Teaching and Learning Arabic as a Foreign Language in the US
This paper addresses key questions in the teaching and learning of Arabic as a foreign language, with a focus on the United States context. Topics covered include the rapid growth in Arabic language enrollment at American universities, the concept of diglossia and its H and L varieties, strategies for developing fluency through extensive reading and audiolingual approaches, how learners acquire receptive skills differently in reading and listening, vocabulary instruction techniques, the role of grammar in Communicative Language Teaching (CLT), comprehension across the four language modalities, and the challenges and strategies associated with providing corrective feedback in the language classroom.
- Arabic Language Teaching in the United States: Demand and Growth: Enrollment trends and growth of Arabic programs
- Diglossia and the Functions of H and L Varieties: Definition and contexts of H and L language varieties
- Strategies for Improving Fluency: Audiolingual and extensive reading fluency approaches
- Acquiring Receptive Skills: Reading and Listening: Brain-based differences in reading vs. listening acquisition
- Teaching Verbal and Nonverbal Vocabulary: Phonics, read-aloud, and vocabulary building strategies
- Grammar, CLT, and Adult Language Learners: CLT methodology and the role of explicit grammar instruction
- Comprehension Across the Four Language Modalities: Speaking, writing, listening, and reading comprehension compared
- Corrective Feedback: Challenges and Strategies: Approaches to delivering sensitive and effective feedback
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The Q&A format provides clear organizational structure, making each conceptual topic easy to locate and follow.
- The paper draws on well-established theoretical frameworks — including Krashen's comprehensible input theory, Ferguson's diglossia, and dual coding theory — grounding practical teaching strategies in research.
- Enrollment statistics and MLA data are used concretely to establish the real-world relevance of Arabic instruction in the United States.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper effectively bridges theory and practice throughout. For example, when discussing fluency, it references Day and Bamford's (2002) ten criteria for extensive reading and connects them directly to classroom application. This pattern — citing a theoretical source and then explaining its pedagogical implication — is a strong academic technique that demonstrates both content knowledge and practical awareness.
Structure breakdown
The paper is structured as a series of eight question-and-answer responses, each addressing a distinct topic in Arabic language pedagogy. The questions progress from macro-level context (enrollment trends, diglossia) to micro-level classroom practice (vocabulary strategies, corrective feedback), creating a logical arc from theory to application. The reference list at the end follows APA formatting and supports all cited claims.
Arabic Language Teaching in the United States: Demand and Growth
In the United States, there is a strong case that Arabic teaching is gaining traction and maturing as a vocation. Arabic classes in colleges and universities showed a staggering 92.5 percent increase in enrollment — from 5,505 in 1998 to 10,584 in 2002 (Al-Batal & Belnap, 2006; Ryding, 2006). In 2016, enrollment in Arabic classes increased by a further 51.5% (Looney & Lusin, 2019). According to the Modern Language Association (MLA), the number of American students enrolling in Arabic programs is likely to continue rising for various reasons, including the United States' direct military involvement in the Middle East. Many institutions have expanded or introduced full-fledged Arabic programs into their curricula, and several universities have developed new summer programs in the Arab world. Based on these trends, it is clear that demand for Arabic language instruction in the USA is growing substantially.
Diglossia and the Functions of H and L Varieties
Diglossia is a relatively stable language situation in which a secondary, highly codified variety exists alongside the primary spoken dialect of a language. It is a superposed variety serving as the vehicle for a large and respected body of written literature, either from an earlier period or from another speech community. This variety is learned largely through formal education and is used for most written and formal communication (Ferguson, 1959).
The use of the H (high) and L (low) varieties depends on the nature and context of the communicative function. In formal and public settings — such as sermons, school instruction, and official correspondence — the H variety is used. In informal settings, such as conversations between friends or the telling of folk stories, the L variety is used.
Strategies for Improving Fluency
One effective first step is the use of audiolingual approaches, which emphasize oral proficiency. In keeping with Krashen's (1991) comprehensible input theory, Day and Bamford (2002) proposed a set of ten criteria for extensive reading in a second language (L2). At least part of the motivation for assigning substantial reading is to help students develop fluency and appreciation for reading in a second language. The following criteria are outlined by Ryding and Allen (2013):
1) Reading materials should be easy enough to understand — students should be able to grasp 98 percent of words in a text without assistance. 2) A wide range of reading materials on various themes should be available. 3) Students should read whatever they wish. 4) Students should read as much as they can. 5) Reading is frequently done for enjoyment, knowledge, or a better grasp of a topic. 6) Reading is a reward in and of itself. 7) A faster reading speed is preferable to a slower one. 8) Reading is done individually and in silence. 9) Teachers provide orientation and guidance to their students. 10) The teacher serves as a role model for readers.
References
Al-Batal, M., & Belnap, R. K. (2006). The teaching and learning of Arabic in the United States: Realities, needs, and future directions. Handbook for Arabic Language Teaching Professionals, 389–399.
Day, R., & Bamford, J. (2002). Top ten principles for teaching extensive reading. Center for Language & Technology.
Ferguson, C. A. (1959). Diglossia. Word, 15(2), 325–340.
Goh, C. C. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners' listening comprehension problems. System, 28(1), 55–75.
Krashen, S. D. (1991). Bilingual education: A focus on current research. National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education, Washington, DC.
Looney, D., & Lusin, N. (2019, June). Enrollments in languages other than English in United States institutions of higher education, Summer 2016 and Fall 2016. Modern Language Association. 26 Broadway, 3rd Floor, New York, NY 10004-1789.
Oakhill, J., Cain, K., & Elbro, C. (2014). Understanding and teaching reading comprehension: A handbook. Routledge.
Ryding, K. C. (2006). Teaching Arabic in the United States. Handbook for Arabic Language Teaching Professionals in the 21st Century, 13–20.
Ryding, K. C., & Allen, R. (2013). Teaching and learning Arabic as a foreign language: A guide for teachers. Georgetown University Press.
Yousaf, M., Umar, H., & Habib, A. (2017). Communicative Language Teaching (CLT), role of grammar and teachers' beliefs. Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 5(1), 116.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.