Prisoner of War Economics: Barter, Cigarettes, and Money
This paper examines the economics of prisoner-of-war camps through the lens of monetary theory. It analyzes why cigarettes functioned as a form of currency — and why they were also problematic — by exploring their intrinsic value, susceptibility to supply and demand, and dual nature as both a commodity and a medium of exchange. The paper also compares monetary systems to barter, defines arbitrage and distinguishes pure from near-arbitrage, discusses the entrepreneurial role in camp trade, and evaluates whether the POW exchange system produced a just distribution of goods. Together, these questions illuminate fundamental principles of economics in a unique historical setting.
- Cigarettes as Currency: Strengths and Weaknesses: Intrinsic value and supply-demand limits of cigarette money
- Advantages of Currency Over Barter: Why monetary systems outperform barter in efficiency
- Arbitrage in the POW Camp: Pure vs. near arbitrage illustrated by POW traders
- The Role of the Entrepreneur: How Sam's mart regulated prices and encouraged trade
- Justice and Distribution in the POW Exchange System: Fairness critique of the POW exchange economy
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It grounds abstract economic concepts — commodity money, arbitrage, entrepreneurship — in the concrete, high-stakes setting of a POW camp, making theory immediately accessible.
- It consistently moves from definition to application, citing scholarly sources (Brown, Damodaran, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas) before connecting them to specific examples from the camp.
- The final section shows critical thinking by evaluating the fairness of the system rather than simply describing it, acknowledging the gap between ideal and real-world markets.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates the technique of using an extended analogy as a pedagogical framework. By treating the POW camp as a miniature economy, the author is able to isolate and examine one monetary variable at a time — such as supply of cigarettes vs. supply of bread — without the noise of a modern economy. This makes causal relationships between economic forces easier to identify and explain.
Structure breakdown
The paper is organized as a Q&A response to five discrete economic questions. Each section opens with the question, provides a definition or theoretical framework drawn from cited sources, and then applies it to the POW camp scenario. The final section shifts from descriptive to normative analysis, offering the student's own evaluative judgment. This structure suits an exam-style or study-guide assignment and progresses logically from basic monetary theory toward more complex evaluative reasoning.
Cigarettes as Currency: Strengths and Weaknesses
Cigarettes can be considered a good form of currency because of their intrinsic value. Due to this intrinsic value, a cigarette would never become completely worthless. A paper dollar, with enough inflation, becomes nearly worthless because it holds no value outside of the economic construct. Cigarettes, however, as a highly addictive good, would always carry value even in times of inflation.
At the same time, cigarettes are a problematic form of money because they are a multifunctional commodity. Unlike paper or metal currency, cigarettes are not merely a unit of exchange value — they are also a consumable good. Prisoners with tobacco addictions were severely disadvantaged in this barter system; they effectively became the poor of the camp economy. Furthermore, cigarette money is heavily governed by the law of supply and demand. In times of high supply, cigarettes had less value as currency than in times of low supply and high demand. When the Red Cross delivered large shipments of cigarettes, the increased supply drove the price of other goods upward to reflect the diminished value of each cigarette. Conversely, when rations stopped, the price of goods fell and prisoners were willing to sell bread for fewer cigarettes, because each individual cigarette carried higher value.
The danger of using such a commodity as a monetary unit is that other goods being bought and sold with cigarette money were also subject to the law of supply and demand. When bread rations were low, the value of bread was high, so bread would sell for a greater number of cigarettes than when bread was abundant. During periods of scarcity, both the supply of tradeable goods and the supply of cigarette currency declined simultaneously, causing both to reach high value at the same time. This is generally not the case in modern paper-money economies. When the iPhone or "Tickle Me Elmo" were in short supply, prices skyrocketed, but the number of dollars in circulation did not also become scarce. Conversely, in times of economic depression, when there is insufficient money circulating, people tend to spend less, and products become overabundant, at least in the short run.
Advantages of Currency Over Barter
According to Pamela Brown in Constitution or Competition: Alternative Views on Monetary Reform, the calculation of exchange in a monetary system is far more efficient than in a barter system. Because everyone wants money, it eliminates the need for intermediate trades. For example, if someone wants a new pair of shoes, they go to the shoe store and pay for them directly. In a barter system, however, the shoe seller may only want steak — so the buyer must first trade his own goods, say apples, for steak, and then bring that steak to the shoe seller. This process can be tremendously inefficient.
Additionally, hard currency has a long shelf life, unlike perishable goods such as apples, and its worth is immediately known. Any economic system that involves taxation is further advanced by monetary exchange, because it is far easier to tax one standardized form of currency than to calculate how many apples a citizen owes in taxes.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.