This paper proposes ten concrete strategies for reducing law enforcement officers' use of deadly force. Drawing on FBI research showing that officers exercised restraint in 93% of situations where lethal force was legally permissible, the paper argues that further progress is achievable. Recommendations span technological solutions — including advanced protective gear, tranquilizing darts, lasers, and electro-muscular disruption devices — as well as training-based approaches such as Force Science Institute programs, improved handgun training, and Reality-Based Training. The paper also emphasizes psychological and community dimensions, advocating for routine stress management, family support seminars, and police-minority conciliation initiatives as complementary tools for reducing deadly force incidents.
This study guide is drawn from PaperDue's library of 130,000+ paper examples across 47 subjects.
While the media tends to portray law enforcement's use of lethal force as excessive and widespread, empirical data tells a very different story. According to FBI research, officers exercised restraint "in deadly force in 93% of the situations where they legally could have fired their weapons" (Pinizzotto, et al., 2012). Still, progress can be made to reduce the use of lethal force by police officers. This paper offers ten ways to decrease police officers' use of deadly force — or at least to provide the skills and training to help officers cope with danger.
One: Advanced protective gear. Today many officers wear bullet-proof vests, but in the future engineers will be able to design bullet-proof clothing, including headgear and face masks that fully protect the officer from a suspect's gunfire. With such protection, the officer will no longer feel compelled to shoot first during a confrontation and will have greater flexibility in the use of lethal force.
Three: Disabling and tranquilizing darts. Given that tranquilizing darts can incapacitate a bear, they could certainly disable a threatening suspect. The key challenge is equipping officers with this technology in a form that can be deployed quickly when a suspect is dangerous but not armed with a firearm.
Four: Lasers. It is well established that directing a laser at a person's eyes causes temporary blindness. Equipping officers with laser technology could provide a meaningful alternative to lethal force in certain confrontational situations.
Five: Less-lethal technologies. Lasers are among a broader range of non-lethal weapons, including electro-muscular disruption technology and non-lethal chemical agents, that can disable a suspect without causing permanent harm (Schultz, 2008).
Two: Concentrated training through the Force Science Institute (FSI). FSI offers cutting-edge instruction into the dynamics of human behavior during life-threatening encounters. Using sophisticated time-and-motion measurements, the Institute reveals hidden truths about the mental and physical dynamics of dangerous events, delivering these insights through intensive officer training programs.
Seven: Better and more frequent handgun training. One in five small police departments have no annual handgun training requirement. Training programs should address how officers can remain calm in tense, stressful situations and should engage with strategic questions: Should officers shoot to kill, or shoot to disable? These issues need to be reviewed and practiced more than once a year — ideally on a quarterly basis.
Eight: Reality-Based Training (RBT). RBT is a foundational component of most police academy curricula. It should be coupled with ongoing stress management and performance enhancement training throughout an officer's career. Every officer will eventually face a dangerously stressful situation in which a weapon may be needed; resisting the escalation to lethal force requires high-quality, recurring training — including work with psychological professionals in a concentrated setting away from the job site.
"Routine mental health care for officers"
"Bridging police and minority communities"
Reducing police use of deadly force requires a multi-faceted approach combining technological innovation, rigorous training, psychological wellness, and stronger community relationships. From advanced protective equipment and less-lethal devices to Reality-Based Training, family support programs, and community conciliation, the ten strategies outlined in this paper collectively offer a framework for meaningful progress — one that respects both officer safety and the communities law enforcement is sworn to protect.
You’re 58% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.