Portman Hotel Company PV System: Diagnosis & Action Plan
This paper examines the Portman Hotel Company's personal valet (PV) system, a distinctive service model designed to differentiate the hotel in the luxury market by consolidating all guest-service duties into a single role. The paper diagnoses the system's core problems—including interpersonal conflict among staff, low motivation, and structural design flaws—through organizational behavior theories such as fundamental attribution error and expectancy theory. It evaluates why the 5-star corrective plan fell short, and proposes concrete action steps including a team captain role, monthly performance awards, and team-building retreats to restore morale, improve service quality, and align organizational structure with the hotel's ambitious service goals.
- The Portman Hotel and the PV System's Business Goals: PV system goals and competitive service vision
- Original Design of the PV System: How PVs were structured and what they did
- Problems with the PV System: Design, Not Implementation: Attribution error, motivation gaps, and job-design flaws
- Failure of the 5-Star Corrective Plan: Why the 5-star plan worsened existing problems
- Recommended Action Plan: Team captain role, awards, and team-building proposals
- Conclusion: Design failure and employee satisfaction lessons
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds its diagnosis in named organizational behavior theories—fundamental attribution error and expectancy theory—lending academic credibility to what could otherwise be purely descriptive case analysis.
- It clearly distinguishes between design failure and implementation failure, a precise analytical move that sharpens the diagnosis and prevents misattribution of the hotel's problems.
- The action plan is specific and costed: it names a dollar figure for the team captain pay increase and a projected annual budget for team-building retreats, making recommendations feel actionable rather than abstract.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied theory integration—taking established frameworks (Simons's four job-design dimensions; Vroom's expectancy theory) and systematically mapping each dimension onto the specific conditions at the Portman Hotel. This technique shows readers not just what went wrong, but why, using concepts that generalize beyond the single case.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a classic business case structure: context and goals → system design → problem diagnosis → evaluation of an attempted fix → forward-looking recommendations → conclusion. Each section builds logically on the previous one, moving from description to analysis to prescription, which is the expected flow for graduate-level management case studies.
The Portman Hotel and the PV System's Business Goals
The Portman Hotel Company is recognized as one of the most prestigious and luxurious hotels in its market. Its personal valet (PV) system was designed to elevate service levels for guests well beyond what competitors offered. The primary business objective of the PV system was to deliver exceptional, personalized service, as PVs were specially trained to understand the personality-based needs of each guest. The system was intended to transform the hotel's organizational structure, making it more effective and distinctive compared to its competitors.
Conventional luxury hotels in America traditionally assigned different personnel to different duties — cleaning rooms, restocking minibars, cleaning hallways, and so on. The PV system sought to consolidate all of these services into a single role. At the Portman Hotel, personal valets performed the full range of duties, from cleaning bathrooms to attending to the needs of high-profile guests.
Original Design of the PV System
In its operational structure, PVs reported to the director of guest room services through five supervisors, one drawn from each team. The director was responsible for preparing staff for guest arrivals, monitoring and approving PV schedules, overseeing payment and compensation, and responding to guest concerns. Each PV's duties included greeting guests at check-in, escorting them to their rooms, and explaining how the hotel operated. PVs were also expected to remain available on call for the entire duration of a guest's stay.
Many of the tasks performed by PVs were comparable to those of a personal butler. These included ironing a guest's shirt before a morning meeting, preparing drinks, drawing baths, cleaning rooms, performing minor maintenance, cleaning hallways, and restocking minibars in each room (Heckscher, 1989).
References
Catrett, J., & Lynn, M. (1999). Managing status in the hotel industry: How Four Seasons came to the fore. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 40(1), 26–39.
Chiang, C. F., Jang, S., Canter, D., & Prince, B. (2008). An expectancy theory model for hotel employee motivation: Examining the moderating role of communication satisfaction. International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration, 9(4), 327–351.
DeLamater, J. (2006). Handbook of Social Psychology. New York: Springer.
Gallardo, E., Sanchez-Canizares, S. M., Lopez-Guzman, T., & Margarida Nascimento Jesus, M. (2010). Employee satisfaction in the Iberian hotel industry: The case of Andalusia (Spain) and the Algarve (Portugal). International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 22(3), 321–334.
Heckscher, C. (1989). The Portman Hotel Company. Harvard Business School.
Pfeffer, J. (1994). Competitive advantage through people: Unleashing the power of the work force. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Price, L. (1994). Poor personnel practice in the hotel and catering industry: Does it matter? Human Resource Management Journal, 4(4), 44–62.
Simons, R. (2005). Designing high-performance jobs. Harvard Business Review.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.