Systematic Study of Organizational Behavior Explained
This paper examines organizational behavior as a discipline grounded in systematic, data-driven analysis of employee attitudes and conduct within organizations. It traces the historical development of the field from scientific management through the post-World War era, then surveys the contributions of five behavioral sciences — psychology, sociology, social psychology, anthropology, and political science — to the discipline. The paper also addresses contemporary challenges such as globalization and workforce diversity, explores the evolving balance between intuition and rational measurement, and critically evaluates recurring criticisms of organizational behavior research, including concerns about external validity, the theory-practice gap, and the common-sense nature of many findings.
- Introduction to Organizational Behavior: Definition, origins, and historical development of the field
- Behavioral Sciences Contributing to Organizational Behavior: Five disciplines and their distinct contributions
- Globalization and Diversity as Emerging Challenges: How globalization and diversity reshape management demands
- Intuition Versus Systematic Study in Modern Organizations: Balancing rational measurement with managerial intuition
- Criticisms of Organizational Behavior Research: Validity gaps, theory-practice divide, and common-sense findings
- Conclusion: Overall value and limitations of organizational behavior study
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper clearly defines organizational behavior before tracing its historical roots, giving readers necessary context before introducing complexity.
- The survey of five contributing disciplines is well-organized, with each science distinguished by its specific analytical focus, helping readers understand how each adds a unique dimension to the field.
- The paper balances advocacy for systematic study with honest engagement with criticisms, lending the argument intellectual credibility and balance.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper effectively uses synthesis across multiple sources — including Bartlett, Hofstede, and Thomas and Tymon — to build a multi-layered argument. Rather than presenting each source in isolation, the writer integrates them into a coherent narrative about the evolution and limitations of organizational behavior as a discipline. This technique demonstrates the ability to use secondary sources as evidence for a broader analytical claim.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a logical funnel structure: it opens with a definition and historical overview, broadens into a survey of contributing disciplines, then narrows again to address current challenges and concluding criticisms. Each section builds on the last, moving from theoretical foundations to practical tensions. The conclusion concisely restates the central tension between the value and the limitations of systematic organizational behavior research.
Introduction to Organizational Behavior
As the name suggests, organizational behavior studies both the way in which people act within an organization and the attitudes they display within that context, on a non-random basis. Consequently, this discipline aims at providing an accurate, scientifically rigorous overview of the behavioral traits characteristic of employees by replacing intuition with systematic study. In other words, it is not grounded in simple observation but in data that are appropriately collected, measured, and interpreted.
From a historical point of view, organizational behavior as a discipline dates back to the era of scientific management — a concept that implied rationalizing organizations in order to achieve higher productivity. Over time, the trajectory of the discipline was shaped by different trends. After the First World War, a major emphasis was placed on human factors, while the Second World War re-introduced the rationalist perspective into the limelight. These shifts were also driven by contributions from various behavioral sciences, including psychology, sociology, social psychology, anthropology, and political science.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.