Pop Culture Websites: Hunger Games vs. James Bond
This paper compares the official promotional websites for The Hunger Games and the James Bond franchise (007.com) through the lens of academic theories on celebrity culture and new media. Drawing on Michael Serazio's concept of "premediation" and Marwick and Boyd's analysis of celebrity practice in mass media, the paper examines each site's visual design, content depth, interactivity, and target audience. It argues that while both sites exemplify the premediated, buzz-driven logic of contemporary film marketing, the 007 site reflects a more established, adult-oriented franchise culture, whereas the Hunger Games site functions primarily as a ticket-sales funnel aimed at younger fans.
- Introduction: Premediated Culture and Film Promotion: Serazio's premediation framework applied to film sites
- The Hunger Games Website: Design and Purpose: Hunger Games site layout, content, and ticket focus
- The 007 Website: Interactivity and Franchise Culture: 007 site's richer content and adult audience appeal
- Visual Design and Color Schemes Compared: Color, depth, and scrolling differences between sites
- Celebrity Culture, Triviality, and the Premediated Audience: Both sites as mindless yet premediated entertainment
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds a concrete, specific comparison (two film websites) in well-chosen academic frameworks, giving the analysis scholarly weight without losing accessibility.
- Moves logically from broad theoretical context to granular observations about color schemes, scrolling depth, and link architecture — demonstrating close reading of digital artifacts.
- Consistently returns to Serazio's "premediation" concept to tie observations back to the paper's central argument, creating thematic coherence throughout.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates comparative textual analysis applied to digital media objects. By treating promotional websites as cultural texts, the author shows how marketing surfaces encode assumptions about audience age, franchise history, and consumer behavior — a technique central to media and communication studies.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a theoretical framing paragraph introducing Serazio and Marwick and Boyd, then devotes one paragraph each to describing the two websites, follows with a comparative paragraph on visual design, and closes with a synthesis paragraph that reconnects both sites to the "premediation" thesis. References appear at the end in APA format.
As Michael Serazio (2012) points out, thanks to the Internet, we now live in a "premediated" world — one in which press releases prepare the public to stay tuned for further press releases, as an all-out ad campaign unfolds to promote the latest movie, music release, or television show (p. 416). Everything is prepared ahead of time: the celebrity appearances, the photographers, the clothing the celebrities will wear, and the timing of events so that buzz reaches its greatest height precisely when the product hits the shelves. Two websites created to drum up interest in feature films — the latest installment of The Hunger Games series and the latest installment of the James Bond franchise — illustrate exactly what Serazio describes. This paper compares and contrasts the two sites and shows how, from an academic perspective, they illustrate just how "premeditated" and "premediated" (Serazio, 2010, p. 416) both the films and the public have become.
On the Hunger Games website, a giant image of Katniss Everdeen (played by Jennifer Lawrence) appears at the top of the page. She is wearing a body-hugging superhero suit and aiming a bow and arrow at a target off-screen, with fire flaming across the page behind her. The image is on a rotator and is soon replaced by a link to the Hunger Games VR Experience, which is then replaced by a link to cast interviews, and so on. Clicking on the page takes the visitor to a separate page where tickets to the film can be purchased — and that appears to be the site's main objective. A link to the trailer is available when scrolling down the page, along with another link to buy tickets and a link to the official Hunger Games store.
On the 007 website, Daniel Craig is shown in a tuxedo, posing with his arm around a female cast member in a white gown at the film's debut in China. Clicking this link takes the visitor to a news story about "Bond 24" opening in Beijing. Like the Hunger Games site, this link sits on a rotator. The page is far fuller, however, offering picture links to various news articles: one about director Sam Mendes receiving a Britannia Award, one about Daniel Craig performing in Othello, one about the James Bond cars, an interview with the special effects director, and much more.
The site is considerably more interactive and geared toward older audiences than the Hunger Games site. It boasts an array of celebrity photos, interviews, articles, and additional content — representing what Marwick and Boyd (2011) call the "increasingly significant part of mass media": the glamorous photos, the all-access links, the behind-the-scenes details, and the "trivial, dangerous decadence of American culture" (p. 141). While the Hunger Games site represents an equal triviality, its website is less glamorous, less robust, and less rich in information. It presents a few links to photos and articles, but it is mainly a way for fans of the series to connect to the film's fan page, follow along on social media, or purchase tickets.
The 007 site is more interactive because it carries the weight of a significantly longer franchise history and a much wider, more adult fan base. It offers far more than a few links and social media follow buttons (Facebook, Twitter); it also delivers the latest news regarding the current Bond film. It is a much more established site overall. The Hunger Games site looks as though it will be removed once the film has completed its theatrical run. 007.com, however, is more than likely here to stay.
The color scheme of The Hunger Games website is not especially striking: a basic black background with little visual depth to the page. The color scheme of 007 is more refined — the page sits on a classic white background and avoids clutter by keeping tabs to a minimum. One can scroll at considerable length down the 007 page, whereas the Hunger Games site requires almost no scrolling at all.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.