This paper examines the purpose and significance of groups within social work practice, drawing primarily on Davies (1975). It argues that social workers must engage with groups — not just individuals — in order to achieve their professional goals. The paper explores how adopting a group's worldview serves as a strategic tool rather than a replacement of the social worker's own perspective. It also addresses how repeated engagement with groups builds methodological expertise and ethical competence. Finally, it considers how working with groups helps social workers identify shifting definitions of normality across different social contexts, contributing to both professional and personal development.
The nature and dynamics governing groups in the social environment are critical to understanding social work practice, as this discipline depends on a multitude of social factors — groups being one of the most significant. It is imperative, then, that in order to understand how social work practice can be implemented in specific contexts, social workers must not only work with individuals but also with groups.
This rationale for studying groups in social work practice brings into focus the purpose — or purposes — for which groups are a critical element of the field. Davies (1975) provided a clear explication of this purpose:
"…purposes and ethics which are accepted as proper for casework will normally continue to apply when the social worker begins to act as a group worker… what the social worker regards as desirable and legitimate does not automatically alter merely because he has changed his mode of operation… Thus, social work with groups has to be seen as a tactical maneuver intended to help a worker get closer to goals, within a pattern of ethics, which are independently defined." (pp. 30–31)
In this passage, Davies establishes that working with groups in social work practice enables the social worker to operate strategically — that is, to assume a different perspective in order to understand the worldview of the groups being studied and worked with. Assuming a different perspective does not necessarily mean changing one's own perspective; as Davies explained, understanding groups through their worldview is simply a necessary step toward achieving the social worker's objective or goal. The challenge for social workers is to effectively adopt a group's perspective in order to make objective observations, thereby enabling more insightful and contextually informed judgments.
This strategic dimension of group work is closely tied to the broader ethical framework that governs social work as a profession. Because the social worker's core ethics remain constant regardless of whether the mode of engagement is individual or group-based, adopting a group's perspective functions as an observational tool rather than a values shift.
"How group work builds research skills and ethics"
"Group work reshapes definitions of normality"
You’re 48% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.