Ottoman Empire to Erdogan: Turkey's Authoritarian Continuity
This paper examines the structural and ideological continuities between the Ottoman Empire and modern Turkey under Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Beginning with the Ottoman foundations of Sunni Islamic identity, military power, and bureaucratic authoritarianism, the paper traces how these tools of social control and hegemony persisted through Atatürk's secular republic and into the Erdogan era. The analysis highlights how Erdogan's invocation of Ottoman nostalgia, religious conservatism, identity politics, and suppression of dissent mirrors the sultanate's methods of governance. The paper also considers countervailing forces—women's activism, Kurdish resistance, social media, and democratic institutions—that complicate Erdogan's consolidation of power.
- The Ottoman Foundations of Power and Hegemony: Ottoman Empire's military, religious, and economic power bases
- Turkey's Transition and the Persistence of Authoritarianism: Atatürk's reforms and lingering authoritarian elements in Turkey
- Erdogan's Neo-Ottoman Vision: Erdogan invoking Ottoman identity to legitimize his rule
- Religion, Identity, and Social Control: Islam and identity construction as tools of political hegemony
- Challenges to Erdogan's Hegemony: Women, Kurds, and social media challenging authoritarian control
- Conclusion: Erdogan as an Extension of the Ottoman Legacy: Synthesis of Ottoman-Erdogan continuity and Turkey's future
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper constructs a clear historical arc, moving logically from Ottoman origins through Atatürk's republic to Erdogan's regime, allowing the argument about authoritarian continuity to build steadily across sections.
- It balances political, religious, and cultural dimensions of hegemony, showing how each reinforces the others rather than treating them as isolated phenomena.
- The paper acknowledges countervailing forces — women's movements, Kurdish dissent, social media — giving the argument nuance and avoiding an overly deterministic thesis.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of comparative historical analysis, drawing direct structural parallels between Ottoman and contemporary Turkish governance while grounding each claim in cited scholarly and journalistic sources. This technique allows the writer to make a longitudinal argument without relying on chronological narrative alone.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an overview of Ottoman power and its mechanisms, then introduces the Turkish republican transition before pivoting to Erdogan's explicit invocation of Ottoman identity. Subsequent sections examine religion and identity construction as tools of hegemony, then complicate the argument by surveying opposition forces. The conclusion synthesizes the comparison and gestures toward future possibilities for Turkish democracy.
The Ottoman Foundations of Power and Hegemony
The Turkic tribes transformed themselves from a disparate, fragmented collection of peoples into a hegemonic and organized empire. Lasting for centuries and making a profound impact on global politics, the Ottoman Empire built its status and power on bureaucratic authoritarianism and on the fusion of religion and politics. As the bastion of Sunni Islam, the Ottoman Empire colonized regions far beyond what are now the borders of the modern nation-state of Turkey. Moreover, the Ottoman Empire encompassed a wide range of linguistically and ethnically diverse peoples, capitalizing on access to global trade routes to bolster power and influence in and beyond Eurasia. The use of military might, economic influence, and religious and cultural tools for social control and hegemony all characterized the Ottoman Empire at its height.
Turkey's Transition and the Persistence of Authoritarianism
At the beginning of the twentieth century, shifting balances of power, modernization, and the dismantling of authoritarian regimes trended worldwide and facilitated the breakdown of the Ottoman Empire. A new identity for the modern nation-state of Turkey emerged under the secular leadership of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk. Atatürk transformed many of the Ottoman political, social, and economic institutions under the rubric of nationalism and republicanism. Yet at its best, Turkey could only be called "semi-democratic," due to the persistence of authoritarian elements within the regimes of the last century (Somer, 2016, p. 481). Even prior to the ascendance of Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Turkey was a "flexible authoritarian regime," with a hegemony described as "fragile" (Metinsoy, 2011, p. 1). The nature of its authoritarianism and hegemony may have shifted between the early Ottoman Empire and the current Erdogan regime, but the core features remain the same.
Both as the Ottoman Empire and as the Republic of Turkey, the prevailing model has been that of the "strong state," in which "the state is always prioritized at the expense of individual freedoms and civil society" (Gardels, 2018, p. 1). The Ottomans recognized the importance of military prowess in suppressing revolts and dissent while also perpetuating patriarchal norms. Erdogan's tactics have been the same: using force to suppress dissent and preventing the emergence of pluralism or alternative voices that would threaten the fragile hegemony (Gardels, 2018).
References
Ergul, F. A. (2012). The Ottoman identity: Turkish, Muslim or Rum? Middle Eastern Studies, 48(4), 629–645. doi:10.1080/00263206.2012.683337
Gardels, N. (2018). Authoritarianism is changing the very fabric of society. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/theworldpost/wp/2018/06/26/turkey-election/
Metinsoy, M. (2011). Fragile hegemony, flexible authoritarianism, and governing from below: Politicians' reports in early republican Turkey. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 43(4), 699–719.
Somer, M. (2016). Understanding Turkey's democratic breakdown: Old vs. new and indigenous vs. global authoritarianism. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 16(4), 481–503.
Yavuz, M. H. (2018). Erdogan's Ottomania. Boston Review, 8 August 2018. http://bostonreview.net/politics/m-hakan-yavuz-erdogan-ottomanophilia
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.