Root Cause Analysis Policy for Infant Discharge Safety
This paper presents a Root Cause Analysis (RCA) policy developed for a medical center addressing the sentinel event of discharging a newborn to the wrong family. It outlines the institution's Patient Safety Evaluation System (PSES) framework, defines key terms such as sentinel event and adverse event, and establishes reporting and follow-up procedures for staff and supervisors. The appendix applies The Joint Commission's RCA framework to identify root causes across communication, equipment and healthcare IT, task and process, staff performance, team, and management factors. The policy aims to reduce newborn misidentification incidents through systematic analysis, structured reporting protocols, and corrective action guided by a dedicated Patient Safety Officer and committee.
- Policy Overview and Objectives: Institutional commitment to patient safety reporting
- Key Definitions: Definitions of sentinel event, adverse event, and RCA
- Staff Reporting Procedures: Staff duties for reporting and documenting safety events
- Patient Safety Event Reporting System: Step-by-step online reporting and supervisor follow-up
- Role of the Patient Safety Officer: Oversight, committee structure, and board reporting
- Root Cause Analysis: Appendix and Causal Factors: Joint Commission RCA framework applied to newborn switching
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper combines a formal policy document with an applied root cause analysis appendix, giving it both procedural and analytical value — a structure that mirrors real institutional policy writing.
- Each root cause category (communication, environmental, equipment, task, staff, team, management, and organizational culture) is addressed systematically using The Joint Commission's RCA framework, demonstrating rigorous, evidence-based analysis.
- The inclusion of specific workflow scenarios — such as the handoff chain from delivery room to mother — grounds abstract policy language in concrete clinical reality, making the analysis actionable.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied policy writing informed by academic research. Each procedural directive is supported by cited evidence — for example, connecting staff burnout to patient safety outcomes (Hall et al., 2016) and care transition errors to misidentification risk (Josephson, 2016). This technique shows students how to anchor institutional policy in peer-reviewed literature rather than relying solely on organizational authority.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a standard policy document structure: a policy statement introduces the institutional commitment; a definitions section clarifies terminology; a procedures section specifies staff responsibilities and reporting steps, including a 48-hour follow-up timeline; a section on the Patient Safety Officer's role addresses oversight and governance; and an appendix applies The Joint Commission's RCA framework across eight causal factor categories to analyze the specific sentinel event.
Policy Overview and Objectives
In the pursuit of improving patient safety and quality of care, it is the policy of the medical center (PMC) to use the Patient Safety Evaluation System (PSES) to collect, analyze, and submit information about patient safety events to a Patient Safety Organization (PSO). The specific patient safety event addressed here — the sentinel event of discharging an infant to the wrong family — should be scrutinized through quality surveillance to deeply examine actual or perceived issues within PMC facilities. The reporting of patient safety events, particularly the sentinel event of newborn switching, is both obligatory and encouraged.
The policy for reporting this patient safety event should be communicated to all hospital staff and facilities so that surveillance methods can be initiated for the prompt detection of actual events and relevant perceived issues. The processes and workflows associated with the sentinel event should be improved so that human behavior can be modified, errors reduced, and patient safety maximized (Strategic Radiology, n.d., p. 4).
Key Definitions
Sentinel event: A sentinel event is one in which patient safety is compromised — not necessarily due to natural causes such as the patient's illness — and may result in any of the following:
— Death
— Permanent harm
— Severe, temporary harm
Severe, temporary harm: Severe, temporary harm is considered critical when its effects are life-threatening and last for a limited time. In the case of a sentinel event such as the discharge of a newborn to the wrong family, severe psychological torment would result. The prolonged stress experienced by the affected family could produce serious medical conditions requiring a higher level of care.
Adverse event: An adverse event is one that results in harm to the patient.
Root cause analysis: Root cause analysis is a comprehensive and systematic review of a problem that occurred within an organization (see Appendix). The framework used here includes 24 questions designed to ensure that assessment of the event is thorough and complete.
Staff Reporting Procedures
Any incident involving a patient must be reported through online means so that the directly involved departments and staff can be contacted immediately ("Patient Safety Event Reporting," n.d.). The urgency of the situation must be determined on the spot as soon as the sentinel incident is reported, even if it is conveyed verbally to a supervisor. The Sentinel Event Policy should be followed for sentinel events such as the misassignment of a newborn to the wrong bay or the discharge of a newborn to the wrong family. Responsibility then falls on the supervisor to communicate the event to the House Manager, Chief Nursing Officer (CNO), Assistant Vice President (VP) of Nursing, Unit Director, Chief Regulatory Officer (CRO), and Patient Safety Officer.
The patient safety event report should be completed immediately — preferably by the end of the shift — so that the urgency of the sentinel event is addressed without delay. All pertinent data must be included in the report, such as staff involved in handling the newborn and a full account of the newborn's transfer from one section of the hospital to another until delivery to the mother. Facts should be stated clearly and concisely to prevent ambiguity. Personal opinions, inessential comments, and assumptions should be omitted. In accordance with disclosure guidelines, facts about the patient safety event, physician notifications, patient interventions, the patient's response, and disclosure should be included in the medical record. The reference to the patient safety report should not appear in the patient's medical record.
Additionally, all staff members should be informed that the patient safety event report is confidential and for internal organizational use only. It must not be discussed in front of other hospital staff or visitors, in adherence to the hospital's patient confidentiality policy. The patient safety event report is strictly for the organization's internal operations and must be privileged for PMC's internal use.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.