Southwest Airlines SWOT and IFE Matrix Strategic Analysis
This paper presents a comprehensive strategic analysis of Southwest Airlines, tracing its origins as a small Texas intrastate carrier to its position as the largest domestic airline in the United States. Using an Internal Factor Evaluation (IFE) matrix and a SWOT analysis, the paper identifies Southwest's core strengths — including its cost leadership model, loyal workforce, strong brand, and financial resilience — alongside key weaknesses such as limited international routes, heavy reliance on passenger revenues, and an aging product offering. The paper concludes with strategic action plans designed to leverage existing strengths and address identified weaknesses, including market penetration into new cities and diversification into international markets.
- Introduction and Company Background: Southwest's founding, growth, and competitive model
- Internal Factor Evaluation (IFE) Matrix: Weighted scoring of internal strengths and weaknesses
- SWOT Analysis: Four-quadrant strategic overview with key factors
- Reasons for Strength: Financial strength, leadership, brand, and teamwork culture
- Reasons for Weakness: Revenue limits, declining margins, and contractual burdens
- Strategic Action Plans: Recommendations to leverage strengths and fix weaknesses
- Conclusion: Southwest as industry benchmark with future priorities
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds its analysis in concrete financial data — passenger revenue figures, market share percentages, credit ratings, and free cash flow — giving the strategic claims real evidential weight.
- The IFE matrix is presented with full numerical detail (weights, ratings, and weighted scores), demonstrating a disciplined application of a recognized strategic planning tool rather than a simple list of talking points.
- The SWOT section moves beyond mere identification: the "Reasons for Strength" and "Reasons for Weakness" subsections explain the underlying business dynamics behind each factor, adding analytical depth.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates the use of quantitative strategic frameworks — specifically the IFE matrix and the SWOT chart — to convert qualitative observations into structured, comparable scores. This technique, common in strategic management courses, shows how analysts transform narrative information about a firm into actionable planning inputs. The final IFE total score of 3.05 is explicitly interpreted as a measure of overall internal competitive position, illustrating how the tool produces a summary judgment rather than just a list.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a historical background section that contextualizes Southwest's competitive model. It then presents the IFE matrix in full detail — first listing and explaining all strengths and weaknesses, then presenting the weighted scoring table. A SWOT chart follows, supported by extended analytical commentary on each quadrant. The paper closes with concrete strategic recommendations organized by whether they leverage strengths or address weaknesses, followed by a brief conclusion. This progression from diagnosis to prescription reflects a standard strategic management case study structure.
Introduction and Company Background
Southwest Airlines began as an ambitious company by offering flights from Love Field Airport in Dallas to Houston and San Antonio. It started modestly with just three planes and three Texan destinations, and currently owns hundreds of planes and flies millions of people to many cities. Even though Southwest was operating in a sector of the economy known at that time for its bankruptcies and huge financial losses, the firm reported its 38th straight profitable year in 2010 (The Saylor Foundation, 2014).
The company started its operations in 1971 at Dallas Love Field Airport after winning a four-year court case against two local airlines — Texas International Airlines and Braniff, both of which are now defunct. The two firms argued before a Texas court that there was insufficient demand to sustain three intrastate airlines. The legal battles, and later the bruising pricing wars between Southwest and those two firms, forced Southwest to create a new operating model that eventually helped the airline survive and thrive. The firm introduced affordable fares and a lively advertising campaign based on the "Luv" theme, which helped it develop a reputation for fun and cost-effectiveness (Johnson & Hall, 2009).
The firm grew from three airplanes to become the largest domestic airline in the United States, achieving 38 straight years of profitability. Since its inception, the firm has placed greater emphasis on customer satisfaction rather than on automation as the key to its business success. However, by 2002 its then-Chief Financial Officer and later CEO Gary Kelly acknowledged that automation would be crucial to meeting the firm's strategic goals. Based on this realization, the company began developing a solid IT foundation. This automation infrastructure was introduced to support key processes, including the sector's first-ever paperless ticketing system and web application (Afshar, Saeb, Tadros, Mehra, & Gautam, 2010).
What caused Southwest Airlines to succeed where other airlines have not? Historically, the company has differed from others in the industry in several significant ways. Many large U.S. airlines operate on a "hub and spoke" system, routing their passengers via a hub airport on their way to other cities, and Southwest is no exception. The firm has, however, managed to become more efficient than its competitors. While many large airlines operate a variety of different airplane models, Southwest utilizes only one type of jet: the Boeing 737. This enables the airline to service its fleet easily and efficiently. Maintenance mechanics and flight engineers need only to learn how to work on one type of jet, in contrast to their counterparts at other airlines who must develop technical expertise across multiple aircraft types. Also, unlike its rivals, the firm does not offer assigned seats in advance, which contributes to greater operational efficiency (The Saylor Foundation, 2014).
Southwest Airlines also maintained the lowest operating-cost model in the domestic airline industry and consistently offered the lowest air fares. Its customer service ranked among the best in the industry. By 2001, the airline had more than 35,000 employees and recorded approximately $5.6 billion in operating revenues from a 68.1% passenger load factor. Its trading abbreviation on the securities exchanges was LUV, which symbolized both the airline's headquarters at Dallas Love Field Airport and its relationships with clients and staff (Govindarajan & Lang, 2002).
Internal Factor Evaluation (IFE) Matrix
An evaluation of the internal strengths and weaknesses — based on the case study and several references as of 2009 — yields the following information.
1. Southwest Airlines has effectively implemented a cost leadership approach.
2. Southwest Airlines is known for its excellent customer service: the airline earned the Department of Transportation's (DoT) Triple Crown for five consecutive years based on its on-time service, baggage handling, and the lowest number of passenger complaints. The firm has also won first place in the National Airline Quality Rating for three consecutive years.
3. Staff loyalty: the airline has a loyal, lively, and employee-centered culture. The firm's mission statement reflects these values, resulting in a loyal workforce willing to put in extra effort to achieve the firm's objectives.
4. Thirty-seven successive years of profitability (1972–2009).
5. An 85% fuel hedge position.
6. Accumulated over 42.2 billion Revenue Passenger Miles (RPMs).
7. An impeccable public image.
8. A strong and professional management team.
9. A $13 billion market value.
10. By 2009 the firm operated 388 jets.
11. The average age of its jets is 8.4 years.
12. The company is the fourth-largest U.S. airline.
13. Southwest Airlines consistently records higher-than-industry growth rates.
14. The company has a strong IT infrastructure, with 54% of its revenues generated via its online ticketing system (compared to 50% in 2003).
15. 75% of its flight tickets are booked online (Therith, 2010).
1. The firm has a weak mission statement. Although the firm's goals appear to be communicated broadly, the mission statement does not explicitly state what industry the firm operates in.
2. The firm relies on a single producer for all its jets. Using only one type of jet could attract significant negative press if problems with that aircraft model arise.
3. A very high proportion of Southwest's staff are full-time employees, resulting in very high overhead costs.
4. The firm operates only one type of jet — the Boeing 737.
5. Southwest does not fly to destinations outside the continental United States; it services only 63 cities in 23 states.
6. It is difficult to convince passengers that Southwest offers benefits that other airlines do not.
7. The firm does not have special seats or facilities for severely handicapped passengers.
8. Southwest does not fly to several significant large cities, such as Atlanta and Charlotte.
9. The airline does not offer a first or business class service and does not provide assigned seating.
10. The airline does not offer any form of in-flight meals (Therith, 2010).
By evaluating the internal audit above, the IFE matrix produces the following results. Key internal factors are weighted between 0.0 and 1.0, and rated between 1 and 4, yielding a weighted total score.
Strengths
1. Southwest has effectively implemented a cost leadership approach — Weight: 0.07, Rating: 3, Score: 0.21
2. Southwest Airlines is known for its great customer service — Weight: 0.07, Rating: 3, Score: 0.21
3. Staff loyalty — Weight: 0.07, Rating: 4, Score: 0.28
4. 37 successive years of profitability — Weight: 0.04, Rating: 4, Score: 0.16
5. 85% fuel hedge position — Weight: 0.07, Rating: 4, Score: 0.28
6. 42.2 billion RPMs — Weight: 0.04, Rating: 3, Score: 0.12
7. Excellent public image — Weight: 0.07, Rating: 4, Score: 0.28
8. Strong and professional management team — Weight: 0.07, Rating: 4, Score: 0.28
9. $13 billion market value — Weight: 0.04, Rating: 3, Score: 0.12
10. By 2009 the firm had 388 jets — Weight: 0.04, Rating: 3, Score: 0.12
11. The average age of its jets is 8.4 years — Weight: 0.04, Rating: 4, Score: 0.16
12. Fourth-largest domestic airline — Weight: 0.03, Rating: 4, Score: 0.12
13. Southwest consistently records higher-than-industry growth rates — Weight: 0.07, Rating: 3, Score: 0.21
14. Strong IT infrastructure with 54% of revenues generated via online ticketing — Weight: 0.02, Rating: 3, Score: 0.06
15. 75% of flight tickets are booked online — Weight: 0.03, Rating: 4, Score: 0.12
Weaknesses
1. The firm has a weak mission statement — Weight: 0.02, Rating: 1, Score: 0.02
2. The firm relies on a single producer for all its jets — Weight: 0.01, Rating: 1, Score: 0.01
3. Very high overhead costs due to high proportion of full-time employees — Weight: 0.03, Rating: 2, Score: 0.06
4. The firm only operates one type of jet, the Boeing 737 — Weight: 0.01, Rating: 1, Score: 0.01
5. Southwest does not fly outside the continental United States; services only 63 cities in 23 states — Weight: 0.04, Rating: 2, Score: 0.08
6. Difficult to convince passengers that Southwest offers benefits others do not — Weight: 0.01, Rating: 2, Score: 0.02
7. Single jet type could attract negative press if problems arise with the Boeing 737 — Weight: 0.01, Rating: 1, Score: 0.01
8. The firm does not have special seats or facilities for the severely handicapped — Weight: 0.01, Rating: 1, Score: 0.01
9. Southwest does not fly to significant large cities such as Atlanta and Charlotte — Weight: 0.05, Rating: 1, Score: 0.05
10. The airline does not offer first or business class, nor assigned seating — Weight: 0.01, Rating: 1, Score: 0.01
11. The airline does not cater to any form of in-flight meals — Weight: 0.01, Rating: 2, Score: 0.02
12. The firm only flies to domestic destinations and offers no international flights — Weight: 0.02, Rating: 1, Score: 0.02
Total — Weight: 1.00, Score: 3.05
SWOT Analysis
The following SWOT framework summarizes the key internal and external strategic factors facing Southwest Airlines.
Strengths: Financial resources; Southwest is a reputable brand; strong domestic network; exceptional business leadership; deliberate effort to employ individuals with a team-oriented attitude.
Weaknesses: Negligible ancillary revenue opportunities; outdated products; falling revenues and profits; heavy reliance on passenger revenues; many contractual obligations.
Opportunities: Recovery of the domestic airline industry; acquisition of AirTran Holdings; revival of U.S. tourism; affordable airfares; diversification into international flights.
Threats: Stiff competition; regulatory restrictions; volatility in oil markets; increasingly rising costs; terrorist attacks.
Conclusion
Southwest is a trend-setting benchmark competitor in the airline industry. The airline has effectively extended and maintained its innovations — for instance, ticketless travel, employment of underutilized airports, and boarding passes downloaded at home before going to the airport. The strategic recommendations that emerge from this analysis include continued incremental expansion, sustaining the attributes that have driven the airline's success, conservative growth management, price containment, and strong employee engagement (Southwest Airlines: Outstanding Service at the Lowest Fares, 2009).
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.