This paper provides a critical review of Christine Sleeter's 2009 article "Developing Teacher Epistemological Sophistication About Multicultural Curriculum: A Case Study," published in Action in Teacher Education. The review summarizes Sleeter's central argument that teacher thinking — not just teaching technique — is the key variable in multicultural curriculum development. It examines the case study methodology used to track a novice white teacher working in a diverse classroom, the four-dimensional rubric Sleeter applied to measure epistemological growth, and the qualitative conclusions drawn. The paper also offers an independent critical analysis, noting that while Sleeter's core premises resonate with truth, the research's subjective tone and self-referential framing limit its scientific credibility and broader applicability.
This paper demonstrates the technique of critical article review: the writer first faithfully reconstructs the source article's argument and methods, then systematically evaluates their strengths and weaknesses. The most effective moment is when the reviewer identifies a contradiction — that Sleeter's call for epistemological objectivity is undermined by her own first-person, philosophically invested writing style — and supports this claim with a direct quotation from the article itself.
The paper opens with an introduction that maps out its own structure, then moves through four analytical sections — theoretical premises, procedures, method of analysis, and conclusions — before closing with a summary that delivers the writer's overall critical verdict. This mirrors the IMRaD-adjacent structure appropriate for a social science article review, adapted for a qualitative source. The conclusion section is where the paper's independent voice is most prominent.
Sleeter's (2009) research helped to identify and address important issues within the realm of education, specifically addressing the challenges and biases that teachers hold when developing curriculum for students. The purpose of this article review is to account for the arguments presented in the aforementioned article and to develop some independent analysis that can be helpful in applying the data in a more practical and localized fashion.
This review first describes the topic and then explains how it was scientifically explored through the positing of certain ideas and premises. It then examines the procedures the research undertook to arrive at its results. The conclusions are subsequently discussed to determine the results, validity, and applicability of the work, before offering a final summary that relates the work to today's educational situation and how it may best be applied in a real-world context.
The main thrust of this article is examining not what teachers are thinking but how teachers are thinking. This approach is useful because it examines systematic patterns to model success and failure. The researcher was curious to explore how teachers think about curriculum and what influences are present in their development processes. To accomplish this, a special case study was developed that followed and tracked the experiences of a young, novice teacher and her encounters with this topic.
The research is premised upon the idea that teachers are significant curriculum creators, and that this role plays an extremely important part in the overall quality of education presented to students. To investigate the significance of this idea, the research posed important questions: "How does teachers' thinking about curriculum develop in the context of teacher education coursework? How might an analysis of a novice teacher's learning to think more complexly inform teacher education pedagogy?" In other words, the article evaluates the learning processes of teachers by investigating how they themselves experience learning at the same time they are developing classroom curriculum.
The article also aimed to dispel the notion that there is an objectively correct, or universal, method of teaching multicultural curriculum. It challenged the idea that a simple step-by-step method can be applied generically as a panacea. The research further attempted to help teachers develop more sophisticated means of organizing knowledge and increasing their epistemological acumen.
To prepare the reader for the ideas being discussed, the article presented certain assumptions and provided definitions to guide understanding. Sleeter emphasized that recognizing different frames of reference and developing a relative understanding of one's environment are key to designing multicultural curriculum. What is missing, however, is a precise definition of multiculturalism itself and how it is understood within society. The author simply assumed that multiculturalism is important and has a useful place within the classroom — a baseline assumption suggesting that the author is arguing for multiculturalism as a necessary quality in curriculum design and creation.
To illuminate and address the questions raised in the article, the researcher used the case study method to highlight her main points and build an argument supporting her premises. The case study subject was selected from a larger group of evaluated students. The researcher chose a student referred to here as [Student] because she was a novice teacher who satisfied the requirements of being a graduate student in a multicultural design class while also holding responsibilities for developing curriculum in her own classroom. The author wrote, "I wanted to focus my attention on a beginning teacher, who was relatively new to multicultural education, open to learning and teaching in a diverse classroom."
[Student] was a second-year teacher who had relocated from a different part of the country to her current teaching position. She was a young white woman teaching fifth grade in a school serving a very diverse student population. This was a new experience for [Student], but her dedication to learning about it made her an ideal subject for analysis. Data were gathered from papers [Student] completed during her coursework, a journal of observations, notes from two observations of [Student] teaching the unit she designed after the course had ended, and a 40-minute tape-recorded interview with [Student] conducted following the author's classroom observations.
Sleeter, C. (2009). Developing teacher epistemological sophistication about multicultural curriculum: A case study. Action in Teacher Education, 31(1), 3–13.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.