Racial Disparities in Wrongful Convictions and Sexual Assault Exonerations
This paper investigates racial disparities in wrongful convictions in the United States, with particular focus on sexual assault exonerations recorded between 1989 and 2019. Drawing on data from the National Registry of Exonerations, the study reviews theoretical frameworks distinguishing legal from factual innocence, identifies key causes of wrongful convictions including eyewitness misidentification, prosecutorial misconduct, and juror bias, and documents the disproportionate impact on African American defendants. Using a quantitative methodology combining logistic regression and ordinary least squares analysis, the paper tests two hypotheses: that Black convicts face a higher probability of exoneration from sexual assault convictions, and that post-conviction DNA testing increases that likelihood. Ethical considerations and directions for future research are also addressed.
- Introduction: Overview of wrongful convictions and US exoneration data
- Conceptual Frameworks on Wrongful Convictions: Legal vs. factual innocence and error typologies
- Racial Disparity in Wrongful Convictions: Disproportionate impact on African American defendants
- Research Hypotheses: Two hypotheses on race and DNA exoneration probability
- Methodology and Data: Quantitative design using NRE exoneration database
- Ethical Considerations and Study Limitations: Validity, confirmability, and future research directions
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds the study in concrete exoneration statistics from the National Registry of Exonerations, giving empirical weight to the central argument about racial disparity.
- Clearly states two testable hypotheses, anchoring the quantitative methodology in a transparent theoretical rationale.
- Synthesizes multiple strands of literature — qualitative case studies, regression analyses, and conceptual frameworks — to situate the study within a broader scholarly conversation.
- Presents a summary data table that effectively communicates the distribution of cases by race, sentence length, DNA testing, and age.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates hypothesis-driven quantitative research design. By deriving two explicit hypotheses from prior literature and proposing logistic regression alongside ordinary least squares analysis, the author shows how empirical research questions should flow logically from a theoretical review. This technique — moving from literature synthesis to hypothesis formation to methodology — is a foundational skill in social science research papers.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a broad introduction to wrongful convictions and their prevalence, then narrows to a literature review covering causes, consequences, and conceptual frameworks. A focused section on racial disparity leads directly into the research hypotheses. The methodology section describes the data source, variables, and analytic strategy, followed by a brief discussion of ethical considerations and study limitations. References are formatted in APA style throughout.
Introduction
A widely accepted principle of the justice system is the imperative to bring guilty perpetrators to justice. Consequently, the danger of a guilty person remaining free has long dominated public attention (Bjerk & Helland, 2018). However, the justice system has also been criticized for robbing wrongfully convicted individuals of their freedom and formative life experiences (Gould & Leo, 2010). These flaws have attracted considerable public opinion and research interest. Empirical study of wrongful convictions dates back to the foundational work of Borchard (1932). The introduction of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) testing technology in the justice system subsequently brought these flaws to light by revealing the innocence of convicts — some serving death or life sentences — who remained imprisoned (Bjerk & Helland, 2018). Wrongful convictions occur when factually innocent persons are convicted of crimes, representing a fundamental miscarriage of justice. The conviction of innocent persons in any number challenges the efficacy of the US justice system.
The National Registry of Exonerations (2019) recorded 2,439 exonerations in the United States between 1989 and 2019, representing more than 21,290 years lost by innocent convicts. While non-DNA exonerations amounted to 1,895 cases, DNA exonerations accounted for 484 cases. Homicide cases were the leading category of exonerations at 945 cases, followed by sexual assault at 322 cases, child sex abuse at 266 cases, and all other crimes at 846 cases. The increasing prevalence of exonerations in the US has attracted public, academic, and policy interest, as stakeholders push for a more reliable justice system. Recent scholarship has taken two broad approaches: qualitative case studies and quantitative regression analysis of multiple cases.
Another line of research has focused on the causes and consequences of wrongful convictions. Smith and Hattery (2011) and Zalman et al. (2012) both contributed substantially to this literature. Smith and Hattery (2011) identified false or coerced confessions, class and race disparities, careless forensic work, mistaken eyewitness testimony, unethical police and prosecutorial misconduct, insufficient defense counsel, and juror bias as the primary causes of wrongful convictions. Gould and Leo (2010) observed that wrongful convictions yield psychological trauma, irreversible physical injuries, post-traumatic stress disorder, missed opportunities, severed family ties, and a broader undermining of public trust in the legitimacy of the justice system. Smith and Hattery (2011) also noted the monetary implications, estimating $42 million in lost wages, 7 million lost work hours, and $87 million in expenditure on 250 exonerees by 2011.
References
Ary, D., Cheser, L., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Bjerk, D., & Helland, E. (2018). What can DNA exonerations tell us about racial differences in wrongful conviction rates? Journal of Legal Studies, 34.
Borchard, E. M. (1932). Convicting the innocent: Sixty-five actual errors of criminal justice. Garden City, NJ: Garden City.
Colvin, E. (2009, June). Convicting the innocent: A critique of theories of wrongful convictions. Criminal Law Forum, 20(2), 173–192. Springer Netherlands.
Forst, B. (2004). Errors of justice: Nature, sources and remedies. Cambridge University Press.
Garrett, B. (2017). Actual innocence and wrongful convictions. In Reforming criminal justice.
Gross, S., Possley, M., & Stephens, K. (2017). Race and wrongful convictions in the United States. California.
National Registry of Exonerations. (2019, April 9). Exonerations in 2018. Retrieved from http://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Documents/Exonerations%20in%202018.pdf
Smith, E., & Hattery, A. (2011). Race, wrongful conviction, and exoneration. Journal of African American Studies, 15(1), 74–94. doi:10.1007/s12111-010-9130-5
Zalman, M., Larson, M. J., & Smith, B. (2012). Citizens' attitudes toward wrongful convictions. Criminal Justice Review, 37(1), 51–69.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.