Psychological Testing and Personality Assessment Methods
This paper examines psychological testing as a tool for measuring individual personality characteristics. It introduces three widely used personality assessments—the Type A/B test, the DISC model, and the 16 Personality Factor (16PF) questionnaire—describing how each instrument works and what it measures. The paper then explores the nature versus nurture debate as it relates to personality development, reviewing how genetic and environmental influences interact to shape individual traits. Finally, the author applies all three assessments to a personal self-analysis, comparing and contrasting the results and reflecting on which test most accurately captures their personality profile. The 16PF's "Defender" classification is identified as the most comprehensive and insightful of the three.
- Introduction to Psychological Testing: Defines psychological testing and personality assessment
- Common Personality Tests: Describes Type A/B, DISC, and 16PF instruments
- Nature vs. Nurture in Personality Development: Examines genetic vs. environmental personality influences
- Self-Analysis: Personal Test Results: Author applies and reflects on all three test results
- Conclusion: Synthesizes and ranks test findings by accuracy
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper moves logically from conceptual grounding (defining psychological testing) through instrument descriptions and theory to personal application, giving the argument a clear progressive structure.
- The self-analysis section adds authentic voice and critical reflection, comparing contradictory results across three tests rather than simply accepting each at face value.
- The conclusion synthesizes findings by weighing the tests against one another, demonstrating evaluative thinking rather than mere description.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates comparative analysis across multiple assessment instruments. By juxtaposing the Type A/B, DISC, and 16PF results in the conclusion, the author identifies where findings converge and conflict, then justifies a reasoned preference—a technique that shows critical engagement with sources rather than uncritical reporting.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a definition of psychological testing and personality assessment. It then surveys three personality instruments in numbered sequence, each with its theoretical basis and practical application. A standalone section addresses the nature vs. nurture debate as context for understanding personality formation. The self-analysis section applies all three tests personally, and the conclusion reconciles the results and explains the author's evaluative preference for the 16PF.
Introduction to Psychological Testing
Psychological tests are commonly used to establish individual capabilities and characteristics. Such inferences are derived from collecting, integrating, and interpreting information about a person (Groth-Marnat, 2009). Psychological testing constitutes measuring variables through the use of procedures and devices crafted to demonstrate a person's behavior (Cohen & Swerdlik, 2009). Assessment of personality is, ideally, the measuring and evaluating of psychological aspects such as one's values, states, world view, personal identity, acculturation, behavioral styles, sense of humor, and the related characteristics of an individual (Cohen & Swerdlik, 2009).
Personality tests are designed to determine the character or disposition of a human being. The initial personality tests were designed to examine and predict disorders of a clinical nature. These tests remain useful today and are applied to determine cases in need of counseling. The latest personality tests are used to measure normal characteristics (Miller, McIntire, & Lovler, 2011).
Common Personality Tests
1. Type A or Type B
In the 1950s, Dr. Meyer Friedman and Ray Rosenman developed this personality test to determine whether one has a Type A or Type B personality. In their analysis, they observed that some people—Type A individuals—were more likely to develop cardiac complications owing to their lifestyle, which subjected them to greater stress than others (Friedman, 1996). The test is made up of 10 sentence pairs. Respondents are required to choose from each pair the sentence that most describes them. The test lasts between 2 and 3 minutes and seeks to establish whether one exhibits the typical behavior associated with the Type A personality category.
These characteristics include hostility, difficulty expressing emotions, impatience, perfectionism, and an unreasonable dependence on external motivators such as wealth, power, and money. The outcome of the Type A test is aimed at disclosing whether one is more of a rushed and persistently stressed Type A candidate or a more relaxed Type B individual. The information provides clues as to the likelihood of one developing cardiac problems and other health issues connected to Type A personality behavior.
2. The DISC Personality Test
The outcomes from the DISC personality model are anchored in Marston's model of human behavior. According to Marston, people are driven by four intrinsic factors that determine human behavior. He applied four descriptive traits of behavior patterns, typically represented by the letters D, I, S, and C. The DISC model of behavior determination is founded on normal behavior patterns and is a model for wellness. It is known for its objectivity and descriptive nature, as opposed to being judgmental and subjective.
DISC is universally applicable. It gauges patterns of individuals' observable behavior and measures the intensity of traits by applying open and direct scales for each of the four aspects: dominance, influence, steadiness, and conscientiousness. The DISC model is easy to use and can help people determine their own style while recognizing and adapting to several other styles. It is a useful aid in teaching effective communication with those around them (Rohm, 2013).
3. The 16 Personality Factor (16PF) Test
The 16PF questionnaire is designed to measure personality within the normal range and is believed to be functionally useful in a variety of settings that require a deeper and holistic assessment of a person. The 16PF is the product of many years of factor analytic research aimed at uncovering the primary structures of human personality. Apart from the 16 primary personality traits, the researchers identified five broad aspects that are a variant of the so-called "Big Five Factors." These five factors define personality at a higher level of theory. The basic and global levels of the 16PF characteristics work in conjunction to provide a deeper understanding of one's personality (Cattell & Mead, 2008).
Nature vs. Nurture in Personality Development
The nature–nurture controversy has long been at the center of psychological study of personality development. The controversy is based on arguments about whether a person's inborn (genetic) characteristics are entirely responsible for their personality and character traits, or whether such manifestations are determined by the surroundings in which they are born, develop, establish relationships, and live. The early debate centered on whether one of these aspects outweighed the other. Most psychologists, both historically and today, agree that both influences work together to produce an individual's unique personality. An emphasis on the exclusive role of nature in personality development was considered a dangerous stance for both individuals and society in general (Levitt, 2013).
Personality is shaped by several factors. Some of the most prominent include one's family background, heredity, culture, life experiences, and social relationships. Some aspects of personality can be directly linked to heredity—characteristics such as patience and certain health traits can be connected to one's genetic inheritance. Learning how to handle others and their reactions also comes to form part of people's personality. It is commonly agreed among experts that the two primary influences on personality do not operate independently. Nature and nurture are now understood to interact in complex ways to produce the unique characteristics observed in individuals. Consequently, most modern research in personality development is aimed at establishing how nature and nurture interact to generate different personality traits (McLeod, 2007).
Conclusion
The three tests together paint a picture of who I am. The 16 Personality Test impresses me most, as it details the finer aspects of my being. In particular, the Defender personality identified by the 16PF is impressively insightful. Although I possess an emotional trait, I am also analytical, while simultaneously being an introvert. My social relationships are healthy, and I receive change quite positively—even though I may initially appear resistant. Perfectionism is a common tendency among people with my personality characteristics. Although this can sometimes mean procrastinating, such people can generally be relied on to complete the job in good time.
My personality type means that I tend to want to deliver beyond what is expected in order to impress others. This observation aligns with the Type A personality outcome, which proposes that my personality is ambitious and competitive and that I am impatient. The DISC personality test, however, counters such a view by pointing out that I am slow, systematic, and steady. Because the two tests outline outcomes connected to select aspects of personality and arrive at contradictory conclusions, I am more persuaded by the 16 Personality Test as the most comprehensive and accurate reflection of my character.
References
Cattell, H. E., & Mead, A. D. (2008). The sixteen-personality factor questionnaire (16PF). The SAGE Handbook of Personality Theory and Assessment, 2, 135–178.
Cohen, R., & Swerdlik, M. (2009). Psychological testing and assessment (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Friedman, M. (1996). Type A behavior: Its diagnosis and treatment. Plenum Press (Kluwer Academic Press).
Groth-Marnat, G. (2009). Handbook of psychological assessment. John Wiley & Sons.
Levitt, M. (2013). Perceptions of nature, nurture and behavior. Life Sciences, Society and Policy, 9(1), 13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2195-7819-9-13
McLeod, S. (2008). Type A personality. SimplyPsychology.org. Retrieved February 27, 2017, from http://www.simplypsychology.org/personality-a.html
Miller, L. A., McIntire, S. A., & Lovler, R. L. (2011). Foundations of psychological testing: A practical approach. Sage.
Rohm, R. (2013). A powerful way to understand people using the DISC concept. Discovery Report. Retrieved February 27, 2017, from http://www.discoveryreport.com/downloads/understanding-people-disc-personality-traits.pdf
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.