This capstone paper examines the nine Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs) of a Master of Arts in Education program and their application to contemporary teaching. The author ranks and analyzes each PLO—from instructional planning and student knowledge to assessment strategies, research skills, content mastery, leadership, communication, technology integration, and collaboration—arguing that modern educators must move beyond traditional approaches to meet the diverse needs of 21st century learners. Through concrete examples and reflection on classroom practice, the paper demonstrates how PLOs provide a framework for creating engaging, equitable, and learner-centered educational environments.
Much has been written and emphasized throughout contemporary education about the importance of relating to the diversity of learning styles and needs represented in a typical 21st century classroom. As the United States continues to see an increase in multi-ethnic, multinational populations, the children of immigrants who bring diverse cultures and ethnicities to American shores are represented in classrooms nationwide. This presents a serious challenge for educators, since the diversity of students reflects a wide range of competencies, skills, and levels of intellectual comprehension.
Within this context of diversity, instructors must embrace a pivotal 21st century learning challenge: meeting the learning needs of students who may fall behind without one-on-one instruction, while simultaneously addressing the learning needs of more advanced students seeking to progress faster. Many students in the classroom are simply struggling to keep up with assignments. To help all students reach their optimum level of academic achievement, the educational system must change, and the philosophy of instruction must evolve in coordination with assessments, technologies, and strategies.
A newer, fresher, more contemporarily relevant set of learning approaches has driven the development of Master of Arts in Education (MAED) program learning outcomes. The program presents nine Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs), several of which have been refined to incorporate assessment strategies and technological tools inspired by the Framework for 21st Century Learning. However, reading and discussing ideas is relatively easy; putting the best ideas into action so that outcomes meaningfully improve the educational system is far more challenging.
Without new, interesting, and progressive strategies that can be brought into a learning environment and fine-tuned for appropriateness, a 21st century instructor risks reverting to old, tired approaches that will not spark student interest or accomplish educational goals with today's diverse population. Instructors who are sincerely concerned with creating lessons that are understood, relevant, and accessible to all learners in the classroom have much to gain through the application of knowledge gained via the PLOs. Understanding and implementing these outcomes provides the framework needed to transform instruction and engage students across all ability levels and backgrounds.
PLO 1 addresses the most fundamental need in contemporary education and should be ranked at the top of the hierarchy of learning outcomes. It revolves around instructional planning that assists the development of learning for all students, regardless of their pace or current skill level. This outcome recognizes that inequities among learners are inevitable, and new approaches are needed in the education system to address them.
Students arrive in college with established identities, and their learning often incorporates a search for new identities. Their social relations interconnect with their psychosocial, cognitive-structural, and academic learning experiences. A social identity that is developed during an educational experience is likely to become part of a student's life well beyond earning a degree. A positive, well-honed social identity can help teachers become more effective educators, and the overall self-concept that educators develop is linked to both academic success and future professional achievement.
Regarding younger students and their developmental issues, PLO 1 emphasizes that children in poor neighborhoods are often short-changed when it comes to teaching quality and resources. Creative strategies must be employed by educators to address these disparities. As critical pedagogy scholar Peter McLaren explains, failing to discuss issues of equality and social justice with students of color and others in marginalized communities actually turns schools into prisons (McLaren, 2005). Students struggling with educational inequities are often aware of their failures; research shows that by the fourth grade, some students believe they have lost the game.
It is crucial that instructors realize that these particular students see little reason to push ahead when they face mountains of seemingly unattainable challenges. The challenge for teachers in under-resourced environments is to diversify their approach and recognize that, in order to educate students sufficiently so they can become energetic, talented members of the workforce, teachers must step away from corporate, capitalist concepts of the past. Rather than managing pre-selected content, educators should create learning opportunities that link students to fascinating, stimulating, and worthwhile exercises that help them build academic success and confidence.
PLO 2 should be ranked second among the outcomes because it asks instructors to personally know each student in the diverse classroom. This outcome requires the instructor to know far more than just the materials to be taught and the style in which they will be presented. PLO 2 strongly suggests that instructors understand each student's abilities and learning styles. Making the classroom relevant to learners of all motivations and skills requires fully engaging students to approach assignments with enthusiasm and care.
Building collaborative relationships with students—and in certain cases with their parents—means being skilled at embracing differentiated instructional approaches. Adjusting assignments so that lessons are relevant to diverse learners is vital. For example, modifying instruction for a student from Eastern Europe with English as a second language, as well as an alert bilingual student born in the United States, requires thoughtful planning and flexibility (Stallons, 2011).
Differentiated instruction means serving students from all walks of life by allowing each to learn at their own speed in their own comfort zone. Some students learn best by reading rather than listening; others prefer visual media; still others benefit from quiet library settings, while some thrive in collaborative group work with peers whose learning styles are similar. Meeting these varied needs transforms the classroom into an inclusive space where all students can succeed.
PLO 5 (learner-centered, not lesson-centered) should be ranked third among the nine outcomes because it offers tremendous value in modern classrooms. In a classroom where differentiated instruction is practiced, it is appropriate to follow state-supported standards while refining them to meet the unique dynamics of your own classroom. The Common Core Standards have been carefully evaluated by prominent educators, and teachers are obliged to follow them while putting their own stamp on implementation.
The standards provide a foundation for differentiated instruction. By presenting fewer topics to students, teachers give them the opportunity to fully grasp the meaning and implications of each lesson. Instead of expecting students to memorize facts until they become disengaged learners, instructors should use Common Core Standards that are learner-centered and aligned with the digital age. These standards offer guidelines in Language Arts, Mathematics, English, and Social Science, challenging creative instructors to distill course content into exercises that help students develop critical thinking skills.
Having a thorough understanding of a subject is far more desirable than retaining scattered pieces of information, which is what happens when educators try to cram too much content into students' heads instead of using differentiated strategies with realistic goals. Using alternative grading systems, such as pass-fail formats, allows instructors to move beyond the standard A-B-C grading scheme and give credit to students who show great effort even if they do not achieve consistent academic excellence. This approach prevents students who struggle from being harmed psychologically by poor grades and improves classroom management (Looney, 2003).
"Research skills and engaging content inspire lifelong learners"
"Teacher leadership, community collaboration, and technology drive systemic change"
You’re 54% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.