This essay examines how employer evaluations of so-called "soft skills" — personality, attitude, and perceived social standing — function as a form of subtle racial discrimination against Black men in the United States. Drawing on scholarship by Moss and Tilly, Pager, and others, the paper argues that implicit bias rooted in neighborhood of origin, physical appearance, and class status prevents qualified Black applicants from accessing employment opportunities. The essay uses HBO's The Wire as a cultural touchstone to illustrate how limited economic opportunity pushes marginalized individuals toward criminal activity, creating a cycle that formal anti-discrimination law has failed to fully disrupt.
The United States is founded on the principle that all men are created equal. Men have fought and died defending this ideal, yet more than two hundred years after the nation's founding, a profound disparity persists between the positions of people in this country based on differences in skin color. In the television program The Wire, a large group of Black men and women find themselves in circumstances where they must commit crimes and other unlawful acts in order to support themselves and their families. In their low-income neighborhoods, selling drugs or engaging in other illicit activity is often the only apparent means of earning enough money to help siblings and children escape these impoverished communities.
According to Philip Moss and Chris Tilly in their article "'Soft' Skills and Race: An Investigation of Black Men's Employment Problems", many people like the characters depicted in The Wire become involved in criminal activity because they are not given financial opportunity by traditional employers. When a person comes from a lower-class part of a community, they are wrongly associated with the more negative aspects of that environment, which in turn prevents social mobility and pushes them toward the very behaviors that reinforce the stereotype.
Soft skills are defined as the specific qualities that a potential employer examines when interviewing prospective employees. Moss and Tilly define them as skills, abilities, and traits that indicate personality, attitude, and behavior rather than formal education and experience (1). These are not credentials, work history, or references; they are the perceived, often inescapable facets of a person's character that an employer reads from an applicant — facets rooted in things largely beyond the applicant's control, including race, social standing, and neighborhood of residence (Lim 2). No matter how much a person has worked to rise above the social class of their birth, a stigma continues to be applied to certain members of the population simply because of their upbringing.
In The Wire, employers perceive Black men from low-income, or "ghetto," parts of the city as less desirable candidates simply because of where they come from. This use of soft-skills assessment is a form of socially ingrained racism, and it is often difficult to identify when such biases are operating. Employers in industries considered less socially elite are more willing to hire people from low-income areas, which is why many men in impoverished neighborhoods end up working in gas stations or convenience stores. Such positions may be the only ones available to them based on how their soft skills are perceived (Pager 779).
A bank, for example, is far less likely to hire a man whose characteristics signal membership in a lower social class. Consider two men interviewing for the same position: the one who appears to belong is more likely to get the job, even if he is substantially less qualified than his competitor. One candidate is clean-shaven with short hair, projecting an image of responsibility and middle-class respectability. The other is physically imposing with a natural hairstyle, and though more qualified, he does not fit the dominant image of a typical employee. Even if both men wear identical suits and give equivalent answers, the first candidate is more likely to be hired because he conforms to the hegemonic ideal of what an employee should look like. This dynamic has been documented in audit studies examining discrimination in low-wage labor markets, where Black applicants consistently receive fewer callbacks than equally qualified white applicants.
"Legal bans on discrimination fail to stop subtle bias"
This reasoning inverts the true causal relationship. It is not social circumstance that creates the criminal; it is the employer who refuses to hire a man because of where he was born who forecloses legitimate opportunity and leaves few alternatives.
The persistence of soft-skills-based discrimination in hiring reveals the gap between America's stated commitment to equality and the lived reality of Black men in the labor market. Legal prohibitions alone cannot eliminate bias that operates through perception, appearance, and neighborhood stigma. Until employers are held accountable for these subtler forms of racial gatekeeping, the cycle of limited opportunity and social marginalization documented by scholars like Moss, Tilly, and Pager — and dramatized in The Wire — will continue.
Fan, C. Simon, et al. "'Soft' Skills, 'Hard' Skills, and the Black/White Earnings Gap." Oct. 2005. Print.
Lim, Nelson. "Who Has More Soft Skills? Employers' Subjective Ratings of Work Qualities of Racial and Ethnic Groups." RAND. Nov. 2002. Print.
Moss, Philip, and Chris Tilly. "'Soft' Skills and Race: An Investigation of Black Men's Employment Problems." Work and Occupations 23.3. Aug. 1996. Print.
Pager, Devah, et al. "Discrimination in a Low-Wage Labor Market: A Field Experiment." American Sociological Review 74. Oct. 2009. 777–799. Print.
You’re 84% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.