of the Plan: Property value losses weighed against job creation gains
- Conclusion: FAA and city favor long-term regional economic benefit
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper clearly frames a policy debate by presenting multiple stakeholder perspectives — residents, city planners, and environmental advocates — supported by direct quotations and specific data points.
- Concrete figures (e.g., 15,600 jobs created, $216,000 decline in property values, 24.5 acres of river fill) ground abstract tradeoff arguments in measurable terms.
- The organizational structure mirrors a cost-benefit analysis, making it easy for readers to follow the competing claims before a final assessment is offered.
Key academic technique demonstrated
This paper demonstrates the use of multi-source synthesis to build a balanced argument. Rather than relying on a single viewpoint, the author draws on FAA reports, local journalism, community testimony, and planning documents to construct a layered picture of a contested infrastructure project. This technique shows how academic writing can incorporate primary voices (resident and planner quotes) alongside statistical evidence without privileging one over the other.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with national airport congestion context before narrowing to Philadelphia International. Four body sections address the historical rationale, environmental consequences, community impact, and financial implications of the expansion plan in sequence. A brief conclusion synthesizes the benefits and drawbacks identified across those sections. The structure is broadly thematic rather than argumentative, reflecting an undergraduate policy-analysis approach.
Introduction
Over the last several years, a variety of U.S. airports have been experiencing tremendous amounts of congestion. Part of the reason for this is that many facilities are built in areas that have seen rapid increases in the number of surrounding homes and businesses. At the same time, total passenger and cargo traffic has risen exponentially. Over time, this has caused the number of safety incidents to increase dramatically. Evidence of this can be seen in a study conducted by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), which found that between 1995 and 2006, the total number of runway mishaps rose by 37%. This is because many airports are often congested and unable to handle the volume of traffic, meaning that the chances of a particular facility experiencing some kind of incident increase significantly (Tategate, 2007).
As a result, the FAA has been aggressively focused on reducing congestion, spending $1 billion per year modernizing the nation's air traffic control system. Other areas, however, were neglected due to funding issues. A few of the most notable include runways, terminals, ground and baggage transportation, and parking. The agency claims it needs an additional $510 million to finish upgrading 38 major airports around the country. This is significant because it illustrates how a number of facilities across the United States are facing infrastructure-related challenges ("FAA Approves Philadelphia Airport Expansion Plan," 2011).
In the case of Philadelphia International Airport, the facility has been dealing with similar issues. It is known for having the second worst record for delays in the country, while total traffic accounts for 472,688 takeoffs and approximately 30 million passengers annually. By 2030, these numbers are expected to rise, with the airport estimated to welcome 60 million visitors. During that period, many of the existing facilities will face increased strain. Key proposed improvements include lengthening two runways, building a fifth runway along the Delaware River, constructing a new commuter terminal, adding more gates, expanding parking, and building a new ground transportation system. To accomplish this, the airport received preliminary approval for a $5.2 billion plan from the FAA. However, many communities surrounding the facility have opposed these plans, with residents fearful about the impact on the community and the environment. Examining this issue fully requires consideration of the underlying reasons for the project, possible effects on the ecosystem, and how the expansion is affecting communities around Philadelphia International ("FAA Approves Philadelphia Airport Expansion Plan," 2011).
The Reasons for the Project
The site for Philadelphia International Airport was first developed in 1925. At the time, it was intended as an ideal location for training aviators and National Guard pilots. However, pressure to attract passenger traffic meant the facility was made available to commercial airlines by 1926, with Eastern Airlines using it as a hub. This helped develop the facility as other airlines began offering service to the region. A major issue for the site, however, was that South Philadelphia began to rapidly expand toward the perimeter. Over time, the lack of available land limited the airport's size to the acreage owned by the city ("History of Philadelphia International," 2011).
Throughout the decades, major improvements were made to the site. The most notable include the expansion of the main terminal several times, the addition of runways and cargo terminals, and the introduction of a rail line directly linking Philadelphia International with the rest of the city. These improvements provided a basic foundation for the airport to meet the needs of businesses and the general public throughout the region, and helped establish the airport as a hub that provided a major economic boost to Philadelphia ("History of Philadelphia International," 2011).
Despite these improvements, the space available for expansion became increasingly limited. The city had built up around the facility, and there was no room to grow eastward due to the Delaware River. These factors meant that improvements were incremental rather than comprehensive, failing to address traffic congestion or the need for runway and terminal space. To keep up with growing demand, the city proposed dramatically expanding the perimeter of the facility. This will require tearing down approximately 70 homes to achieve the proposed changes — a prospect that has intensified emotions on both sides of the debate ("History of Philadelphia International," 2011).
Possible Effects on the Ecosystem
The new project will have possible effects on the ecosystem through impacts on air quality, land, and the river. Encouraging a larger number of flights in and out of the area will cause pollution levels in South Philadelphia to increase. Noise levels will also rise from the greater number of aircraft taking off and landing. As far as land is concerned, the proposed changes will require redoing the infrastructure around the facility, generating greater amounts of dust and particulate matter during the redesign process. The expansion of runways along the Delaware River means increased pollutants will enter the water, as the plan calls for filling in 24.5 acres of the river to make room for the new runway. Chemicals and building materials entering the river during construction will affect fish populations, and aircraft exhaust gases released above the water during takeoff and landing could, over time, also affect the migration patterns of birds in the vicinity of the airport (Luce, 2011).
These concerns explain why many environmental groups are opposed to the plan. They believe the combined effects will lead to greater environmental damage to the area, with construction having a short- to medium-term negative impact on fish species in the river as the process involves excavating the earth and moving large amounts of debris (Luce, 2011).
When construction is complete, the number of planes taking off and landing will continue to affect the nesting and migration patterns of birds, because the new runway along the river will destroy habitat. The new facility and expanded rail connections will also generate greater amounts of trash and waste that must be disposed of. These elements collectively highlight how the current plan has the potential to cause considerable damage to the ecology surrounding the facility (Luce, 2011).
Conclusion
The current expansion of Philadelphia International Airport presents a number of clear benefits and drawbacks. The advantages include an increase of 15,600 jobs over 12 years and the assurance that the facility can keep pace with growing demand, providing the region with a viable and modern transportation center. However, the process will bring several negative consequences: a reduction in property values, the loss of tax revenues for select communities, the elimination of 3,500 jobs, and damage to the surrounding environment. On balance, the FAA and the City of Philadelphia have concluded that the expansion of the airport will provide the greatest long-term benefits for the region as a whole. Whether the affected communities ultimately accept that conclusion — or successfully challenge it in the courts — remains to be seen.
Bibliography
FAA Approves Philadelphia Airport Expansion Plan. (2011). Philly.com. Retrieved from: http://articles.philly.com/2011-01-05/news/27010909_1_city-owned-airport-busiest-airlines-runways
History of Philadelphia International. (2011). PHL. Retrieved from:
Harvey, A. (2011). South Philadelphia. Philadelphia Neighborhoods. Retrieved from: http://sct.temple.edu/blogs/murl/2011/06/25/southwest-philadelphia-airport-expansion-may-mean-losing-homes/
Klein, Z. (2011). Philadelphia Airport Plans. Construction Law Signal. Retrieved from:
Luce, P. (2011). New FAA Report. Delco Times. Retrieved from:
Tategate, M. (2007). Forbes. Retrieved from: http://www.forbes.com/2007/02/22/airports-americas-deadliest-biz-cz_mt_0223airports.html
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.