Essay Undergraduate 669 words

Tax Incidence and Legal Liability: Understanding Burden Shifting

~4 min read

Abstract

This paper explains the distinction between tax incidence (the actual distribution of tax burden) and legal liability (who is required to remit the tax). Using supply and demand elasticity, the paper demonstrates how taxes shift burdens between producers and consumers despite statutory designations. It then categorizes tax bases into three major classes—consumption, income, and wealth—and analyzes their respective advantages, disadvantages, and fairness implications. The paper emphasizes that individual economic decisions determine tax base values and that income taxes better measure ability to pay despite higher administrative costs.

📝 How to Write This Type of Paper Writing guide — click to expand

▼

What makes this paper effective

Clear conceptual distinction: The paper sharply separates tax incidence from legal liability, grounding the difference in economic mechanism (supply/demand elasticity) rather than abstract assertion.
Concrete example: The gasoline tax illustration makes the burden-shifting mechanism intuitive and traceable—showing how a buyer-facing tax reduces demand, lowers seller revenue, and ultimately shifts burden to sellers.
Structured comparison: The second section systematically covers three tax bases, noting their relationships, distinguishing factors, and trade-offs (e.g., double taxation of savings under income tax).
Fairness lens: The paper concludes with a normative assessment—income taxes measure ability to pay better than alternatives, despite higher costs—grounding tax policy in equity principle.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper employs comparative categorical analysis with illustrative example. It introduces a complex principle (tax burden shifting) via a worked case, then systematizes three alternatives (tax bases) along multiple dimensions (revenue potential, compliance cost, fairness). This combination—specific example plus systematic taxonomy—helps readers grasp abstract economic logic and evaluate trade-offs across options.

Structure breakdown

The paper follows a two-part structure. Part 1 (one section) addresses a single mechanism: why legal liability does not determine actual burden. Part 2 (one extended section with implicit subsections) catalogs and evaluates three tax bases. A brief closing synthesizes by positioning income tax as the fairness benchmark. The progression moves from explaining one phenomenon, to classifying alternatives, to evaluating them—a logic common in policy and microeconomics papers.

Tax Incidence and Legal Liability

The incidence of a tax measures the distribution of the tax burden among producers and consumers. The party that remits the tax, however, is independent from whoever ends up bearing the tax burden in the long run. This is because the inelasticity of the demand and supply of a good determines the portion of tax that will be paid (Hyman, 2011). The party that may be legally liable to pay a tax may be different from the party that ends up bearing the tax burden because when a tax is imposed on a good, it affects the supply and demand of that particular good, which changes the equilibrium prices. These changes in prices are the ones responsible for the shifting of the tax burden away from the person entitled to pay the tax.

Hyman (2011) uses an example of a unit tax imposed on gasoline to explain this. If the market price of gasoline is subjected to a unit tax, for each gallon of gasoline that is bought, the buyers would pay the tax in addition to the market price. This precludes the sellers from paying the tax and the buyers become legally liable. Hyman further explains that in doing this, the sellers' marginal cost fails to increase and the tax is deducted from the marginal benefit each gallon gives to the consumers. The reduction in the demand for gasoline as a result of buyers paying the taxes causes backward shifting to sellers accompanied by a decline in the market price of gasoline.

The Three Major Classes of Tax Bases

Therefore, the ability to evade taxes among various economic units changes the tax collection point, which determines the party that ends up bearing the tax burden. When this ability differs, the tax burden has to shift because the identity of the taxpayer impacts the specific prices that are paid after the tax.

A tax base can be described as the measure that determines the tax liability, since taxes are levied upon various economic activities. According to Alink and Kommer (2011), common tax bases are grouped into three major categories: consumption, income, and wealth. Individual decision making greatly determines the values of the three tax bases; hence they can also be described as economic bases. An individual's income is often described as the total products and services they consume in a year plus their annual savings. The yearly consumption, therefore, is the income less the portion of the income saved in a given year. On the other hand, a person's net wealth is the economic value of their total investments and savings in a given period, based on various assets such as shares and property (Alink and Kommer, 2011).

There is a relationship between various categories of tax bases. The consumption of an individual in a year, for instance, is often equal to their income minus savings. However, there are a few distinguishing factors between the two bases. Alink and Kommer (2011) note that income is often taxed on a personal basis, hence considers the circumstance of a taxpayer, while consumption is taxed on a product and service basis, which do not account for a taxpayer's situation. Compared to consumption taxes, savings are also taxed twice by income taxes. This creates an economic disparity because savings should be taxed at the point they are consumed if consumption is used as a tax base; and for income tax, when money is saved after tax has been deducted.

1 Locked Section · 156 words remaining

Comparative Advantages and Fairness Considerations · 156 words

"Revenue, cost, and equity trade-offs across tax base types"

You’re 84% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.

130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime

Key Concepts in This Paper

Tax incidence Legal liability Burden shifting Supply and demand elasticity Consumption tax Income tax Wealth tax Tax base Ability to pay Double taxation