SAIC Revenue Diversification and Risk Management Strategy
This paper examines the strategic challenges facing Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), whose revenue is approximately 90% dependent on U.S. Department of Defense contracts. The paper identifies this concentration as the company's core vulnerability and evaluates two potential solutions: diversifying into private-sector markets by leveraging existing capabilities, and restructuring costs to remain profitable amid declining defense budgets. The analysis concludes that revenue diversification is the superior strategy, despite requiring a significant cultural and organizational shift. The paper also addresses the risk dimensions of entrepreneurial expansion, drawing on literature regarding emotional intelligence and risk mitigation in organizational change contexts.
- SAIC's Core Vulnerability: Defense Contract Dependency: 90% DoD revenue concentration as strategic weakness
- Proposed Solutions: Diversification vs. Cost Restructuring: Two options: expand markets or trim operating costs
- Selecting the Best Strategy: Diversification chosen over cost-reduction approach
- Risk Assessment and Mitigation: Entrepreneurial risk managed through emotional intelligence
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Clearly identifies a single core problem — over-reliance on one customer — and evaluates solutions in direct relation to that root cause.
- Uses a comparative framework to contrast two solutions, then explicitly argues why one is superior, demonstrating analytical rigor rather than merely describing options.
- Integrates peer-sourced references on entrepreneurship and emotional intelligence to ground strategic recommendations in management theory.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates solution ranking with explicit justification: rather than presenting options neutrally, the author evaluates each against the identified root problem and argues that the superior solution is the one that directly addresses the cause rather than merely managing its symptoms. This is a hallmark of applied strategic analysis at the undergraduate business level.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by stating the core problem and naming relevant industry competitors for context. It then presents two proposed solutions in sequence, evaluates them comparatively, and selects one as optimal. The final section shifts to risk assessment, acknowledging the inherent uncertainty in entrepreneurial strategy and drawing on organizational behavior literature to propose mitigation approaches. The reference list supports both the entrepreneurial and risk-management arguments.
SAIC's Core Vulnerability: Defense Contract Dependency
SAIC's fundamental problem is its vulnerability to downturns in U.S. defense spending, as approximately 90% of its revenue comes from defense contracts. No company is without risk when it relies on a single major customer. The solution is to diversify revenue streams. A look at the competitive landscape — which includes IBM, HP, and Accenture — reveals large, diversified organizations that are not dependent on Department of Defense (DoD) business in the same way SAIC is. There is no reason SAIC cannot diversify its business away from that dependency.
Proposed Solutions: Diversification vs. Cost Restructuring
In order to execute a diversification strategy, SAIC will need to identify areas where it can apply its existing capabilities and market them to the private sector. This will likely require a shift in organizational mindset and culture, because there are significant differences between competing for private-sector business and competing for DoD contracts.
A lesser — but still viable — alternative is to restructure the business around the expectation of reduced revenue in coming years. This means scaling back operating costs so that the company remains profitable even if defense business declines. SAIC would seek to become a more efficient organization: retaining much of its capability while trimming unnecessary overhead. Under this approach, the company would still be dependent on the DoD, but that dependency would not necessarily threaten its profitability. This is clearly a second-best option, but it remains possible.
References
Dunn, S. (2003). Can emotional intelligence help your company with risk management? ManagerWise. Retrieved June 27, 2015, from http://www.managerwise.com/article.phtml?id=405
Kent, R. (2001). Entrepreneurs work hard to avoid risk. ManagerWise. Retrieved June 27, 2015, from http://www.managerwise.com/article.phtml?id=136
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.