This paper examines three critical challenges facing contemporary police administrators: the balance between no-tolerance and community policing philosophies, the integration of evolving technology into law enforcement operations, and the management of cultural diversity within police departments. The analysis demonstrates that effective police administration requires flexibility in choosing operational methodologies based on local conditions, careful oversight of technological tools to ensure legal compliance, and comprehensive training to address the needs of increasingly diverse communities.
Operational methodology in modern police administration ranges from the no-tolerance approach at one end of the spectrum to the community policing approach at the other. Instituting the right operational methodology requires the flexibility to adapt to the local environment and the procedural mechanisms to evaluate successes and failures. Both systems have their advantages where conditions are conducive to their methods; neither works particularly well when it reflects only administrative decisions without careful consideration of the operational environment (Nolan et al., 2005).
Generally, the no-tolerance approach is a function of the so-called "broken windows" theory, according to which seemingly minor issues such as low-level violations and the cosmetic deterioration of physical property correspond to increased crimes of a more serious nature (Ellison, 2006). The idea of no tolerance means mandatory enforcement of quality-of-life violations such as loitering, leash law infractions, drinking alcohol in public view, and noisy radios as a means of deterring more serious crime. In theory, enforcing minor violations through active police presence and maintaining the physical integrity of property and infrastructure reduce more serious crime through deterrence and by the suggested inference of municipal attention to even the smallest details (Ellison, 2006).
Whereas no-tolerance policing works best in certain types of high-crime areas, situational policing studies indicate that lower-crime neighborhoods—particularly those in middle-class communities with high levels of community involvement and positive relations between the community and local police agencies—benefit much more from community policing strategies (Ellison, 2006). Community policing focuses less on code enforcement and more on establishing cooperative mechanisms between the police and the community that enable community organizations to augment police efforts to address crime and maintain public safety (Duff, 2006).
Like other elements of modern society, police administration has been changed significantly by the continued development of technological progress. The first generations of police officers patrolled their sectors on foot without the benefit of radio contact with fellow officers. Even after radio motor patrol (RMP) vehicles became widely available by the middle of the 20th century, subsequent generations of police officers and criminal investigators had few technological or forensic tools such as internet access to nationwide criminal information databases, computerized fingerprint recognition systems, and DNA analysis—tools that are now considered standard equipment even in small police agencies.
In addition to tactical police equipment and investigative tools employed by officers in the field, modern technology also imposes administrative changes to comply with evolving laws that govern the proper procedures for collecting evidence from electronic information sources (Bulzomi, 2007). For example, the information storage capacity of cellular telephones, pagers, and PDAs has generated Fourth Amendment search and seizure issues that have had to be addressed by the U.S. Supreme Court (Bulzomi, 2007). Likewise, modern global positioning system (GPS) technology allows police to monitor the whereabouts of criminal suspects, but it has required changes to federal law to distinguish the applicability of Fourth Amendment rights to the information from their applicability to privacy rights with respect to accessing specific physical property to accomplish equipment installation (Hodges, 2007).
Finally, technological progress has provided law enforcement agents with many tools for evidence collection and analysis, which also requires administrative procedures and training to ensure that the use of new technologies is consistent with established protocols for complying with traditional concepts. For example, digital photography has become ubiquitous by virtue of the ability of many cellular telephones to take photographs. However, because digital data is more susceptible to manipulation after the fact, police administrators must incorporate specific training to guard against the exclusion of valuable evidence by establishing and enforcing chain-of-custody procedures with respect to the original recording of digital photographic evidence (Nagosky, 2005).
"Cultural competency and diversity training requirements"
You’re 81% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.