Religion, Identity, and Political Violence in Israel
This paper examines the multifaceted causes of political violence in Israel, with particular focus on the role of religion, identity, and geopolitical conflict. It argues that religion alone does not explain political violence; rather, economic, social, and political factors interact with religious identity to produce radicalization and violent action. Drawing on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, tensions between ultra-Orthodox communities and secular democratic values, and specific historical events such as the assassination of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, the paper surveys the different forms and expressions of political violence. It also addresses methodological challenges in studying Jewish terrorism and discusses how forms of political violence have evolved over time.
- The Factors of Political Violence: Religion as one of many causes of political violence
- The Relationship Between Religion and Political Violence: Religious identity's role in Israeli-Palestinian conflict
- Religion in Israel: Tension Between Jewish Identity and Democracy: Conflict between religious nationalism and democratic values
- Conceptualizing Political Violence: Definitional challenges and methodological problems
- Types and Expressions of Political Violence in Israel: BDS, settler attacks, armed clashes, and sanctions
- How Forms of Political Violence Have Changed: From bombings to targeted assassination over time
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It avoids monocausal explanations by consistently acknowledging that religion interacts with economic, social, and geopolitical factors rather than acting as a standalone driver of violence.
- It grounds abstract concepts in concrete historical examples — the King David Hotel bombing, the Rabin assassination, and the BDS movement — giving readers tangible anchors for theoretical claims.
- It maintains analytical balance by presenting multiple perspectives, including the ultra-Orthodox viewpoint that their values represent identity and heritage rather than extremism.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates the technique of conceptual unpacking — carefully defining contested terms like "political violence" before applying them analytically. By acknowledging that the word "violence" carries subjective meanings depending on political viewpoint, the author demonstrates intellectual honesty and guards against definitional slippage, a common weakness in political science writing.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a theoretical framework on the causes of political violence, then narrows to the specific role of religion in the Israeli context. Subsequent sections address the tension between Jewish identity and democratic governance, the conceptual challenges of defining political violence, a typology of its forms, and finally a historical narrative tracing how expressions of political violence have evolved. This funnel structure — broad theory to specific case study — is well-suited to political science analysis.
The Factors of Political Violence
Religion does not constitute a silver-bullet explanation for political violence, as there are a multitude of factors that contribute to radical action. For example, there are economic, social, and geopolitical causes that can lead people to take up arms and engage in violent action (Collins, 2009). Religion may instill a sense of identity and purpose for certain groups, and these can be used to justify violent actions. However, it is important to consider the other factors that are at play when analyzing why people engage in politically violent actions.
In addition to economic, social, and geopolitical factors, religion can also play an important role in driving political violence. Religion can provide a sense of identity and purpose for certain groups, and this can be used to justify violent actions (Zaidise et al., 2007). In some cases, religious beliefs can be manipulated to create an "us vs. them" mentality, which is often associated with increased radicalization. Furthermore, religious leaders may use their positions to incite violence or be seen as supporting those who do so. Thus, while religion is not a silver-bullet explanation for political violence, it can be an important contributing factor.
In Israel, for instance, there is a growing tension between religious and political groups. The ultra-Orthodox Jewish community has increasingly embraced religious nationalism, which is at odds with the democratic values of the state of Israel. This has led to clashes between different religious and political groups, including protests against government policies on military service and other issues. Additionally, religious leaders have been accused of inciting violence by using their positions to encourage extremism. This has caused further tension in the country and has become a source of concern for many Israelis.
The Relationship Between Religion and Political Violence
The relationship between religion and political violence is complex and often contested. There are a number of forms of political violence — such as terrorism, civil war, insurgency, and genocide — and religion can be a factor in each of these. For example, in the case of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, religious identity plays an important role in the ongoing tensions (Zaidise et al., 2007). Similarly, in the case of the Rwandan genocide, religious identity was a key factor in determining who was targeted. It is important to consider the diversity of religious traditions and the complexity of religious identity in order to understand how religion can be related to political violence.
In Israel, religious identity has been used as a factor in political violence. The ongoing conflict between Israeli and Palestinian groups has been deeply affected by religious identity. Religious leaders from both sides of the conflict have used their positions to incite violence and call for extreme action. Additionally, religious nationalism has been a source of tension, as the ultra-Orthodox Jewish community has embraced religious values that secular political leaders view as a threat to the democratic character of the state (Zaidise et al., 2007). Secular political leaders and groups in Israel who feel threatened by ultra-Orthodox religious groups include the Labor Party, the Meretz Party, the Likud Party, the Yesh Atid Party, and the Blue and White Party. Several non-governmental organizations, such as Hiddush and the Israel Democracy Institute, are also actively working to protect Israeli democracy from what they view as the growing power of religious extremists. Yet for the ultra-Orthodox, their religious views are not extreme but rather an important part of their Jewish identity — one that connects them to what they regard as their ancient and sacred history and heritage.
Because the region is claimed by so many different religious groups — from Jews to Christians to Muslims — religious symbols and sites have also been used as rallying points for political violence, such as when Palestinian demonstrators gathered at the Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem to protest Israeli policies. All of these examples demonstrate how religion can be a factor in political violence in Israel. Ultimately, however, the deeper motivations involve a sense of identity, a claim to place, a feeling of power or powerlessness, and the desire to act boldly on one's beliefs out of a sense of religious, social, and political justice.
Religion in Israel: Tension Between Jewish Identity and Democracy
Religion plays an important role in Israeli political life, and the tension between Jewish predominance and democracy is an ongoing challenge. The state of Israel was founded with a mandate to ensure the safety and security of the Jewish people while also guaranteeing the rights of all citizens regardless of their religious identity. This has created a tension between the need to protect the Jewish character of the state and the need to uphold individual rights for all citizens — a tension exacerbated by the rise of religious nationalism and by ongoing disputes between different religious and political groups.
The Israeli Declaration of Independence, for example, declares Israel to be a Jewish state while simultaneously guaranteeing equal rights to all citizens regardless of religious identity (Kramarow, 2013). This dual commitment has proven difficult to sustain in practice. The rise of religious nationalism has intensified pressure to elevate religious values in public life, while the government has simultaneously sought to limit the authority of religious courts and the autonomy of religious communities — moves that have been met with resistance from certain religious groups. All of these dynamics contribute to the ongoing tension between religious identity and democratic governance in Israel.
References
Collins, R. (2009). Micro and macro causes of violence. International Journal of Conflict and Violence (IJCV), 3(1), 9–22. https://www.ijcv.org/index.php/ijcv/article/download/2790/2551/
Eck, K. (2012). In data we trust? A comparison of UCDP GED and ACLED conflict events datasets. Cooperation and Conflict, 47(1), 124–141.
Kramarow, A. S. (2013). Synagogue and state: Bringing balance to the role of religion in Israeli law. J. Transnat'l L. & Pol'y, 23, 157. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/jtrnlwp23&div=9&id=&page=
Pedahzur, A., & Ranstorp, M. (2001). A tertiary model for countering terrorism in liberal democracies: The case of Israel. Terrorism and Political Violence, 13(2), 1–26.
Zaidise, E., Canetti-Nisim, D., & Pedahzur, A. (2007). Politics of God or politics of man? The role of religion and deprivation in predicting support for political violence in Israel. Political Studies, 55(3), 499–521.
Zanotti, J., Weiss, M. A., Ruane, K. A., & Elsea, J. K. (2017). Israel and the boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) movement. Current Politics and Economics of the Middle East, 8(3), 285–328. https://www.proquest.com/openview/46251726033c337f310294e4b10ac594/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2034880
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.