This essay examines Joseph Tainter's article "Social Complexity and Sustainability," focusing on three core ideas: the distinction between sustainability and resilience, the role of complexity as humanity's primary problem-solving tool, and the importance of historical awareness in avoiding societal collapse. The paper explains Tainter's economic framing of complexity—where societies invest in complex strategies whose shared benefits outweigh initial costs—and explores how complexity can reach a point of diminishing returns. It concludes by reflecting on what a genuine move toward sustainability requires, arguing that "staying in the game" demands recognizing the double-edged nature of complexity itself.
What does moving toward sustainability really entail? Joseph Tainter's article "Social Complexity and Sustainability" makes a crucial distinction at the outset, differentiating sustainability from resilience. Sustainability entails a society's ability to continue along in current patterns or modes of existence, whereas resilience is a society's ability to adjust and reorient itself during conditions of change. It is possible that unsustainable policies or activities may have put us in a position where drastic changes are to be expected, and where resilience may be something we all require — but as Tainter notes, "the goal of human groups is more often sustainability or continuity than resilience" (Tainter 92). Yet the concept of resilience is important for understanding Tainter's insight that "given the role of complexity in both sustainability and collapse, 'success' consists substantially of staying in the game." This essay considers Tainter's insight while pondering the question of what a move toward sustainability might indeed entail.
Tainter's idea of "complexity" is an important one, although he defines it largely in economic terms. The basic sense is that complexity is the most profound and adaptable human tool for dealing with environmental challenges. In Tainter's economic definition, societies invest in complex strategies — such as complex technologies — as a technique of problem-solving, and the shared economic benefit ultimately outweighs the initial investment. His concept of complexity is by no means limited to environmental challenges, however; he shows how complexity can be applied to systems of information, such as the educational establishment or the current U.S. health care system.
His reliance on an economic definition of complexity is important because it establishes that, at a certain point, complexity may reach a point of diminishing economic returns and might even begin to cause problems rather than solve them. This matters because in our current social model, complexity has become the primary problem-solving tool — and in a situation where the problem is one of unsustainability, complexity itself may add to the problem substantially. As Tainter notes, "a society or other institution can be destroyed by the cost of sustaining itself" (Tainter 99).
"How past collapses reveal complexity's double-edged nature"
"Staying in the game through diverse adaptive strategies"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.