This essay examines the escalating cost of higher education in the United States, where tuition and fees at some private institutions exceed $50,000 per year, leaving students with six-figure debts. The paper considers a potential solution modeled on European countries that offer free college tuition, outlining both the benefits — broader access and a more competitive workforce — and the significant drawbacks, including increased taxpayer burdens and concerns about academic aptitude. Ultimately, the essay argues that rising college costs disproportionately harm the middle class and calls on policymakers to seek balanced, effective solutions.
The costs of a college education in the United States are spiraling out of control. Tuition, room, and board at some private institutions exceed $50,000 a year. Financial aid can help defray costs, but some students still find that out-of-pocket expenses are far greater than their financial resources can cover. In some instances, families raid their savings accounts or assume second mortgages on their homes. Students may find, upon completing an undergraduate degree, that they have six-figure debts that will take decades to repay. Rising costs of college have outpaced inflation and salaries, with tuition hikes occurring virtually every year. What can be done?
In some European countries, students do not pay to attend college — institutions of higher learning are free. This model may offer a solution to the dilemma of high college costs that the U.S. government should consider. It would allow students to attend college without placing severe financial burdens on their families. Without financial barriers, more students would be able to pursue education beyond high school. A more educated population would also make Americans more competitive in the global marketplace.
Unfortunately, this solution creates as many problems as it appears to solve. In the first place, free education is not truly free. The financial support needed for faculty, support staff, and all expenses related to facilities must come from somewhere. If students and their families do not bear the burden directly, they will have to bear it indirectly in the form of higher taxes. All large-scale government programs must be funded with taxpayer dollars; there is no other way to cover costs.
Taxpayers who do not attend college, or who do not have children who attend college, will very likely be unhappy about tax hikes designed to cover the cost of "free" college education for all. Students and their families would likely view higher taxes as a form of forced savings, but people without children would probably not share that view. Higher taxes would not serve as forced savings for these individuals — they would represent added expense that could create real hardship for some households.
"Aptitude and alternatives challenge universal college access"
There are pros and cons to the argument for providing free college education to all citizens in the United States. One's stance on the issue is likely a reflection of personal circumstances. A college education can, in some cases, cost more than a home — traditionally considered the biggest purchase one would make in a lifetime. If costs continue to escalate as they have, college will be available only to the very wealthy and, perhaps, to the very poor who receive generous financial aid packages. The middle class may be left out of the equation entirely.
You’re 61% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.