This essay argues that the intensification of racial profiling targeting Arabs and Muslims following the September 11, 2001 attacks represents a serious violation of the constitutional rights and civil liberties guaranteed to all people within the United States. The paper contends that suspecting millions of innocent people based solely on race or religion is both illogical and counterproductive. It further explores how racial profiling damages social cohesion by breeding distrust among Americans, and how the government's disproportionate expansion of power in response to terrorism threatens the very freedoms it claims to protect. The essay concludes that alternative security measures can be strengthened without resorting to discriminatory practices.
The attacks of September 11, 2001 spawned a number of dubious government actions, including the intensification of racial profiling to target Arabs and Muslims. This means that a certain section of American society is under immediate suspicion of terrorism simply for being of a particular race or religion. Tolerance and equality are two of the highest principles treasured by the United States and its inhabitants. The fear and suspicion cultivated by racial profiling, especially after September 11, represents an abomination of the rights guaranteed under the Constitution to all within American borders.
To suspect millions of law-abiding, innocent people of terrorism as a result of the actions of a handful is like suspecting all white males of perversion as a result of a few perverted serial killers. It is illogical and causes more harm than good. The principle that individuals should be judged on their own conduct — not on the characteristics of others who share their race or religion — is a cornerstone of any just legal system.
There are many actions that are genuinely helpful in preventing terrorism. Immigration laws, for example, can be tightened. Airport screening and searching systems can be upgraded. All of these protective measures can be strengthened without having to resort to racial profiling, demonstrating that security and civil liberty need not be treated as mutually exclusive goals.
"Profiling breeds internal suspicion and national division"
"Government overreach threatens the freedoms it claims to defend"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.