This paper examines Starbucks as a global coffee company, assessing its mission, values, and organizational objectives before analyzing the competitive and environmental forces it faces. The paper then evaluates Starbucks' compensation and reward strategies against two criteria: alignment with overall organizational strategy and the maintenance of competitive advantage amid changing conditions. Drawing on surveys, industry rankings, and financial data, the paper concludes that Starbucks' generous benefits, stock options, health coverage, and culture of respect produce high employee satisfaction and low turnover, enabling the company to consistently meet its organizational goals and outperform competitors.
This study guide is drawn from PaperDue's library of 130,000+ paper examples across 47 subjects.
The paper demonstrates strategic alignment analysis — it does not evaluate the compensation system in isolation but explicitly tests it against two external criteria: fit with organizational strategy and capacity to sustain competitive advantage. This dual-criterion framework gives the evaluative sections a structured, argument-driven quality.
The paper follows a logical four-part arc: (1) company overview and mission, (2) environmental analysis identifying threats and opportunities, (3) detailed description of the compensation system, and (4) evaluative discussion linking compensation outcomes to organizational performance. The conclusion synthesizes all sections to deliver a reasoned verdict. This structure mirrors a standard business report format, making it suitable as a model for undergraduate management or HRM assignments.
Starbucks is the largest coffee retailer in the world, operating 19,555 stores across 58 countries. This includes 12,811 locations in the United States, 1,248 in Canada, 965 in Japan, 766 in Great Britain, 580 in China, and 420 in South Korea. Starbucks has succeeded to the point where its reputation as the foremost coffee destination is virtually unassailable. Its logo, brand, and patents are well established, and the company benefits from motivated, loyal employees, strong supplier relationships, and deep customer loyalty.
Starbucks has won numerous awards and accreditations, including being rated one of Fortune's Top 100 Companies to Work For in 2005. This reputation has been further reinforced by at least one popular book on the "Starbucks experience." The company is also recognized for its sustainability performance. Its environmental mission states: "Starbucks is committed to a role of environmental leadership in all facets of our business."
The Starbucks mission is: "To inspire and nurture the human spirit — one person, one cup, and one neighborhood at a time." Starbucks' vision, objectives, and goals are to achieve full effectiveness across six core areas: their coffee, their partners, their customers, their stores, their neighborhoods, and their shareholders. The company commits to being passionate, treating one another with respect and dignity, embracing diversity, making their stores places of solace and comfort, caring for the environment, and rewarding their shareholders.
The organization has cultivated the concept of the "Starbucks experience," which employees embrace as a unifying identity. The mission, values, and objectives are clearly articulated and serve to align employees around a shared purpose, reinforced by a distinctive Starbucks corporate culture.
The environment in which Starbucks operates presents both significant opportunities and notable threats. On the competitive front, the company faces pressure from fast food chains and other coffee manufacturers. Although Starbucks has largely outlasted this competition, the fact that more than three-quarters of its outlets are located in the United States represents a potential vulnerability. There has also been a tendency to prioritize expansion over internal growth: during the early 2000s, for instance, the company opened a new store every single day. This rapid expansion was interrupted by the 2007–2008 recession, which compelled Starbucks to close 300 locations (Miller, 2009).
Another environmental challenge relates to the product itself. Although Starbucks continuously innovates, the inherent limitations of a coffee-focused offering logically raise questions about the long-term scope for innovation. The economic downturn presented a further threat, as consumers began to budget more carefully or seek lower-cost alternatives. Product pricing is also a weakness — driven partly by the rising cost of coffee beans in developing countries and the increasing cost of dairy products — and this plays into the hands of competitors including restaurants, street vendors, and supermarkets.
Some of those competitors have become increasingly formidable. The 2007 Consumer Reports assessment of American fast-food chain coffees rated McDonald's Premium Roast as the "cheapest and best," judging it superior to Starbucks in all evaluated areas. The magazine described Starbucks' brand as "strong, but burnt and bitter enough to make your eyes water instead of open" (Miller, 2009).
Additional environmental pressures include a national trend toward healthier lifestyles and reduced caffeine consumption, as well as negative publicity arising from the treatment of farmers in coffee-supplying developing countries. Starbucks has also faced unpredictable political challenges in some of the countries where it operates and has acquired a reputation in certain quarters as an aggressively expansionist corporation with anti-competitive tendencies (Damien, 2009). Finally, because the company's competitive identity is so closely tied to retail coffee, it may be slow to diversify should market conditions change.
On the opportunity side, Starbucks has significant potential to expand into markets such as India and the Pacific Rim. Co-branding arrangements with manufacturers of other food and beverage products have already proved lucrative, and the company has successfully branched into peripheral offerings such as music and ice cream. The rapid pace of technological innovation — including digital platforms and social media — also presents opportunities to showcase products online and develop new distribution channels.
The company's organizational style is team-oriented, flexible, and innovative. It also places emphasis on environmentalism, social responsibility, and Fair Trade practices.
According to Fortune magazine, Starbucks ranks as the number-two best company to work for among large companies, and the number-one best place to work when both small and large companies are considered together. In its January 24 issue, Fortune noted: "The coffee behemoth is justly famous for its generous benefits. One example: Part-timers and their same- or opposite-sex partners receive comprehensive health coverage. Hypnotherapy? Covered. Naturopathy? Ditto." Average annual pay for salaried employees is $44,790, while for hourly employees it is $35,294.
In its 100 Best Companies to Work For list for 2006, Fortune ranked Starbucks 29th, noting that part-time employees qualify for $500 in tuition reimbursement. The career intelligence site Vault similarly identifies Starbucks as a fixture on the Fortune Best Companies and Fortune 500 lists, and a popular employer among both undergraduate and MBA students.
According to Workforce, compensation at Starbucks is generous and reviewed regularly. Incentives are meaningful, employees are frequently promoted on merit, and staff are encouraged to develop deep knowledge of coffee. Customer satisfaction is central to the performance system: the more skilled and diligent an employee is in pleasing customers, the greater their opportunity to earn bonuses. Researchers who develop new products or innovations are also rewarded generously.
Starbucks' philosophy toward its employees — and, by extension, its customers — is captured in the phrase "leave no one behind." In practice, this means all employees, including part-time workers, receive full health coverage encompassing medical, dental, vision, and alternative health services. An Employee Assistance Program (EAP) is available to all staff. The "Bean Stock" stock option plan (worth up to 14% of gross pay) allows employees to share in the company's growth, and more than one employee has used these options to help purchase a home. A stock investment plan also allows employees to purchase Starbucks stock at a discount (84% of fair market value) through payroll deductions. In addition, Starbucks matches employee contributions to its "Future Roast" 401(k) plans, contributing between 25% and 150% of the first 4% of pay, depending on length of service.
The compensation system extends beyond pay and benefits to encompass the dignity and respect accorded to employees. Counter staff, for example, are called "baristas" rather than "counter help," and survey data show that employees cite the "opportunity to work with an enthusiastic team" and "work in a place where I feel I have value" as key reasons for their job satisfaction (Workforce).
Starbucks actively works to meet its employees' needs, encouraging staff — referred to throughout the organization as "partners" — to submit complaints and questions, which are reviewed and answered by a dedicated two-person team. One such submission through the Mission Review process led directly to Starbucks extending its military reserve policy to protect the jobs, salaries, and healthcare benefits of employees who served following September 11 and during the Iraq War.
The cumulative effect of these measures is reflected in an 82% employee satisfaction rate, as recorded in a Hewitt Associates Starbucks Partner View survey (2006).
In short, Starbucks' compensation system not only matches its overall organizational strategy but also succeeds in maintaining competitive advantage in the face of new challenges and changing conditions, making it one of the most attractive companies to work for. The alignment between the company's stated mission and values on the one hand, and the tangible rewards and respect it offers its employees on the other, represents a coherent and effective human resource strategy. Based on the evidence reviewed, no fundamental amendments to the existing compensation approach appear necessary.
You’re 72% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.