Semiotic Analysis of a Kim Kardashian Fragrance Ad

Introduction to Semiotics and the Advertisement

Semiotics — also referred to as semiotic studies — is the study of signs and the processes by which those signs operate. It is used in conjunction with many other fields, including linguistics, media studies, cultural anthropology, and marketing. Applying a semiotic perspective to a Kim Kardashian product advertisement therefore proves effective for illuminating how the ad communicates and what messages it conveys. Key terminology within semiotic studies includes metaphor, symbolism, intertextuality, metonymy, and more. This paper uses semiotics to decode the signs in the advertisement, and further employs it to explore iconography, ambiguity, mode of address, and connotation — ultimately producing a semiotic reading of the Kim Kardashian fragrance advertisement in question.

Describing the Visual Content

Before the semiotic analysis can begin, some basic information about the photograph must be established. The photograph is an advertisement featuring Kim Kardashian's self-titled fragrance. Its content shows Kardashian wearing pink lingerie and a feathery white coat that falls to her waist. She is leaning or sitting on the edge of a metallic ring. Her name, logo, and a caption for the fragrance appear in the upper left corner, while two bottles of the perfume are diagonally positioned in the bottom right corner. Additional text describing where the fragrance can be purchased runs along the bottom of the ad.

The color palette of the advertisement is pink, black, and white. The only elements outside this palette are Kardashian's lips, which are blood red, and her skin, which is a yellow-tinted brown. She is partially upright, with at least one arm extended out to the side. Her legs are partially crossed and her mouth is slightly open. A jeweled accessory holds her hair in place. Notably, Kardashian looks directly into the camera.

Cultural Context and Intended Audience

Semiotic analysis is often predicated on the relativity of culture. As one framework for understanding this notes:

"Culture is not simply a collection of unrelated practices and representations. There is something consistent in culture; something that repeats and reinforces the same meanings across various practices and mediations. Culture shapes our way of being and self-identity in a collective sense; our sense of individuality is drawn from meanings and values that we share in common." (Tutorial 1, provided)

This is precisely why market research includes cultural research. Advertisements effective in one country will often fail in another with a significantly different cultural context. The intended audience of this advertisement is Western — likely American and European — particularly since the Kardashians became celebrities within American culture and are based there.

Semiotic Decoding: Body, Language, and the Commutation Test

The caption for the fragrance in the ad reads "The Voluptuous New Fragrance." Voluptuous is a word used to describe beautiful and seductive women, which Kardashian actively markets herself as. She adheres to traditional standards of beauty and aesthetics in American culture. The word was also used to describe classic American beauty icons such as Marilyn Monroe. The intentional use of voluptuous works to connote and establish a metonymy between Kardashian and other iconic figures of beauty and celebrity. Her body functions as the primary syntagm in this regard.

Applying the commutation test clarifies this point. If Kardashian's body were altered — for instance, if she were seated fully upright with her hair down — the ad's message would change substantially. A great deal of the advertisement's focus falls on her chest, which is well lit and enhanced with makeup to illuminate her neck and torso. With her hair down, this detail would be obscured. Voluptuousness, as a cultural sign, derives from the hourglass silhouette of chest and hips. If she were seated upright, the curvature of her hips would similarly be lost. The commutation test thus confirms that each element of her pose is a deliberate sign contributing to the advertisement's overall meaning.

Conclusion

This advertisement operates on the signs of Western beauty and the traditional ideology of femininity. By conventional standards, it is a highly effective ad. From a feminist perspective, it is far more problematic. A semiotic reading reveals the modus operandi employed by the advertisers — both to entice consumers to purchase the fragrance and to encourage them to emulate Kardashian as a cultural figure. The visual codes of confinement, passivity, and the sexualized body work together to produce meaning that simultaneously celebrates and constrains female identity.

References

Abrams, N., Bell, I., & Udris, I. (2001). Studying Film & Studying the Media. Oxford University Press: UK.

Austin, T. & Barker, M. (Eds.) (2003). Contemporary Hollywood Stardom. Oxford University Press: NY.

Berger, J. (1972). Ways of Seeing. Chapter 1, pp. 7–10; 45–47. Penguin Books: London.

Burgin, V. (1977). Looking at Photographs. Available from: stunik.com/vu/DFAP/LookingAtPhotographs.pdf. Retrieved June 23, 2012.

Chandler, D. (1995). Semiotics for Beginners. Available from: www.dominicpetrillo.com/ed/Semiotics_for_Beginners.pdf. Retrieved June 25, 2012.

de Saussure, F., Bally, C., Sechehaye, A., Reidlinger, A., & Wade, B. (1974). Nature of linguistic sign. Course in General Linguistics, Chapter 1, pp. 65–68.

Eriksson, T. (2009). Semiotics of digital photography. Available from: www.init.ituniv.se/~thommy/.../semiotic_thommyeriksson.pdf. Retrieved June 24, 2012.

Sonesson, G. (1989). Semiotics of Photography — On tracing the index. Available from: www9.georgetown.edu/.../Sonesson-Semiotics_of_Photography.pdf. Retrieved June 25, 2012.

Van Leeuwen, T. (2004). Semiotics and iconography. Handbook of Visual Analysis. Available from: www.sfu.ca/cmns/courses/.../Vanleeuven_SemioticsIconography.pdf. Retrieved June 24, 2012.

Willis-Tropea, L. (2011). Glamour photography and the institutionalization of celebrity. Photography & Culture, 4(3), 261–276.