This paper examines the history and impact of sexual abuse of female inmates in United States correctional facilities. Drawing on scholarship from the William and Mary Law Review, Human Rights Watch, and the Journal of Sex Research, the paper explores custodial sexual misconduct by corrections officers, inmate-on-inmate sexual coercion, and the role that pre-incarceration abuse histories play in heightening female prisoners' vulnerability. The paper also addresses the institutional consequences of such abuse, including contraband introduction, civil and criminal litigation, the spread of sexually transmitted diseases, unwanted pregnancy, and — most critically — the undermining of rehabilitation efforts. The paper concludes with policy recommendations centered on stricter enforcement, stronger laws, and increased recruitment of female corrections officers.
The paper demonstrates effective synthesis of heterogeneous sources. Rather than summarizing each source in isolation, the writer weaves together legal scholarship, empirical research, and journalistic evidence to support a cumulative argument. The use of direct quotation from primary sources — such as the Human Rights Watch report and the William and Mary Law Review — adds authoritative specificity to otherwise broad claims about systemic abuse.
The paper opens with a brief framing introduction before moving into a literature-review-style body that covers research findings, vulnerability factors, reporting barriers, and inmate-on-inmate abuse. A dedicated "Impact" section then pivots from documentation to consequences, addressing rehabilitation, legal liability, and public health. The "Summary" section recaps the evidence and closes with normative policy arguments, giving the paper a clear three-part shape: context, evidence, and implications.
The sexual abuse of inmates has long been discussed primarily in the context of male prisoners preying upon other male prisoners. However, in recent years the prevalence of sexual abuse among female inmates has greatly increased. This abuse is often perpetrated by corrections officers but also occurs between prisoners. The purpose of this discussion is to examine the history and impact of sexual abuse of female inmates in United States correctional facilities.
For many years, research on inmate sexual abuse focused on male prisoners and the abuse they suffer at the hands of other male inmates. Only recently have researchers begun to examine the sexual abuse of women in prison as a distinct and serious problem warranting dedicated attention.
According to an article published in the William and Mary Law Review, the sexual abuse of female inmates by Bureau of Prisons personnel — commonly referred to as custodial sexual abuse — is a serious and widespread problem throughout United States prisons. The article documents that women prisoners complain of male corrections officers refusing to leave their cells so they can dress, caressing their breasts and other parts of their bodies, pulling down their pants in front of them, touching themselves, making lewd and offensive comments, following them around the facility, assigning them to their offices as clerks, watching them use the bathroom and shower, entering the unit without warning, and frequently promising them favors and presents in exchange for sexual activity.
One of the most comprehensive studies concerning the sexual abuse of female inmates was conducted in 1997, when Baro researched the chronic problem of custodial sexual abuse in a small women's prison in Hawaii. Baro interviewed female inmates and also reviewed court and prison records detailing the abuse of inmates. The research found that between 1982 and 1994, there were 38 documented cases of custodial sexual abuse in Hawaii. Of those thirty-eight cases, thirty involved male corrections officers and eight involved female corrections officers. The alleged abuses included unwanted pregnancies, forced intercourse, and the operation of a prostitution ring at a hotel located near the prison. Baro concluded that many female inmates were particularly vulnerable because of drug addiction, making them easy targets for prison staff.
The William and Mary Law Review article further points out that sexual abuse of female inmates is an issue in both federal and state prisons, with abuses carried out by both male and female corrections officers. The article also notes that in recent years the legal profession, the media, and corrections facilities have begun to pay greater attention to this problem. According to the American Correctional Association, most female inmates were sexually abused between the ages of five and fourteen, most often by a male family member. Because of this history, many female inmates are particularly fearful of their male guards.
Statistics vary on the exact proportion of female inmates who suffered sexual abuse or domestic violence before going to prison; however, it is generally believed that between 48 and 88 percent of incarcerated women in America have been abused prior to their incarceration. This history of abuse has an enormous impact on how these women respond to confinement. Through their relationships with male guards, women who have experienced prior sexual abuse often re-live earlier trauma and suffer flashbacks, particularly when male guards conduct searches and pat-frisks. Incarcerated women tend to respond to abusive male authority in prison in the same manner as they did before their confinement.
As one source quoted in the William and Mary Law Review article observes: "The women are so needy and in need of love, they are set up for oppression. The only way they know is to exchange their bodies [to meet this need]." Past abuse causes the women to be hypersensitive and leaves them more vulnerable to attack while incarcerated. Research has indicated that women with a history of prior abuse who are sexually victimized in custody "suffer psychological symptoms or an exacerbation of their symptoms," including depression and the development or worsening of post-traumatic stress disorder. Custodial sexual misconduct also poses serious risks for the spread of sexually transmitted diseases and for unwanted pregnancy.
You’re 36% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 4 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.